IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/tucdir/12006.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How many networks are we to manage?

Author

Listed:
  • Roth, Steffen

Abstract

The continuous transformation of the industrial society into a service and knowledge society is accompanied by profound change of demand: Customer requests will increasingly focus on individual products, shorter delivery times and appropriate prices. To encounter these challenges under the conditions of dynamic global markets and inter-regional competition, the CRC 457 Non-Hierarchical Regional Production-Networks at the Chemnitz University of Technology focuses on SME and investigates ways to implement customer-oriented, temporary networking of smallest, autonomous units (competence cells) in the region of South-West-Saxony. As a partial result of this research we are able to present a model of competence cell based networking distinguishing between three levels of networking, each with its own logic of reproduction (cp. Figure 1): 1) According to a most general concept, networks can be seen as given in any social context. Regarding a specific region, one has to assume that there is a broad array of infra-structural, mental and communicative relations; that as a whole we call the Regional Network. This level can be seen as basic level of competence cell based networking, specific elements (competence cells) of this network can be seen as necessary resources of the following level. 2) The second level of networking we call Competence Network. The first continuous problem of this network is to select competence cells according to relevant parameters that may be defined by customer orders or, in view of new market entry, be generated by the Competence Network itself. The second problem is to arrange these cells along a product specific value chain and, by this means, to create temporary production networks. Concerning both of the problems, the third is to find a non-hierarchical mode of negotiation. 3) On the third level temporary alliances of basically autonomous competence cells can be observed. After executing their order, these Production Networks dissolve and the constituent cells reenter the second or even the first level of networking. Generalising our observation we now assume that every phenomena labelled as regional or industrial network or district should be investigated in view of (these) different levels of networking, especially if we are interested in dealing more efficiently with the problems of network management. Hence, we suggest to first answer the question Which (of these) networks are we to manage? before asking how. Concerning the latter, a synopsis on the discourse on managing networks shows three major approaches: 1) Networks are assumed to be uncontrollable (cp. e.g. Castells 2001), as they are self-organised systems selecting external control impulses only by their own criterias of relevance, so we have either to adapt the logic of the target system (which implies self-adaption) or to take the risk of being totally ignored. With this in mind we can't speak of control in terms of causal logic. 2) Networks are assumed to be cultivable: According to Wenger and Snyder (2000) for example networks are uncontrollable, but - like a gardener - we are able to set adequate general conditions for their growth and continuity. 3) Networks are assumed to be controllable: For authors like Sydow (2000) networks are to be seen as hybrid forms of coordination recombining aspects of market and hierarchy. Thus, recombining the classical means of control will finally lead to the ability to manage networks. It will be to show that each of these approaches focuses on specific aspects of networking, thus, each of them is creating a self-contained concept of networks: Castells refers to networks as a basal nexus of (global) interconnectedness that, like the Regional Network in our case, obviously can't be managed. Wenger and Snyder are interested in network-organisations that (like Competence Networks) also can't be controlled but can be implemented by and embedded in other social systems (cp. Grabher 1993). Sydow finally observes networks of more or less autonomous organisations corresponding to our Production Networks, which are in deed more or less controllable. Not least because of their different theoretical assumptions, all these concepts seemed to be not only incommensurable but incompatible so far. Nonetheless, during our work in CRC 457 we were to manage all these concepts while approaching to one single objective of research. Therefore, we had to ask, how many perspectives on network are we to manage? The answer is: at least three. Integrating these, we generated a holistic life-cycle model of network, which we like to present as starting point for further research in the field network management.

Suggested Citation

  • Roth, Steffen, 2006. "How many networks are we to manage?," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 1/2006, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:tucdir:12006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/55397/1/684990504.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jürgen Peters & Wolfgang Becker, 1997. "Vertical Corporate Networks in the German Automotive Industry," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 158-185, December.
    2. Arnold Picot, 1998. "Die grenzenlose Unternehmung," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 51(34), pages 44-55, October.
    3. Arnold Picot, 1998. "Die grenzenlose Unternehmung," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 51(34-35), pages 44-55, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Markus Solf, 2004. "Unternehmenskooperationen als Folge von Informations- und Kommunikations-technologieveränderungen: Eine theoretische Analyse," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 146-167, March.
    2. Wagner, Stefan, 2006. "Make-or-Buy Decisions in Patent Related Services," Discussion Papers in Business Administration 1264, University of Munich, Munich School of Management.
    3. Eymann, Torsten (Ed.), 2009. "Tagungsband zum Doctoral Consortium der WI 2009 [WI2009 Doctoral Consortium Proceedings]," Bayreuth Reports on Information Systems Management 40, University of Bayreuth, Chair of Information Systems Management.
    4. Albers, Sönke & Bisping, Dirk & Teichmann, Kai & Wolf, Joachim, 2002. "Management virtueller Unternehmen," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 558, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    5. Fritz Sager & Adrian Ritz & Kristina Bussmann, 2010. "Utilization-focused performance reporting," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 55-62, January.
    6. Bonus, Holger & Greve, Rolf & Kring, Thorn & Polster, Dirk, 1999. "Der genossenschaftliche Finanzverbund als Strategisches Netzwerk: Neue Wege zur Kleinheit," Arbeitspapiere 16, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    7. Becker, Jörg & Beverungen, Daniel & Knackstedt, Ralf & Matzner, Martin & Müller, Oliver & Pöppelbuß, Jens, 2011. "Flexible Informationssystem-Architekturen für hybride Wertschöpfungsnetzwerke (Flexnet): Forschungsprojekt im Rahmen der BMBF-Fördermaßnahme Integration von Produktion und Dienstleistung," Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Wirtschaftsinformatik 130, University of Münster, Department of Information Systems.
    8. Söllner, Matthias, 2008. "Menschliches Verhalten in elektronischen Märkten," Bayreuth Reports on Information Systems Management 34, University of Bayreuth, Chair of Information Systems Management.
    9. Müller, Hans-Erich & Martin, Annette, 2000. "Beschäftigen statt entlassen: Instrumente des Beschäftigungs-Managements mit Fallstudien aus der Energieversorgung," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 29, number 29.
    10. Theurl, Theresia & Franz, Stefanie, 2007. ""Benchmark integrierte Versorgung im Gesundheitswesen": Erste empirische Ergebnisse," Arbeitspapiere 64, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    11. Martin Kloyer, 2004. "Opportunismus und Verhandlungsmacht in F&E-Lieferbeziehungen — Eine empirische Untersuchung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 333-364, June.
    12. Höckels, Astrid, 2000. "Möglichkeiten zur Absicherung von Humankapitalinvestitionen zur Vermeidung unerwünschter Mitarbeiterfluktuationen," Arbeitspapiere 20, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.
    13. Führ, Martin & Baukrowitz, Andrea (ed.), 2005. "Evaluierung regionalwirtschaftlicher Wirkungsanalysen," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 147.
    14. Hauschildt, Jürgen & Vollstedt, Marina, 2001. "Unternehmenssprachen oder Company Language? Zur Einführung einer einheitlichen Sprache in global tätigen Unternehmen," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 540, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    15. Klodt, Henning, 2001. "Direktinvestitionen, Fusionen und Strukturwandel," Kiel Working Papers 1083, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    16. Matthias Tomenendal & Christian Raffer & Stephanie Stockklauser & Johannes Kirch, 2018. "Introducing the T-shaped model of cluster competence – an integrative framework and first empirical evidence from the German craftsmen sector," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 144-166, February.
    17. Manthou, Vicky & Vlachopoulou, Maro & Folinas, Dimitris, 2004. "Virtual e-Chain (VeC) model for supply chain collaboration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 241-250, February.
    18. Adelsberger, Heimo (Ed.) & Drechsler, Andreas (Ed.), 2010. "Ausgewählte Aspekte des Cloud-Computing aus einer IT-Management-Perspektive: Cloud Governance, Cloud Security und Einsatz von Cloud Computing in jungen Unternehmen," ICB Research Reports 41, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB).
    19. Berthold, Norbert & Brischke, Marita & Stettes, Oliver, 2003. "Betriebliche Bündnisse für Arbeit - eine empirische Untersuchung für den deutschen Maschinen- und Anlagenbau," Discussion Paper Series 68, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Chair of Economic Order and Social Policy.
    20. Kink, Natalie & Hess, Thomas, 2008. "Wirkungsanalyse von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien: Positionierung des Forschungsansatzes," Working Papers 1/2008, University of Munich, Munich School of Management, Institute for Information Systems and New Media.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:tucdir:12006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwtucde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.