IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse13/88480.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A new institutional perspective on shared spectrum access issues

Author

Listed:
  • Bunel, Alison
  • Lescop, Denis

Abstract

This paper analyzes the evolution of the Radio Spectrum Management (RSM) institution in Europe in the light of the New Institutional Economics. The paper uses the four levels of institutional analysis framework developed by Williamson to analyze and shed light on limits of the current RSM system. In this paper we focus particularly on the impact of technological change represented by the emergence of Cognitive Radio (CR) on level 2 and 3. The second level of institutional analysis refers to the formal rules of the games (institutional environment). We argue that the shift from exclusive and static to shared and dynamic use of spectrum is an institutional change fostered by the use of CR and the desire to meet spectrum-specific policy objectives. The third level of institutional analysis refers to the play of the game between actors with different objectives and strategies. Here, the reaction of incumbents and potential new entrants are discussed. It is shown that actors who want the change are trying to shape the rules of the game in order to get a competitive advantage whereas incumbents resist to the change. We conclude with main themes discussions and issues for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Bunel, Alison & Lescop, Denis, 2013. "A new institutional perspective on shared spectrum access issues," 24th European Regional ITS Conference, Florence 2013 88480, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse13:88480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/88480/1/773358005.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baldini, Gianmarco & Holland, Oliver & Stavroulaki, Vera & Tsagkaris, Kostas & Demestichas, Panagiotis & Polydoros, Andreas & Karanasios, Stan & Allen, David, 2013. "The evolution of cognitive radio technology in Europe: Regulatory and standardization aspects," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 96-107.
    2. Barrie, Matthias & Delaere, Simon & Anker, Peter & Ballon, Pieter, 2012. "Aligning technology, business and regulatory scenarios for cognitive radio," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 546-559.
    3. Michael G. Jacobides, 2006. "The architecture and design of organizational capabilities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 15(1), pages 151-171, February.
    4. Brousseau,Éric & Glachant,Jean-Michel (ed.), 2008. "New Institutional Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521876605, November.
    5. Brousseau,Éric & Glachant,Jean-Michel (ed.), 2008. "New Institutional Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521700160, November.
    6. Isabelle Huault & V. Perret & S. Charreire-Petit, 2007. "Management," Post-Print halshs-00337676, HAL.
    7. Durantini, Annalisa & Martino, Mauro, 2013. "The spectrum policy reform paving the way to cognitive radio enabled spectrum sharing," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 87-95.
    8. Crocioni, Pietro, 2009. "Is allowing trading enough? Making secondary markets in spectrum work," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 451-468, September.
    9. Mwangoka, Joseph W. & Marques, Paulo & Rodriguez, Jonathan, 2013. "TV white spaces exploitation through a bicameral geo-location database," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 116-129.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Locatelli & Sylvain Rossiaud, 2011. "A neoinstitutionalist interpretation of the changes in the Russian oil model," Post-Print halshs-00631115, HAL.
    2. Erdogdu, Erkan, 2013. "A cross-country analysis of electricity market reforms: Potential contribution of New Institutional Economics," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 239-251.
    3. Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley, 2010. "The Contribution of Douglass North to New Institutional Economics," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00654327, HAL.
    4. Jean-Michel Glachant, 2012. "Regulating Networks in the New Economy," Review of Economics and Institutions, Università di Perugia, vol. 3(1).
    5. Michael Regan, 2017. "Capital Markets, Infrastructure Investment and Growth in the Asia Pacific Region," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-28, February.
    6. Milton Fernando Montoya (Editor), 2017. "Trends and challenges in electricity and oil regulation," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 949, November.
    7. Simon Hull & Jennifer Whittal, 2021. "Do Design Science Research and Design Thinking Processes Improve the ‘Fit’ of the Fit-For-Purpose Approach to Securing Land Tenure for All in South Africa?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-26, May.
    8. Martin Kniepert, 2014. "Die (Neue) Institutionenökonomik als Ansatz für einen erweiterten, offeneren Zugang zur Volkswirtschaftslehre," Working Papers 552014, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    9. El-Bialy, Nora, 2010. "The role of institutions within the IPR enforcement: The case of de facto software protection in Egypt," Discussion Papers on Strategy and Innovation 10-02, Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Technology and Innovation Management (TIM).
    10. Marco Furlotti & Giuseppe Soda, 2018. "Fit for the Task: Complementarity, Asymmetry, and Partner Selection in Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 837-854, October.
    11. Rabah Belaïd & Farid Gasmi & Laura Recuero Virto, 2009. "La qualité des institutions influence-t-elle la performance économique ? Le cas des télécommunications dans les pays en voie de développement," Revue d’économie du développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 17(3), pages 51-81.
    12. Pagano, Ugo & Vatiero, Massimiliano, 2015. "Costly institutions as substitutes: novelty and limits of the Coasian approach," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 265-281, June.
    13. repec:zbw:inwedp:552014 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Evelyn Dietsche, 2017. "New industrial policy and the extractive industries," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-161, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    15. Mike, Károly, 2016. "Merre vezessen a magyar kapitalizmus útja?. Látkép Ronald Coase világítótornyából [Which course for Hungary s capitalism?. A view from Ronald Coase s lighthouse]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 597-614.
    16. Barbara ANTONIOLI & Antonio MASSARUTTO, 2012. "The Municipal Waste Management Sector In Europe: Shifting Boundaries Between Public Service And The Market," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 83(4), pages 505-532, December.
    17. François Facchini, 2011. "Economic freedom in Muslim countries : an explanation using the theory of institutional path dependency," Post-Print halshs-00587694, HAL.
    18. Krol, Noortje & Polman, Nico & Peerlings, Jack & Nikolov, Dimitre, 2010. "Changing governance in the EU milk supply chain," IAMO Forum 2010: Institutions in Transition – Challenges for New Modes of Governance 52703, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO).
    19. Gani Aldashev & Imane Chaara & Jean-Philippe Platteau & Zaki Wahhaj, 2012. "Formal Law as a Magnet to Reform Custom," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 60(4), pages 795-828.
    20. Ruzica Simic Banovic, 2015. "(Former) Informal Networks As A Reflection Of Informal Institutions In East European Transitional Societies: Legacy Or Opportunism?," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 10(1), pages 179-205, March.
    21. Klaus Heine & Maximilian Kerk, 2017. "Conflict resolution in meta-organizations: the peculiar role of arbitration," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse13:88480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.