IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/safewp/308046.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Unveiling the consequences of esg rating disagreement: An empirical analysis of the impact on the cost of equity capital

Author

Listed:
  • Mio, Chiara
  • Fasan, Marco
  • Costantini, Antonio
  • Scarpa, Francesco
  • Fitzpatrick, Aoife Claire

Abstract

Recent academic research exhibits considerable disagreement among ESG ratings from different agency providers. The consequences of this disagreement on the market are still under-explored; thus, we investigate whether this disagreement impacts the cost of equity capital. Using a sample of 23,201 firm-month observations from January 2019 to March 2021, we find that ESG disagreement positively moderates the negative relationship between the average ESG score and cost of equity. By disentangling the aggregate ESG score, we find that the moderating effect of this disagreement does not hold for any pillar. Furthermore, the association between ESG rating disagreement and cost of equity is more pronounced in the presence of high analyst information uncertainty. Overall, our findings highlight that ESG rating disagreement jeopardizes investors' confidence in ESG ratings and weakens the role of these ratings in reducing the cost of equity, pointing to the need to improve convergence across agency providers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mio, Chiara & Fasan, Marco & Costantini, Antonio & Scarpa, Francesco & Fitzpatrick, Aoife Claire, 2024. "Unveiling the consequences of esg rating disagreement: An empirical analysis of the impact on the cost of equity capital," SAFE Working Paper Series 440, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:safewp:308046
    DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5054102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/308046/1/1912804581.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2139/ssrn.5054102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:safewp:308046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csafede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.