IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkwp/1216.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Erneute EU-Agrarreform: Umbau statt Abbau von Subventionen

Author

Listed:
  • Schrader, Jörg-Volker

Abstract

In dem Papier werden die Reformbeschlüsse zur europäischen Agrarpolitik vom Juni 2003 diskutiert. Im Mittelpunkt der Beschlüsse steht die Entkoppelung der Prämienzahlungen von der Produktion. Damit werden Produktionsanreize für die Landwirte abgebaut und es dürfte zu einer Allokationsverbesserung kommen. Die Zahlungen werden allerdings insgesamt kaum reduziert, sondern lediglich partiell zu Gunsten der ländlichen Entwicklungspolitik, der Agrarumweltpolitik und für Tierschutzmaßnahmen umgeschichtet. Da eine sachlich akzeptable Begründung für permanente Zahlungen an Landwirte fehlt, wäre ein schneller Abbau aller Subventionen der richtige Weg. Die Ausweitung der Mittel für ländliche Entwicklung ist schon deshalb der falsche Weg, weil es wiederum vor allem um punktuelle Interventionen zu Gunsten von Landwirten geht.

Suggested Citation

  • Schrader, Jörg-Volker, 2004. "Erneute EU-Agrarreform: Umbau statt Abbau von Subventionen," Kiel Working Papers 1216, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkwp:1216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/17765/1/kap1216.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isermeyer, Folkhard, 2003. "Umsetzung des Luxemburger Beschlusses zur EU-Agrarreform in Deutschland - eine erste Einschätzung," Arbeitsberichte aus der vTI-Agrarökonomie 03/2003, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    2. Koester, Ulrich, 2003. "EU-Agrarreform: endlich ein Durchbruch?," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 83(3), pages 151-156.
    3. Hobbs, A. L. & Hobbs, J. E. & Isaac, G. E. & Kerr, W. A., 2002. "Ethics, domestic food policy and trade law: assessing the EU animal welfare proposal to the WTO," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(5-6), pages 437-454.
    4. Schrader, Jörg-Volker, 1994. "Nachwachsende Rohstoffe: Umweltfreundlicher Weg aus der Agrarkrise oder neues Subventionsloch?," Kiel Discussion Papers 238, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Isermeyer, Folkhard, 2001. "Die Agrarwende - was kann die Politik tun?," Arbeitsberichte aus der vTI-Agrarökonomie 02/2001, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    6. Schrader, Jörg-Volker, 1993. "EG-Agrarreform und GATT-Vereinbarungen: Vom Leistungseinkommen zur Quasi-Rente," Kiel Discussion Papers 217, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boss, Alfred & Rosenschon, Astrid, 2008. "Der Kieler Subventionsbericht: eine Aktualisierung," Kiel Discussion Papers 452/453, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Boss, Alfred & Rosenschon, Astrid, 2002. "Subventionen in Deutschland: Quantifizierung und finanzpolitische Bewertung," Kiel Discussion Papers 392/393, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Kilian, Stefan & Salhofer, Klaus, 2008. "Single Payments of the CAP: Where Do the Rents Go?," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 9(2).
    4. Boss, Alfred & Rosenschon, Astrid, 1998. "Subventionen in Deutschland," Kiel Discussion Papers 320, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Kilian, Stefan & Salhofer, Klaus, 2009. "Entkoppelte Prämien, Bodenpreise und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 58(03), pages 1-3, April.
    6. Koester, Ulrich, 2001. "Grundsätze für eine Neuausrichtung der Agrarpolitik," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(04), pages 1-3.
    7. Voneki, Eva, 2004. "Zur Bewertung Des Ungarischen Sapard-Programms Unter Besonderer Berucksichtigung Der Investitionen Im Milchsektor," IAMO Discussion Papers 14874, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    8. Joshua Frank, 2007. "Wages and Bottlenecks: Free Trade, Ethics, and Information: Reconciling International Trade with National Ethical Standards," Papers of the Annual IUE-SUNY Cortland Conference in Economics, in: Oguz Esen & Ayla Ogus (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Globalization and Its Discontents, pages 53-63, Izmir University of Economics.
    9. Henning, Christian H.C.A., 2003. "Entkoppelte Direktzahlungen: Meilenstein auf dem Weg zu einer rationalen Wirtschaftspolitik und politische Entwaffnung der Agrarlobbyisten?," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 52(03), pages 1-3.
    10. Offermann, Frank & Bertelsmeier, Marcus & Kleinhanß, Werner, 2003. "Auswirkungen der Mid-term Review Beschlüsse unter besonderer Berücksichtigung einer Teilentkopplung der Rinderprämien: Studie im Auftrag des BMVEL," Arbeitsberichte aus der vTI-Agrarökonomie 06/2003, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    11. Feil, Jan-Henning & Mußhoff, Oliver & Roeren-Wiemers, Tobias, 2013. "Einzelbetriebliche Auswirkungen politischer Strukturreformen in der Landwirtschaft: Erste empirische Erkenntnisse," Structural Change in Agriculture/Strukturwandel im Agrarsektor (SiAg) Working Papers 158268, Humboldt University Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    12. Vőneki, Éva, 2004. "Zur Bewertung des ungarischen SAPARD-Programms unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Investitionen im Milchsektor," IAMO Discussion Papers 59, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    13. Gong, Binlei, 2018. "Interstate competition in agriculture: Cheer or fear? Evidence from the United States and China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 37-47.
    14. Frank, Joshua, 2006. "Process attributes of goods, ethical considerations and implications for animal products," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 538-547, June.
    15. Sahrbacher, Christoph, 2011. "Regional structural change in European agriculture: Effects of decoupling and EU accession," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 60, number 60.
    16. Bertelsmeier, M., 2004. "Analyse der Wirkungen unterschiedlicher Systeme von direkten Transferzahlungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Bodenpacht- und Quotenmärkten," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 39.
    17. Osterburg, Bernhard & Nitsch, Heike & Kristensen, Lone, 2005. "Environmental Standards and Their Linkage to Support Instruments of the EU Common Agricultural Policy," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24521, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Hobbs, Jill E., 2010. "Public and Private Standards for Food Safety and Quality: International Trade Implications," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, May.
    19. William A. Kerr, 2010. "What is New in Protectionism? Consumers, Cranks, and Captives," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 58(1), pages 5-22, March.
    20. Langhammer, Rolf J., 1994. "Nach dem Ende der Uruguay-Runde: Das GATT am Ende?," Kiel Discussion Papers 228, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EU- Agrarreform; Landnutzung; Bodenrenten; EU Erweiterung; ländliche Entwicklung;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R52 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Land Use and Other Regulations
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q2 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkwp:1216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.