IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/voodps/32017.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effizienzkonsum: Produktivitätssteigerung als Beschreibungsrahmen bestimmter Konsum-Entscheidungen

Author

Listed:
  • Siemoneit, Andreas

Abstract

Als Beitrag zur Debatte um mögliche Wachstumszwänge diskutiert dieser Artikel folgende These: Unternehmen und Konsumenten kaufen beide zahlreiche Güter, die sie effizienter machen. Dies erzeugt positive Rückkopplungen, die man als Wachstumszwang interpretieren kann. Für Unternehmen wird Effizienzsteigerung seit langem als Investitionsmotiv akzeptiert, aber weder Mikroökonomik noch Konsumsoziologie diskutieren sie auch nur als Konsummotiv. Nach einigen Begriffsbestimmungen wird 'Effizienzkonsum' als Maßnahme der Einkommenssicherung theoretisch begründet. Freiwillig ist Effizienzkonsum nur für Vorreiter: Innovative Konsumgüter werden über soziale Diffusionsprozesse von einer willkommenen Erweiterung des Möglichkeitenraumes zu einem sozialen Imperativ, dessen Nichtbefolgung zunehmend auch ökonomische Nachteile hat. Verschiedene Rückkopplungsmechanismen sorgen dafür, dass Effizienzkonsum nicht nur das Privatleben beschleunigt, sondern langfristig auch immer effizientere Industrie- und Handelsstrukturen begünstigt. Möglicherweise ist mittlerweile sogar Statuskonsum von Effizienzüberlegungen beeinflusst. Mikroökonomik und Konsumsoziologie haben diese Phänomene bislang kaum wahrgenommen. Denkbare Ursachen sind eine 'Disziplinenlücke' aufgrund akademischer Arbeitsteilung, unterschiedlicher Sprachgebrauch für Unternehmen und Konsumenten sowie Effekte des Arbeits- und Sozialrechts. Ein alternatives Theoriemodell des Konsums könnte die Asymmetrie zwischen Unternehmen und Konsumenten abmildern. In Anlehnung an die 'Charakteristika' der Konsumtheorie von Kelvin Lancaster werden Funktionen des Konsums definiert, welche sich bei Unternehmen und Konsumenten gleichermaßen finden lassen.

Suggested Citation

  • Siemoneit, Andreas, 2017. "Effizienzkonsum: Produktivitätssteigerung als Beschreibungsrahmen bestimmter Konsum-Entscheidungen," VÖÖ Discussion Papers 3/2017, Vereinigung für Ökologische Ökonomie e.V. (VÖÖ).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:voodps:32017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/150538/1/880023767.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kelvin J. Lancaster, 1966. "A New Approach to Consumer Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(2), pages 132-132.
    2. Stigler, George J & Becker, Gary S, 1977. "De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 67(2), pages 76-90, March.
    3. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2017. "Wachstumszwänge: Ressourcenverbrauch und Akkumulation als Wettbewerbsverzerrungen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 169-182.
    4. Frank, Robert H, 1985. "The Demand for Unobservable and Other Nonpositional Goods," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(1), pages 101-116, March.
    5. Frank Ackerman, 1997. "Consumed in Theory: Alternative Perspectives on the Economics of Consumption," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 651-664, September.
    6. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2017. "How imperative are the Joneses? Economic growth between individual desire and social coercion," VÖÖ Discussion Papers 4/2017, Vereinigung für Ökologische Ökonomie e.V. (VÖÖ).
    7. Binswanger, Mathias, 2001. "Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 119-132, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2017. "How imperative are the Joneses? Economic growth between individual desire and social coercion," VÖÖ Discussion Papers 4/2017, Vereinigung für Ökologische Ökonomie e.V. (VÖÖ).
    2. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2019. "Wachstumszwang – eine Übersicht," ZOE Discussion Papers 3, ZOE. institute for future-fit economies, Bonn.
    3. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2017. "Fear of stagnation? A review on growth imperatives," VÖÖ Discussion Papers 6/2017, Vereinigung für Ökologische Ökonomie e.V. (VÖÖ).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siemoneit, Andreas, 2019. "An offer you can't refuse: Enhancing personal productivity through ‘efficiency consumption’," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    2. Jacobs Martin, 2016. "Accounting for Changing Tastes: Approaches to Explaining Unstable Individual Preferences," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 67(2), pages 121-183, August.
    3. Kemp-Benedict, Eric, 2013. "Material needs and aggregate demand," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 16-26.
    4. McClure, James & Kumcu, Erdogan, 2008. "Promotions and product pricing: Parsimony versus Veblenesque demand," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 105-117, January.
    5. Jakob Kapeller & Bernhard Schütz & Stefan Steinerberger, 2013. "The impossibility of rational consumer choice," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 39-60, January.
    6. Siemoneit, Andreas, 2019. "An offer you can't refuse – Enhancing personal productivity through 'efficiency consumption'," ZOE Discussion Papers 2, ZOE. institute for future-fit economies, Bonn.
    7. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/vbu6kd1s68o6r34k5bcm3iopv is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Brian L. Goff & Robert D. Tollison, 1999. "The Market Provision of Addiction Control Services," Public Finance Review, , vol. 27(2), pages 115-137, March.
    9. Victor Ginsburgh, 2013. "Mark Blaug and the economics of the arts," Chapters, in: Marcel Boumans & Matthias Klaes (ed.), Mark Blaug: Rebel with Many Causes, chapter 15, pages 208-224, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Roger D. Congleton, 2020. "Governance by true believers: supreme duties with and without totalitarianism," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 111-141, March.
    11. Corneo, Giacomo & Jeanne, Olivier, 1999. "Segmented communication and fashionable behavior," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 371-385, July.
    12. Ondřej Vojáček, 2011. "K pojetí preferencí v ekonomickém myšlení [Preference Dilemma in Economics]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2011(3), pages 345-358.
    13. Anne Bretteville-Jensen, 2006. "Drug Demand – Initiation, Continuation and Quitting," De Economist, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 491-516, December.
    14. Daniel Urrutiaguer, 2002. "Quality Judgements and Demand for French Public Theatre," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 26(3), pages 185-202, August.
    15. Veisten, Knut, 2007. "Contingent valuation controversies: Philosophic debates about economic theory," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 204-232, April.
    16. Jonathan D. Ketcham & Nicolai V. Kuminoff & Christopher A. Powers, 2016. "Estimating the Heterogeneous Welfare Effects of Choice Architecture: An Application to the Medicare Prescription Drug Insurance Market," NBER Working Papers 22732, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Cherchye, Laurens & De Rock, Bram & Vermeulen, Frederic, 2015. "A simple identification strategy for Gary Becker’s time allocation model," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 187-190.
    18. Richters, Oliver & Siemoneit, Andreas, 2019. "Wachstumszwang – eine Übersicht," ZOE Discussion Papers 3, ZOE. institute for future-fit economies, Bonn.
    19. Chai, Andreas & Stepanova, Elena & Moneta, Alessio, 2023. "Quantifying expenditure hierarchies and the expansion of global consumption diversity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 860-886.
    20. Andreas Chai, 2017. "Tackling Keynes’ question: a look back on 15 years of Learning To Consume," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 251-271, April.
    21. Justin P. Johnson & David P. Myatt, 2006. "On the Simple Economics of Advertising, Marketing, and Product Design," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(3), pages 756-784, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:voodps:32017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.voeoe.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.