IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/imfswp/37.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Capital adequacy regulation of financial conglomerates in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Yoo, Y. Emilie

Abstract

Over the past few decades, changes in market conditions such as globalisation and deregulation of financial markets as well as product innovation and technical advancements have induced financial institutions to expand their business activities beyond their traditional boundaries and to engage in cross-sectoral operations. As combining different sectoral businesses offers opportunities for operational synergies and diversification benefits, financial groups comprising banks, insurance undertakings and/or investment firms, usually referred to as financial conglomerates, have rapidly emerged, providing a wide range of services and products in distinct financial sectors and oftentimes in different geographic locations. In the European Union (EU), financial conglomerates have become part of the biggest and most active financial market participants in recent years. Financial conglomerates generally pose new problems for financial authorities as they can raise new risks and exacerbate existing ones. In particular, their cross-sectoral business activities can involve prudentially substantial risks such as the risk of regulatory arbitrage and contagion risk arising from intra-group transactions. Moreover, the generally large size of financial conglomerates as well as the high complexity and interconnectedness of their corporate structures and risk exposures can entail substantial systemic risk and can therefore threaten the stability of the financial system as a whole. Until a few years ago, there was no supervisory framework in place which addressed a financial conglomerate in its entirety as a group. Instead, each group entity within a financial conglomerate was subject to the supervisory rules of its pertinent sector only. Such silo supervisory approach had the drawback of not taking account of risks which arise or aggravate at the group level. It also failed to consider how the risks from different business lines within the group interrelate with each other and affect the group as a whole. In order to address this lack of group-wide prudential supervision of financial conglomerates, the European legislator adopted the Financial Conglomerates Directive 2002/87/EC8 (‘FCD’) on 16 December 2002. The FCD was transposed into national law in the member states of the EU (‘Member States’) by 11 August 2004 for application to financial years beginning on 1 January 2005 and after. The FCD primarily aims at supplementing the existing sectoral directives to address the additional risks of concentration, contagion and complexity presented by financial conglomerates. It therefore provides for a supervisory framework which is applicable in addition to the sectoral supervision. Most importantly, the FCD has introduced additional capital requirements at the conglomerate level so as to prevent the multiple use of the same capital by different group entities. This paper seeks to examine to what extent the FCD provides for an adequate capital regulation of financial conglomerates in the EU while taking into account the underlying sectoral capital requirements and the inherent risks associated with financial conglomerates. In Part 1, the definition and the basic corporate models of financial conglomerates will be presented (I), followed by an illustration of the core motives behind the phenomenon of financial conglomeration (II) and an overview of the development of the supervision over financial conglomerates in the EU (III). Part 2 begins with a brief elaboration on the role of regulatory capital (I) and gives a general overview of the EU capital requirements applicable to banks and insurance undertakings respectively. A delineation of the commonalities and differences of the banking and the insurance capital requirements will be provided (II). It continues to further examine the need for a group-wide capital regulation of financial conglomerates and analyses the adequacy of the FCD capital requirements. In this context, the technical advice rendered by the Joint Committee on Financial Conglomerates (JCFC) as well as the currently ongoing legislative reforms at the EU level will be discussed (III). The paper finally closes with a conclusion and an outlook on remaining open issues (IV).

Suggested Citation

  • Yoo, Y. Emilie, 2010. "Capital adequacy regulation of financial conglomerates in the European Union," IMFS Working Paper Series 37, Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute for Monetary and Financial Stability (IMFS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:imfswp:37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/97762/1/IMFS_WP_37.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hennie Van Greuning & Sonja Brajovic Bratanovic, 2003. "Analyzing and Managing Banking Risk : A Framework for Assessing Corporate Governance and Financial Risk Management, Second Edition," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14949.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carmen Orden‐Cruz & Jessica Paule‐Vianez & Júlio Lobão, 2023. "The effect of Economic Policy Uncertainty on the credit risk of US commercial banks," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 3420-3436, July.
    2. Reaz, Mazrur & Arun, Thankom G., 2005. "Corporate Governance in Developing Economies: Perspective from the Banking Sector in Bangladesh," Development Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 30545, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    3. Tomáš Šťastný & Tomáš Čech, 2013. "Capital Requirements Directive IV and Basel 3 - Benefits, New Rules and Their Impact [Capital Requirements Directive IV A Basel 3 - prínosy, nové pravidlá a ich dopad]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(6), pages 45-64.
    4. Sekoni, Abiola, 2015. "The Basic Concepts and Feature of Bank Liquidity and Its Risk," MPRA Paper 67389, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Tomáš Šťastný, 2013. "Banking union - the way to the stronger financial system," Ekonomika a Management, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(3), pages 74-83.
    6. El-Hawary, Dahlia & Grais, Wafik & Iqbal, Zamir, 2007. "Diversity in the regulation of Islamic Financial Institutions," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 778-800, February.
    7. Lucian Ciprian Crisan, 2014. "The Stress Test - A New Challenge For The Banking Union," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 0702690, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    8. Alex Bara & Pierre LeRoux, 2018. "Technology, Financial Innovations and Bank Behavior in a Low Income Country," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(4), pages 221-234.
    9. Rim Zouari‐Hadiji, 2023. "Financial innovation characteristics and banking performance: The mediating effect of risk management," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1214-1227, April.
    10. Robert Arasa, 2015. "Determinants of Know Your Customer (KYC) Compliance among Commercial Banks in Kenya," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(2), pages 162-175.
    11. Prof. R.W Gakure & John Karanja Ngugi & Peter Musangi Ndwiga & Simon Maina Waithaka, 2012. "Effect 0f Credit Risk Management Techniques 0n The Performance 0f Unsecured Bank Loans Employed Commercial Banks In Kenya," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 2(4), pages 221-236, August.
    12. Maria-Eleni K. Agoraki & Manthos D. Delis & Panagiotis K. Staikouras, 2010. "The effect of board size and composition on bank efficiency," International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(4), pages 357-386.
    13. Paola Leone & Carmen Gallucci & Rosalia Santulli, 2021. "How Does Corporate Governance Affect Bank Performance? The Mediating Role of Risk Governance," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(10), pages 212-212, July.
    14. Mehmood, Asad & De Luca, Francesco, 2023. "How does non-interest income affect bank credit risk? Evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    15. Jihen Bouslimi & Abdelaziz Hakimi & Taha Zaghdoudi & Kais Tissaoui, 2024. "The complex relationship between credit and liquidity risks: a linear and non-linear analysis for the banking sector," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    16. Sufi Faizan Ahmed & Qaisar Ali Malik, 2015. "Credit Risk Management and Loan Performance: Empirical Investigation of Micro Finance Banks of Pakistan," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 5(2), pages 574-579.
    17. Boutheina Hachem & Hiyam Sujud, 2018. "Islamic Versus Conventional Banks in Lebanon: An Empirical Study of Credit Risk Management," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(8), pages 1-53, August.
    18. Sekoni, Abiola, 2015. "Germane Issues and Physiognomies of Bank Liquidity Risk," MPRA Paper 67399, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Kheiri Chari , Mohammad & Aliheidari Bioki , Tahereh & Khademizare , Hasan, 2013. "The New Method for Ranking Grouped Credit Customer Based on DEA Method," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 8(4), pages 75-98, October.
    20. Roger Owusu-Boafo & Ernest Obeng & Jone Yeobah Addo, 2020. "The Relationship Between Credit Risk Management and the Profitability of Banks in Ghana," ACTA VSFS, University of Finance and Administration, vol. 14(2), pages 92-114.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:imfswp:37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hoffmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.