IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgd/2014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Resilience or relocation? Expectations and reality in the city of London since the Brexit referendum

Author

Listed:
  • Kalaitzake, Manolis

Abstract

The fate of British finance following the Brexit referendum revolves around the "resilience or relocation" debate: will the City of London continue to thrive as the world's leading financial centre or will the bulk of its activity move to rival hubs after departure from EU trading arrangements? Despite extensive commentary, there remains no systematic analysis of this question since the Leave vote. This paper addresses that lacuna by evaluating the empirical evidence concerning jobs, investments, and share of key trading markets (between June 2016 and May 2020). Contrary to widely held expectations, the evidence suggests that the City has been remarkably resilient. Brexit has had no significant impact on jobs and London has consolidated its position as the chief location for financial FDI, FinTech funding, and attracting new firms. Most unexpectedly, the City has increased its dominance in major infrastructure markets such as (euro-denominated) clearing, derivatives, and foreign exchange - although it has lost out in the handling of European repurchase agreements. Based upon this evidence, the paper argues that the UK's negotiating position is stronger than typically recognised, and outlines the competitive ramifications for both the UK and EU financial sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalaitzake, Manolis, 2020. "Resilience or relocation? Expectations and reality in the city of London since the Brexit referendum," MPIfG Discussion Paper 20/14, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:2014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/228700/1/1743150245.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben Rosamond, 2019. "Brexit and the Politics of UK Growth Models," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 408-421, May.
    2. Gary A S Cook & Naresh R Pandit & Jonathan V Beaverstock & Peter J Taylor & Kathy Pain, 2007. "The Role of Location in Knowledge Creation and Diffusion: Evidence of Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces in the City of London Financial Services Agglomeration," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(6), pages 1325-1345, June.
    3. Staiger, Uta, 2018. "Brexit and Beyond," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9781787352773 edited by Martill, Benjamin, January.
    4. Charles Goodhart & Dirk Schoenmaker, 2016. "The United States dominates global investment banking- does it matter for Europe?," Policy Contributions 13132, Bruegel.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuai Shi & Kathy Pain, 2020. "Investigating China’s Mid-Yangtze River economic growth region using a spatial network growth model," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(14), pages 2973-2993, November.
    2. Dongmei Li & Renai Jiang & Zheyuan Lu & Shanghong Sun & Longguo Wang, 2023. "Does the Construction of High-Speed Rail Change the Development of Regional Finance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, July.
    3. Moshfique Uddin & Anup Chowdhury & Geoffrey Wood, 2022. "The resilience of the British and European goods industry: Challenge of Brexit," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(4), pages 934-954.
    4. Polyzos, Stathis & Samitas, Aristeidis & Katsaiti, Marina-Selini, 2020. "Who is unhappy for Brexit? A machine-learning, agent-based study on financial instability," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Ionelia Bianca BOSOANCĂ, 2022. "The EU eastern enlargement from today’s perspective," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 13(4), pages 367-380, January.
    6. Kiran Klaus Patel, 2020. "Why the EU Became 'Europe'. Towards a New History of European Union," Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 54(1), pages 199-216, June.
    7. Shijun Chai & Yang Chen & Bihong Huang & Dezhu Ye, 2019. "Social networks and informal financial inclusion in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 529-563, June.
    8. Dan Costin NIȚESCU & Cristian ANGHEL, 2022. "International banking, crises and strategic interests," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(631), S), pages 5-24, Summer.
    9. Benjamin Martill, 2021. "Deal or no Deal: Theresa May's Withdrawal Agreement and the Politics of (Non‐)Ratification," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1607-1622, November.
    10. Martín Fuentes, Natalia & Di Vito, Luca & Leite, João Matos, 2023. "Understanding the profitability gap between euro area and US global systemically important banks," Occasional Paper Series 327, European Central Bank.
    11. Roberto Ercegovac & Mario Pečarić & Ivica Klinac, 2020. "Bank Risk Profiles and Business Model Characteristics," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 9(3), pages 107-121.
    12. Margaret Cowell, 2010. "Polycentric Regions: Comparing Complementarity and Institutional Governance in the San Francisco Bay Area, the Randstad and Emilia-Romagna," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(5), pages 945-965, May.
    13. Naresh R. Pandit & Gary A. S. Cook & Feng Wan & Jonathan V. Beaverstock & Pervez N. Ghauri, 2018. "The Economies and Diseconomies of Industrial Clustering: Multinational Enterprises versus Uninational Enterprises," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 935-967, December.
    14. Cassola, Nuno & Kok, Christoffer & Mongelli, Francesco Paolo, 2019. "The ECB after the crisis: existing synergies among monetary policy, macroprudential policies and banking supervision," Occasional Paper Series 237, European Central Bank.
    15. Anessa L. Kimball, 2019. "Knocking NATO: Strategic and institutional challenges risk the future of Europe’s seven-decade long cold peace," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 12(36), October.
    16. Wenzlhuemer Roland, 2009. "London in the Global Telecommunication Network of the Nineteenth Century," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-34, April.
    17. Ben Rosamond, 2020. "European Integration and the Politics of Economic Ideas: Economics, Economists and Market Contestation in the Brexit Debate," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1085-1106, September.
    18. Gabriel Siles-Brügge & Michael Strange, 2020. "National Autonomy or Transnational Solidarity? Using Multiple Geographic Frames to Politicize EU Trade Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 277-289.
    19. Nives Mazur Kumric & Ivan Zeko-Pivac, 2021. "Brexit €“ An Inquiry Into The Socioeconomic Aftereffects From An International And European Perspective," Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 10(Special I), pages 5-17, October.
    20. Palmberg, Johanna, 2012. "Spatial Concentration in the Financial Industry," Ratio Working Papers 188, The Ratio Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:2014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.