IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/khkgcr/11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Conceptualising Local Ownership as 'Reflexive Cooperation': The Deferral of Self-government to Protect 'Unequal' Humans?

Author

Listed:
  • Bargués Pedreny, Pol

Abstract

This article analyses how the concept of ‘local ownership’ has been employed within policy frameworks in the context of peacebuilding since the late 1990s. It identifies the paradox that lies in the increasing willingness to transfer ownership to the local population and the also explicit assumption that self-determination and self-government have to be avoided in democratisation and post-conflict situations. It is argued that it is important to investigate the paradox, the fact that ownership and self-government have opposed connotations within contemporary frameworks of peacebuilding, because in the literature this position is not seen as being contradictory. Far from being seen as a strategy containing an irreconcilable paradox, local ownership is conceptualised so that it resolves at the same time two problems at the core of international governance settings: it limits the international administrators’ intrusiveness in national affairs and avoids the risk of giving too much responsibility to local authorities. While it is presented as a progressive strategy on all fronts, the conclusion of this article is that the concept of ownership, as it has been interpreted by the discourses of peacebuilding analysed here, has been of little value to post-conflict societies and, furthermore, it has denied their moral and political autonomy. This denial, disguised as a discourse that promises to embrace difference, is particularly flawed because it seems to permanently defer equality between internationally supervised populations and the rest of sovereign nations.

Suggested Citation

  • Bargués Pedreny, Pol, 2015. "Conceptualising Local Ownership as 'Reflexive Cooperation': The Deferral of Self-government to Protect 'Unequal' Humans?," Global Cooperation Research Papers 11, University of Duisburg-Essen, Käte Hamburger Kolleg / Centre for Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:khkgcr:11
    DOI: 10.14282/2198-0411-GCRP-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/214704/1/gcrp-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14282/2198-0411-GCRP-11?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Papadimitriou & Petar Petrov, 2012. "Whose Rule, Whose Law? Contested Statehood, External Leverage and the European Union's Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5), pages 746-763, September.
    2. Roger Mac Ginty & Oliver Richmond, 2013. "The Local Turn in Peace Building: a critical agenda for peace," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 763-783.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samantha Melis & Raymond Apthorpe, 2020. "The Politics of the Multi-Local in Disaster Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 366-374.
    2. George Kyris, 2013. "Europeanization beyond Contested Statehood: The European Union and Turkish-Cypriot Civil Society," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 866-883, September.
    3. Caitriona Dowd & Samuel S. Polzin & Kelsey Gleason & Rebecca Yang & Pranay Narang & Ronak Patel, 2024. "Conflict's impacts on food systems: Mapping available evidence of interactions," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 2152-2171, May.
    4. Higgins-Desbiolles, Freya & Bigby, Bobbie Chew, 2022. "A local turn in tourism studies," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Lopera-Arbeláez, Isabel & Richter, Solveig, 2024. "Transformative approaches for peace-centred sustainable development: The role of social and solidarity economy," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    6. Anna K Johnson & Joséphine Lechartre & Şehrazat G Mart & Mark D Robison & Caroline Hughes, 2023. "Peace scholarship and the local turn: Hierarchies in the production of knowledge about peace," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 60(4), pages 675-690, July.
    7. Pamina Firchow & Roger Mac Ginty, 2020. "Including Hard-to-Access Populations Using Mobile Phone Surveys and Participatory Indicators," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(1), pages 133-160, February.
    8. Dong Jin Kim, 2018. "Sharing Lessons between Peace Processes: A Comparative Case Study on the Northern Ireland and Korean Peace Processes," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Khoury, Rana B. & Scott, Emily K.M., 2024. "Going local without localization: Power and humanitarian response in the Syrian war," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. Kluczewska, Karolina & Kreikemeyer, Anna, 2022. "Beyond the local turn: Local orderings and ordering of international organizations," Global Cooperation Research Papers 32, University of Duisburg-Essen, Käte Hamburger Kolleg / Centre for Global Cooperation Research (KHK/GCR21).
    11. Sinclair Dinnen & Matthew Allen, 2016. "State Absence and State Formation in Solomon Islands: Reflections on Agency, Scale and Hybridity," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 47(1), pages 76-97, January.
    12. Bazerkoska Julija Brsakoska & Dokmanović Mišo, 2017. "Learning by Doing: The EU’s Transformative Power and Conflicts in the Western Balkans," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 23(79), pages 103-125, September.
    13. Stefan Bächtold & Joan Bastide & Lara Lundsgaard-Hansen, 2020. "Assembling Drones, Activists and Oil Palms: Implications of a Multi-stakeholder Land Platform for State Formation in Myanmar," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(2), pages 359-378, April.
    14. Jacobo Grajales, 2020. "From war to wealth? Land policies and the peace economy in Côte d’Ivoire [De la guerre à la prospérité ? Politiques foncières et économie de la paix en Côte d’Ivoire]," Post-Print hal-02553089, HAL.
    15. Brast, Benjamin, 2017. "Liberal Statebuilding Interventions and the Monopoly on Violence," SocArXiv yqk9v, Center for Open Science.
    16. Allard Duursma, 2021. "Making disorder more manageable: The short-term effectiveness of local mediation in Darfur," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(3), pages 554-567, May.
    17. Deepen, Yannick & Kurtenbach, Sabine, 2023. "Coping with complexity: Dealing with non-state armed actors," GIGA Working Papers 337, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    18. Almohamad, Selman & Kirchschlager, Markus & Kurtenbach, Sabine, 2020. "Peacebuilding after war and violence - Neighbourhood matters," GIGA Working Papers 324, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    19. Gearoid Millar, 2021. "Ambition and ambivalence: Reconsidering positive peace as a trans-scalar peace system," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(4), pages 640-654, July.
    20. Wakako Maekawa, 2023. "Micro‐Evidence for Peacebuilding Theories and Policies edited by Yuichi Kubota , Singapore, Springer, 2022, viii +120 pp," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 61(3), pages 264-267, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:khkgcr:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.gcr21.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.