IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbdms/spiii2020604.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Nutzungsmuster von Carsharing im Kontext von Strategien nachhaltiger Mobilität: Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel von "WeShare"-Carsharing auf Basis von Nutzer*innenbefragungen und Buchungsdaten

Author

Listed:
  • Ruhrort, Lisa
  • Knie, Andreas
  • Zehl, Franziska
  • Weber, Patrick

Abstract

Flexibles Carsharing bietet in den Städten eine Alternative zum privaten PKW-Besitz. Der mögliche Beitrag dieser Dienstleistungen zu einer Reduktion der Autoanzahl wird aber immer wieder kontrovers diskutiert. Die empirische Datenbasis zu dieser Frage ist bisher noch relativ klein. Die vorliegende Studie untersucht die Mobilitätsmuster und Einstellungen von Carsharing-Nutzer*innen im Kontext von Strategien zur Reduktion des Autoverkehrs in Städten. Für die Studie des Wissenschaftszentrums Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB) wurden rund 1.600 Nutzer*innen von WeShare online, über einen standardisierten Fragebogen befragt. Außerdem wurden Buchungsdaten von rund 600.000 Buchungen im Zeitraum von September 2019 bis Februar 2020 ausgewertet. Die Ergebnisse sprechen dafür, dass Carsharing eine bedeutende Rolle dabei spielen kann, das Leben ohne eigenes Auto in den Städten attraktiver zu machen. Von den Befragten, die das Angebot von WeShare nutzen und einen eigenen PKW besitzen, kann sich rund die Hälfte vorstellen, zukünftig ihr Auto abzuschaffen. Von den Befragten, die bislang kein Auto im Haushalt haben, würden rund 24 Prozent ein Auto anschaffen, wenn es kein Carsharing gäbe. Darüber hinaus spricht sich die Mehrheit der Befragten für eine Verkehrspolitik aus, die mehr Platz für den Radverkehr schafft und dafür den Parkraum für private Fahrzeug stark einschränkt. Carsharing zeigt sich hier als Element einer alternativen Mobilität, in dem das Auto zwar genutzt wird, ihm aber nicht mehr zugestanden wird, den öffentlichen Raum zu dominieren. Die Daten geben Hinweise darauf, dass flexibles Carsharing dabei helfen kann, den privaten Autobesitz zu reduzieren. Sie sprechen auch dafür, dass eine Verkehrspolitik, die den privaten Autoverkehr deutlich eingrenzt, möglich wäre und akzeptiert werden würde. Als Handlungsempfehlung an die Kommunen ergibt sich daraus, dass das flexible Carsharing gefördert werden sollte und zugleich Maßnahmen zur Verringerung des privaten Autoverkehrs umgesetzt werden sollten.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruhrort, Lisa & Knie, Andreas & Zehl, Franziska & Weber, Patrick, 2020. "Nutzungsmuster von Carsharing im Kontext von Strategien nachhaltiger Mobilität: Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel von "WeShare"-Carsharing auf Basis von Nutzer*innenbefragungen und Buchungsdaten," Discussion Papers, Research Group Digital Mobility and Social Differentiation SP III 2020-604, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbdms:spiii2020604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/227583/1/174234285X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Notz, Jos Nino, 2017. "Die Privatisierung öffentlichen Raums durch parkende Kfz: Von der Tragödie einer Allmende - über Ursache, Wirkung und Legitimation einer gemeinwohlschädigenden Regulierungspraxis," IVP-Discussion Papers 2017 (1), Technische Universität Berlin, Fachgebiet Integrierte Verkehrsplanung.
    2. Johanna Kopp & Regine Gerike & Kay Axhausen, 2015. "Do sharing people behave differently? An empirical evaluation of the distinctive mobility patterns of free-floating car-sharing members," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 449-469, May.
    3. Jochem, Patrick & Frankenhauser, Dominik & Ewald, Lukas & Ensslen, Axel & Fromm, Hansjörg, 2020. "Does free-floating carsharing reduce private vehicle ownership? The case of SHARE NOW in European cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 373-395.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruhrort, Lisa, 2020. "Reassessing the Role of Shared Mobility Services in a Transport Transition: Can They Contribute the Rise of an Alternative Socio-Technical Regime of Mobility?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(19), pages 1-1.
    2. Chicco, Andrea & Diana, Marco & Loose, Willi & Nehrke, Gunnar, 2022. "Comparing car ownership reduction patterns among members of different car sharing schemes operating in three German inner-city areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 370-385.
    3. Lisa Ruhrort, 2020. "Reassessing the Role of Shared Mobility Services in a Transport Transition: Can They Contribute the Rise of an Alternative Socio-Technical Regime of Mobility?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Aguilera-García, Álvaro & Gomez, Juan & Antoniou, Constantinos & Vassallo, José Manuel, 2022. "Behavioral factors impacting adoption and frequency of use of carsharing: A tale of two European cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 55-72.
    5. Meng, Zhiyi & Li, Eldon Y. & Qiu, Rui, 2020. "Environmental sustainability with free-floating carsharing services: An on-demand refueling recommendation system for Car2go in Seattle," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Natalia Fabra & Catarina Pintassilgo & Mateus Souza, 2024. "Observed patterns of free-floating car-sharing use," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 259-297, September.
    7. Mengwei Chen & Yilin Sun & E Owen D Waygood & Jincheng Yu & Kai Zhu, 2022. "User characteristics and service satisfaction of car sharing systems: Evidence from Hangzhou, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Doll, Claus & Krauss, Konstantin, 2022. "Nachhaltige Mobilität und innovative Geschäftsmodelle," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 10-2022, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    9. Qian Duan & Xin Ye & Jian Li & Ke Wang, 2020. "Empirical Modeling Analysis of Potential Commute Demand for Carsharing in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Goletz, Mirko & Haustein, Sonja & Wolking, Christina & L’Hostis, Alain, 2020. "Intermodality in European metropolises: The current state of the art, and the results of an expert survey covering Berlin, Copenhagen, Hamburg and Paris," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 109-122.
    11. Diana, Marco & Chicco, Andrea, 2022. "The spatial reconfiguration of parking demand due to car sharing diffusion: a simulated scenario for the cities of Milan and Turin (Italy)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    12. Weibo Li & Maria Kamargianni, 2020. "Steering short-term demand for car-sharing: a mode choice and policy impact analysis by trip distance," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2233-2265, October.
    13. María J. Alonso-González & Oded Cats & Niels van Oort & Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2021. "What are the determinants of the willingness to share rides in pooled on-demand services?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1733-1765, August.
    14. Mario Binetti & Leonardo Caggiani & Rosalia Camporeale & Michele Ottomanelli, 2019. "A Sustainable Crowdsourced Delivery System to Foster Free-Floating Bike-Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    15. María J. Alonso-González & Oded Cats & Niels van Oort & Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser & Serge Hoogendoorn, 0. "What are the determinants of the willingness to share rides in pooled on-demand services?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-33.
    16. Katarzyna Turoń, 2022. "The Expectations towards Cars to Be Used in Car-Sharing Services—The Perspective of the Current Polish Non-Users," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Riccardo Ceccato & Marco Diana, 2021. "Substitution and complementarity patterns between traditional transport means and car sharing: a person and trip level analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1523-1540, August.
    18. Florian Aschauer & Inka Rösel & Reinhard Hössinger & Heinz Brian Kreis & Regine Gerike, 2019. "Time use, mobility and expenditure: an innovative survey design for understanding individuals’ trade-off processes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 307-339, April.
    19. Narayanan, Santhanakrishnan & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2023. "Shared mobility services towards Mobility as a Service (MaaS): What, who and when?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Rotaris, Lucia & Danielis, Romeo & Maltese, Ila, 2019. "Carsharing use by college students: The case of Milan and Rome," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 239-251.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbdms:spiii2020604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.