IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgd/p0057.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die Umsetzung von EU-Richtlinien im Zeichen der Parteipolitik: Eine akteurzentrierte Antwort auf die Misfit-These

Author

Listed:
  • Treib, Oliver

Abstract

Vor dem Hintergrund der Debatte über die Steuerungsfähigkeit der EU befasst sich dieser Beitrag mit der Frage, welche Faktoren zu einer korrekten und pünktlichen Umsetzung von EU-Richtlinien beitragen. Er setzt sich mit der häufig vertretenen Misfit-These auseinander, gemäß der die Qualität und die Schnelligkeit der nationalen Anpassung vor allem durch das Ausmaß der Kompatibilität zwischen europäischen Vorgaben und bestehenden nationalen Strukturen bestimmt wird. Anhand empirischer Ergebnisse über die Umsetzung von sechs arbeitsrechtlichen Richtlinien in vier Ländern wird die begrenzte Erklärungskraft dieser These demonstriert. Der Beitrag weist stattdessen auf die zentrale Rolle der nationalen Parteipolitik hin und diskutiert die Implikationen dieses Befundes für die Problemlösungskapazität der EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Treib, Oliver, 2003. "Die Umsetzung von EU-Richtlinien im Zeichen der Parteipolitik: Eine akteurzentrierte Antwort auf die Misfit-These," MPIfG Discussion Paper 03/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:p0057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/43169/1/361894694.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/8391 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Borrass, Lars, 2014. "Varying practices of implementing the Habitats Directive in German and British forests," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 151-160.
    3. Gerda Falkner & Miriam Hartlapp & Oliver Treib, 2006. "Worlds of compliance: Why leading approaches to the implementation of EU legislation are only 'sometimes-true theories'," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 22, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    4. Sophie Jacquot & Cornelia Woll, 2003. "Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01019642, HAL.
    5. Juna Toska & Renate Reiter & Annette Elisabeth Töller, 2022. "When European Policies Meet German Federalism: A Study on the Implementation of the EU Reception Conditions Directive," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 26-35.
    6. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/8391 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:erp:cevipo:p0039 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Michael Kaeding, 2008. "Lost in Translation or Full Steam Ahead," European Union Politics, , vol. 9(1), pages 115-143, March.
    9. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8391 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Leiber, Simone, 2005. "Europäische Sozialpolitik und nationale Sozialpartnerschaft. Politik − Verbände − Recht: Die Umsetzung europäischer Sozialpolitik, Band 2," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 52, number 52.
    11. Karen M. Anderson & Michael Kaeding, 2015. "European Integration and Pension Policy Change: Variable Patterns of Europeanization in Italy, the Netherlands and Belgium," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 53(2), pages 231-253, June.
    12. Sophie Jacquot & Cornelia Woll, 2003. "Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective," Post-Print hal-01019642, HAL.
    13. Brooke Luetgert & Tanja Dannwolf, 2009. "Mixing Methods," European Union Politics, , vol. 10(3), pages 307-334, September.
    14. repec:ulb:ulbcvp:p0039 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Rafael Ziegler & Sabrina Schulz & Lukas Richter & Martin Schreck, 2014. "Following Gandhi: Social Entrepreneurship as A Non-Violent Way of Communicating Sustainability Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-19, February.
    16. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/8391 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:p0057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.