IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/kdifoc/44.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Relative Concern: Pros and Cons and Lessons to be Learned

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Hisam

Abstract

Individuals with a strong tendency to compare themselves to others are those who place the priority on work, position, and material goods; have a high degree of financial success; and tend to engage in overconsumption and conspicuous consumption. However, this relative concern was correlated with poorer health and low degrees of happiness and life satisfaction. In order for upward comparison to be a catalyst for self-development, fair competition must be ensured. Relative concern can be used to nudge people into socially desirable behaviors, but in order to increase the degree of happiness, it is necessary to counter the negative effects of social comparison and look after the quality of life to enable people to enjoy a balanced life. - Relative concern is a double-edged sword. It can have the positive effect of stimulating self-development, but it can also have a negative effect on happiness. - Around 36% of Koreans consider it important to compare their standard of living with people around them, while 25% think it is not important. - People who are inclined to relative concern tend to prioritize work and material values and have a goal-oriented mindset. - Individuals with a tendency for relative concern were also likely to exhibit herding and maximizing behavior, while their altruism tended to be limited to their children and their spouse. - For each one-point increase on the relative concern scale, monthly income went up by 29%, real estate value by 22%, and financial assets by 21%. - For each one-point increase on the relative concern scale, expenditures on high-priced durable goods such as automobiles went up by 42 %. - Individuals inclined to relative concern had high levels of anxiety, stress, depression, insomnia, and feelings of isolation, and they had low levels of happiness and satisfaction about their life as a whole. - For each one-point increase on the relative concern scale, happiness fell by a level commensurate with a 20 million won drop in household income. - Relative concern, which Respondents with a tendency for relative concern were more likely to attribute unhappiness to restrictions on upward mobility, the economic recession, decreasing material satisfaction, anxiety about security issues, and in particular an increase in relative deprivation. - Relative concern, which implies concern about other's opinions, can be used to lead people to make conspicuous donations and to reduce use of electricity through peer pressure. - As competition intensifies in a zero-sum game where success is narrowly defined, the positive effects of relative concern are reduced. - If upward comparison is to become a catalyst for development, the person being compared to must not be too far ahead; there must be a way to catch up with that person, and it must be possible to compete with them. - At present, most Koreans prioritize work and financial success. If they are to enjoy greater happiness, they need to achieve a balanced life in which consideration is also given to well-being in the domains of personal relationships, health, and the community. - Research into behavioral economics, which can reveal the characteristics of human psychology and behavior, has the potential to promote policy goals through non-coercive and inexpensive means.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Hisam, 2014. "Relative Concern: Pros and Cons and Lessons to be Learned," KDI Focus 44, Korea Development Institute (KDI).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:kdifoc:44
    DOI: 10.22740/kdi.focus.e.2014.44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/200849/1/kdi-focus-44.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22740/kdi.focus.e.2014.44?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hallsworth, Michael & List, John A. & Metcalfe, Robert D. & Vlaev, Ivo, 2017. "The behavioralist as tax collector: Using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 14-31.
    2. Kim, Hisam & Ohtake, Fumio, 2014. "Status Race and Happiness: What Experimental Surveys Tell Us," KDI Policy Studies 2014-01, Korea Development Institute (KDI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano DellaVigna & Elizabeth Linos, 2022. "RCTs to Scale: Comprehensive Evidence From Two Nudge Units," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(1), pages 81-116, January.
    2. Marcelo Arbex & Justin M. Carre & Shawn N. Geniole & Enlinson Mattos, 2018. "Testosterone, personality traits and tax evasion," Working Papers 1801, University of Windsor, Department of Economics.
    3. Musharraf Rasool Cyan & Antonios M. Koumpias & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, 2016. "The Effects of Media Campaigns on Individual Attitudes towards Tax Compliance; Quasi-experimental Evidence from Survey Data in Pakistan," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1609, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    4. Florian Diekert & Tillmann Eymess & Joseph Luomba & Israel Waichman, 2022. "The Creation of Social Norms under Weak Institutions," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 9(6), pages 1127-1160.
    5. Brülisauer, Marcel & Goette, Lorenz & Jiang, Zhengyi & Schmitz, Jan & Schubert, Renate, 2020. "Appliance-specific feedback and social comparisons: Evidence from a field experiment on energy conservation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Jacobsen, Catrine & Piovesan, Marco, 2016. "Tax me if you can: An artifactual field experiment on dishonesty," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 7-14.
    7. Syon P. Bhanot & Christina A. Roberto & Anjali Chainani & Charles Williamson & Mehra den Braven, 2019. "Testing effects of loss framing and checklists: evidence from a field experiment on wellness program participation in Philadelphia," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(2), pages 210-222, December.
    8. Jan-Emmanuel De Neve & Clément Imbert & Johannes Spinnewijn & Teodora Tsankova & Maarten Luts, 2021. "How to Improve Tax Compliance? Evidence from Population-Wide Experiments in Belgium," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(5), pages 1425-1463.
    9. Dina Pomeranz & José Vila-Belda, 2019. "Taking State-Capacity Research to the Field: Insights from Collaborations with Tax Authorities," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 755-781, August.
    10. Omar Al-Ubaydli & Faith Fatchen & John List, 2024. "Using Field Experiments to Understand the Impact of Institutions on Economic Growth," Natural Field Experiments 00787, The Field Experiments Website.
    11. Andrew Dustan & Stanislao Maldonado & Juan Manuel Hernandez-Agramonte, 2018. "Motivating bureaucrats with non-monetary incentives when state capacity is weak: Evidence from large-scale field experiments in Peru," Working Papers 136, Peruvian Economic Association.
    12. Maria Vittoria Levati & Ivan Soraperra & Saba Yifredew, 2023. "How to Curb Over-The-Counter Sales of Antibiotics? Evidence from a Field Experiment in Ethiopia," Working Papers 10/2023, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    13. Sylvain Chareyron & David Gray & Yannick L’Horty, 2018. "Raising Take-Up of Social Assistance Benefits through a Simple Mailing: Evidence from a French Field Experiment," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 128(5), pages 777-805.
    14. Martin Brown & Jan Schmitz & Christian Zehnder, 2023. "Moral Constraints, Social Norm Enforcement and Strategic Default in Weak and Strong Economic Conditions," Working Papers 23.03, Swiss National Bank, Study Center Gerzensee.
    15. Marta Serra-Garcia & Nora Szech, 2022. "The (In)Elasticity of Moral Ignorance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 4815-4834, July.
    16. Raúl López-Pérez & Aldo Ramírez-Almudio, 2020. "Why people give to their governments: The role of outcome-oriented norms," Working Papers 2007, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
    17. Jieun Yoo, 2020. "Gratitude and Subjective Well-Being among Koreans," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-10, November.
    18. Löfgren, Åsa & Nordblom, Katarina, 2020. "A theoretical framework of decision making explaining the mechanisms of nudging," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1-12.
    19. Wen, Hong-xing & Wang, Chan & Nie, Pu-yan, 2021. "Acceleration of rural households’ conversion to cleaner cooking fuels: The importance and mechanisms of peer effects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    20. Giorgio Gulino & Federico Masera, 2023. "Contagious Dishonesty: Corruption Scandals and Supermarket Theft," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 218-251, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:kdifoc:44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kdiiikr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.