IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkie/788.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Marktzutrittsbarrieren in den USA und Kanada: Der Markt für meerestechnische Güter und Dienstleistungen

Author

Listed:
  • Foders, Federico
  • Stoll, Peter-Tobias
  • Townsend-Gault, Ian
  • Wolfrum, Rüdiger

Abstract

Die derzeit angespannten handelspolitischen Beziehungen zwischen Europa und den Vereinigten Staaten werfen die Frage nach dem tatsächlichen Protektionsgrad auf, mit dem international tätige deutsche Unternehmen in Nordamerika konfrontiert werden. Würde in Nordamerika eine Abschottungspolitik verfolgt, so träfe sie am ehesten deutsche Branchen, die – wie die rohstoffbezogene meerestechnische Industrie – besonders intensiv auf Auslandsmärkte angewiesen sind. Vor diesem Hintergrund hat der Bundesminister für Wirtschaft dem Institut für Weltwirtschaft einen Forschungsauftrag zum Thema "Hemmnisse in den USA und Kanada für den Zugang ausländischer Unternehmen zu Offshore-Aktivitäten und die Lieferung meerestechnischer Anlagen und Geräte" erteilt. Ziel dieses Forschungsprojektes war es, zu untersuchen, ob in den Vereinigten Staaten und Kanada Hemmnisse für den Zugang ausländischer Unternehmen zum Markt für Meerestechnik bestehen, derartige Hemmnisse gegebenenfalls darzustellen und ihre potentiellen Auswirkungen auf die deutsche Meereswirtschaft zu analysieren. In dieser Studie, die aus dem Forschungsauftrag hervorgegangen ist, wird zunächst dargelegt, welches Recht in den relevanten Meeresgebieten derzeit gilt. Ein Überblick über die Ressourcenausstattung und deren bisherige Nutzung sowie eine eingehende Analyse der nordamerikanischen Märkte für meerestechnische Erzeugnisse und Dienstleistungen schließt sich an. Danach werden die Rahmenbedingungen für ausländische Unternehmen herausgearbeitet und mit den für Inländer geltenden Bedingungen verglichen, um festzustellen, ob und inwieweit deutsche Unternehmen benachteiligt werden. Die so identifizierten Diskriminierungen werden dann aus ökonomischer und rechtlicher Sicht bewertet. Abschließend werden die wichtigsten Ergebnisse zusammengefaßt und mit einigen wirtschafts- und rechtspolitischen Empfehlungen verknüpft.

Suggested Citation

  • Foders, Federico & Stoll, Peter-Tobias & Townsend-Gault, Ian & Wolfrum, Rüdiger, 1993. "Marktzutrittsbarrieren in den USA und Kanada: Der Markt für meerestechnische Güter und Dienstleistungen," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 788, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkie:788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/788/1/132181657.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcus Noland & Bela Balassa, 1988. "Japan in the World Economy," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 0412, April.
    2. Langhammer, Rolf J., 1992. "The NAFTA: another futile trade area (AFTA) or a serious approach towards regionalism?," Kiel Discussion Papers 195, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Kravis, Irving B & Lipsey, Robert E, 1992. "Sources of Competitiveness of the United States and of Its Multinational Firms," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 74(2), pages 193-201, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Foders, Federico, 1995. "The technological specialization of Europe in the 1990s," Kiel Working Papers 675, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Steven W. Popper & Caroline S. Wagner, 2003. "Identifying critical technologies in the United States: a review of the federal effort," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2-3), pages 113-128.
    3. Kazuo Sato, 1991. "Japan's Resource Imports," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 513(1), pages 76-89, January.
    4. Morgenroth, Edgar & FitzGerald, John & FitzGerald, John, 2006. "Summary and Conclusions," Book Chapters, in: Morgenroth, Edgar (ed.),Ex-Ante Evaluation of the Investment Priorities for the National Development Plan 2007-2013, chapter 24, pages 317-333, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
      • Baker, Terence J. & FitzGerald, John & Honohan, Patrick & FitzGerald, John & Honohan, Patrick, 1996. "Summary and Conclusions," Book Chapters, in: Baker, Terence J. (ed.),Economic Implications for Ireland of EMU, chapter 12, pages 339-352, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    5. Yongzheng Yang, 2006. "China's Integration into the World Economy: implications for developing countries," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 20(1), pages 40-56, May.
    6. Fors, Gunnar & Svensson, Roger, 2002. "R&D and foreign sales in Swedish multinationals: a simultaneous relationship?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 95-107, January.
    7. Stehn, Jürgen, 1993. "America's departure from multilateralism: Highway or dirt road to freer trade?," Kiel Discussion Papers 212, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    8. Marcus Noland & Howard Pack, 2002. "Industrial Policies and Growth: Lessons From International Experience," Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies Book Series, in: Norman Loayza & Raimundo Soto & Norman Loayza (Series Editor) & Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel (Series Editor) (ed.),Economic Growth: Sources, Trends, and Cycles, edition 1, volume 6, chapter 9, pages 251-308, Central Bank of Chile.
    9. Robert Z. Lawrence, 1991. "How Open is Japan?," NBER Chapters, in: Trade with Japan: Has the Door Opened Wider?, pages 9-50, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Lee, Seung-Hyun & Makhija, Mona & Paik, Yongsun, 2008. "The value of real options investments under abnormal uncertainty: The case of the Korean economic crisis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 16-34, January.
    11. Traill, Bruce & da Silva, Joao Gomes, 1996. "Measuring international competitiveness: The case of the European food industry," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 151-166, April.
    12. Jeffrey A. Frankel, 1991. "Japanese Finance in the 1980s: A Survey," NBER Chapters, in: Trade with Japan: Has the Door Opened Wider?, pages 225-270, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Robert Z. Lawrence, 1993. "Japan's Different Trade Regime: An Analysis with Particular Reference to Seiretsu," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 7(3), pages 3-19, Summer.
    14. Dick Bryan, 2001. "Global accumulation and accounting for national economic identity," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 57-77, March.
    15. , Aisdl, 2016. "The Relationship between Innovation Capabilities and Efficiency of Foreign Invested Enterprises in Vietnam," OSF Preprints j78cs, Center for Open Science.
    16. Hans-Jurgen Engelbrecht, 1995. "The impact of international trade on the 'in-house' transaction sector: evidence from the United States, 1985-89," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 60-63.
    17. Böhringer, Christoph & Garcia-Muros, Xaquin & Cazcarro, Ignacio & Arto, Iñaki, 2017. "The efficiency cost of protective measures in climate policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 446-454.
    18. Man, Thomas W. Y. & Lau, Theresa & Chan, K. F., 2002. "The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises: A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 123-142, March.
    19. Kazuo Sato, 1995. "Economic Growth, Foreign Trade, and Trade Policy in Japan," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(2), pages 193-217, March.
    20. Giancarlo Corsetti & John Flemming & Seppo Honkapohja & Willi Leibfritz & Gilles Saint-Paul & Hans-Werner Sinn & Xavier Vives, 2002. "Growth and Productivity," EEAG Report on the European Economy, CESifo, vol. 0, pages 57-70, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkie:788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.