IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgd/943.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die politische Logik der deutschen Vereinigung und der Institutionentransfer: Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel von Gesundheitswesen, Forschungssystem und Telekommunikation

Author

Listed:
  • Robischon, Tobias
  • Stucke, Andreas
  • Wasem, Jürgen
  • Wolf, Hans-Georg

Abstract

Der vorliegende Beitrag untersucht die 1990 im Kontext des Vereinigungsprozesses getroffenen Entscheidungen über die künftige institutionelle Struktur Ostdeutschlands. Ausgangspunkt sind zwei politikwissenschaftliche Befunde, die zunächst nicht leicht vereinbar scheinen: Einerseits lief die Vereinigungspolitik nach einer gängigen Sichtweise unter Ausnahmebedingungen mit außergewöhnlicher Entscheidungssouveränität des westdeutschen Zentralstaats ab, andererseits aber spiegelten die getroffenen Entscheidungen nicht etwa materielle Veränderungsinteressen des Bundes wider, sondern bedeuteten in der Regel den unmodifizierten Transfer westdeutscher Institutionen. Dieses scheinbare Paradox löst sich jedoch im Blick auf die vorgängige Situation in den einzelnen funktionalen Sektoren der alten Bundesrepublik auf. Das Ergebnis der Vereinigungspolitik läßt sich auf drei sektorale Merkmale zurückführen: institutioneller Konsens oder Dissens; Politikverflechtung oder Dominanz eines einzelnen Akteurs; und (gegebenenfalls) Veränderungswünsche des dominanten Akteurs. Am Beispiel dreier Sektoren - Gesundheitswesen, Forschungssystem und Telekommunikation - wird gezeigt, wie unterschiedliche Kombinationen dieser drei Merkmale das Resultat des Vereinigungsprozesses hervorbrachten: den Institutionentransfer nach Ostdeutschland.

Suggested Citation

  • Robischon, Tobias & Stucke, Andreas & Wasem, Jürgen & Wolf, Hans-Georg, 1994. "Die politische Logik der deutschen Vereinigung und der Institutionentransfer: Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel von Gesundheitswesen, Forschungssystem und Telekommunikation," MPIfG Discussion Paper 94/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/43724/1/04352379X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manow, Philip, 1994. "Gesundheitspolitik im Einigungsprozeß," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 16, number 16.
    2. Dunsire, Andrew, 1993. "Manipulating social tensions: Collibration as an alternative mode of government intervention," MPIfG Discussion Paper 93/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Schmidt, Susanne K., 1991. "Taking the long road to liberalization : Telecommunications reform in the Federal Republic of Germany," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 209-222, June.
    4. Rosewitz, Bernd & Webber, Douglas, 1990. "Reformversuche und Reformblockaden im deutschen Gesundheitswesen," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 5, number 5.
    5. Busch, Axel, 1990. "Deutsche Postunion: Ein ordnungspolitisch fragwürdiger Schritt," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 70(7), pages 363-367.
    6. Stucke, Andreas, 1993. "Institutionalisierung der Forschungspolitik: Entstehung, Entwicklung und Steuerungsprobleme des Bundesforschungsministeriums," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 12, number 12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bolhuis, Peter G. & Frenkel, Daan, 1997. "Microscopic and mesoscopic simulation of entropic micelles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 45-58.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schimank, Uwe & Stucke, Andreas (ed.), 1994. "Coping with Trouble: How Science Reacts to Political Disturbances of Research Conditions," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 14, number 14.
    2. Manow, Philip, 1994. "Strukturinduzierte Politikgleichgewichte: Das Gesundheitsstrukturgesetz (GSG) und seine Vorgänger," MPIfG Discussion Paper 94/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Wasem, Jurgen, 1997. "A study on decentralizing from acute care to home care settings in Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(Supplemen), pages 109-129, September.
    4. Holzscheiter, Anna & Bahr, Thurid & Pantzerhielm, Laura, 2016. "Emerging Governance Architectures in Global Health: Do Metagovernance Norms Explain Inter-Organisational Convergence?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 4(3), pages 5-19.
    5. Mark Lehrer, 2007. "Organizing knowledge spillovers when basic and applied research are interdependent: German biotechnology policy in historical perspective," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 277-296, June.
    6. Lehrer, Mark & Asakawa, Kazuhiro, 2004. "Rethinking the public sector: idiosyncrasies of biotechnology commercialization as motors of national R&D reform in Germany and Japan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6-7), pages 921-938, September.
    7. Rosenbrock, Rolf & Schaeffer, Doris & Dubois-Arber, Francoise & Moers, Martin & Pinell, Patrice & Setbon, Michel, 1999. "The Aids policy cycle in Western Europe: From exceptionalism to normalization," Discussion Papers, Research Group Public Health P 99-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Grande, Edgar, 2001. "The erosion of state capacity and the European innovation policy dilemma: A comparison of German and EU information technology policies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 905-921, June.
    9. Urban, Hans-Jürgen, 2001. "Wettbewerbskorporatistische Regulierung im Politikfeld Gesundheit: Der Bundesausschuss der Ärzte und Krankenkassen und die gesundheitspolitische Wende," Discussion Papers, Research Group Public Health P 01-206, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Behaghel, Katrin, 1994. "Kostendämpfung und ärztliche Interessenvertretung: Ein Verbandsystem unter Stress," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 18, number 18.
    11. Wendt, Claus & Rothgang, Heinz & Helmert, Uwe, 2005. "The self-regulatory German health care system between growing competition and state hierarchy," TranState Working Papers 32, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    12. Marin, Bernd & Mayntz, Renate (ed.), 1991. "Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 9, number 9.
    13. Noweski, Michael & Engelmann, Fabian, 2006. "Was ist Gesundheitspolitologie? Entwicklungsstand und Entwicklungspotenziale des politikwissenschaftlichen Beitrages zur Gesundheitssystemforschung," Discussion Papers, Research Group Public Health SP I 2006-307, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    14. Besley, Timothy & Burgess, Robin & Pratt, Andrea, 2002. "Mass media and political accountability," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 35988, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Anna Holzscheiter & Thurid Bahr & Laura Pantzerhielm, 2016. "Emerging Governance Architectures in Global Health: Do Metagovernance Norms Explain Inter-Organisational Convergence?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 5-19.
    16. Wangsik Kim, 2008. "The Context of EU Telecommunications Reform Process: The Cases of Britain and Germany," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 117-136, May.
    17. Thatcher, Mark, 2001. "The EU commission and national governments as partners: EC regulatory expansion in telecommunications 1979-2000," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 35979, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Giesecke, Susanne, 2000. "The contrasting roles of government in the development of biotechnology industry in the US and Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 205-223, February.
    19. Rosenbrock, Rolf & Schaeffer, Doris & Dubois-Arber, Francoise & Moers, Martin & Pinell, Patrice & Setbon, Michel, 1999. "Die Normalisierung von Aids in Westeuropa: Der Politik-Zyklus am Beispiel einer Infektionskrankheit," Discussion Papers, Research Group Public Health P 99-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    20. Stiller, Sabina, 2007. "Surveying the welfare state: challenges, policy development and causes of resilience," Working papers of the ZeS 01/2007, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.