IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkie/2856.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Leitlinien einer ökonomischen Verfassung für Europa

Author

Listed:
  • Stehn, Jürgen

Abstract

Auf dem Gipfel in Laeken im Dezember 2001 hat der Europäische Rat die Einrichtung eines Europäischen Konvents beschlossen, der sich mit Zukunftsfragen der Europäischen Union (EU) beschäftigen und Leitlinien für die nächste intergouvermentale Konferenz erarbeiten soll. Im Mittelpunkt der Konventsarbeit stehen die folgenden Fragen: Was erwarten die Bürger Europas von der Europäischen Union? Wie sollen die politischen und ökonomischen Kompetenzen zwischen der EU und den Mitgliedstaaten aufgeteilt werden? Welchen Institutionen sollen der EU zufallende Kompetenzen zugeordnet werden? Diese Verfassungsdebatte ist von besonderer Bedeutung, da immer mehr Menschen in Europa mit Misstrauen auf die wachsenden Kompetenzen der EU-Institutionen blicken und daher gute politische und ökonomische Gründe für eine weitere Zentralisierung von Kompetenzen fordern. Das Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, eine ökonomische Grundlage für die kommenden Diskussionen im Europäischen Konvent zu erarbeiten. Zunächst wird – basierend auf der Theorie des fiskalischen Föderalismus – ein Referenzsystem für eine ökonomisch optimale Verteilung von Kompetenzen innerhalb einer supranationalen Gemeinschaft wie der EU entworfen. Ausgehend von dieser theoretischen Analyse werden dann Leitlinien für eine Zuordnung ökonomischer Kompetenzen in den wichtigsten Politikbereichen der EU skizziert.

Suggested Citation

  • Stehn, Jürgen, 2002. "Leitlinien einer ökonomischen Verfassung für Europa," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 2856, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkie:2856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/2856/1/Ste_Leitlinien_Verfassung.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Alesina & Ignazio Angeloni & Ludger Schuknecht, 2005. "What does the European Union do?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 123(3), pages 275-319, June.
    2. Laaser Claus-Friedrich & Stehn Jürgen, 1996. "Marktwirtschaft und Subsidiarität: Die föderative Arbeitsteilung auf dem Prüfstand," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 45(1), pages 58-91, April.
    3. Henning Klodt, 2001. "Conflicts and Conflict Resolution in International Anti‐trust: Do We Need International Competition Rules?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(7), pages 877-888, July.
    4. Rubinfeld, Daniel L., 1987. "The economics of the local public sector," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 11, pages 571-645, Elsevier.
    5. Olson, Mancur, Jr, 1969. "The Principle of "Fiscal Equivalence": The Division of Responsibilities among Different Levels of Government," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 479-487, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krieger-Boden, Christiane, 2002. "European integration and the case for compensatory regional policy," Kiel Working Papers 1135, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Stehn, Jürgen, 2017. "Das Kern-Problem der EU," Kiel Policy Brief 106, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Schweickert, Rainer, 2005. "Vor der nächsten Erweiterung - Herausforderungen und Reformbedarf der EU," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 3667, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stehn, Jürgen, 2002. "Towards a European constitution: fiscal federalism and the allocation of economic competences," Kiel Working Papers 1125, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Stehn, Jürgen, 2004. "Wettbewerbsaufsicht in der EU: Zentralisierung oder Dezentralisierung?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 3373, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Faggini, Marisa & Parziale, Anna, 2011. "Fitness landscape and tax planning: NK model for fiscal federalism," MPRA Paper 33770, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Weingast, Barry R., 2009. "Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 279-293, May.
    5. Rudloff, Bettina, 2002. "Agrarumweltpolitik nach dem Subsidiaritätsprinzip - Föderalismustheoretische Grundlagen zur Politikgestaltung," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 51(05), pages 1-10.
    6. Schäfer Wolf, 2007. "Europäische Union: Erweiterung cum Vertiefung? Erweiterung versus Vertiefung! / European Union: Enlarging cum Deepening? Enlarging versus Deepening!," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 58(1), pages 51-66, January.
    7. Krieger-Boden, Christiane, 2002. "European integration and the case for compensatory regional policy," ERSA conference papers ersa02p240, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Sinabell, Franz & Schmid, Erwin & Pitlik, Hans, 2009. "Farm Payments in the EU – their Distribution and Justification," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51800, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Sichelschmidt, H., 1999. "The EU programme "trans-European networks"--a critical assessment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 169-181, July.
    10. Huberto M. Ennis & Santiago M. Pinto & Alberto Porto, 2006. "Choosing a place to live and a workplace," Económica, Departamento de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, vol. 0(1-2), pages 15-51, January-D.
      • Huberto M. Ennis & Santiago M. Pinto & Alberto Porto, 2006. "Choosing a place to live and a workplace," Económica, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, vol. 0(1-2), pages 15-51, January-D.
    11. Fritz Breuss & Markus Eller, 2004. "The Optimal Decentralisation of Government Activity: Normative Recommendations for the European Constitution," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 27-76, March.
    12. Leonardo Letelier, 1993. "La Teoría del Federalismo Fiscal y su Relevancia en el Caso Municipal Chileno," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 30(90), pages 199-224.
    13. Kirschke, Dieter & Hager, Astrid & Jechlitschka, Kurt & Wegener, Stefan, 2005. "Co-financing Implications for Regional Policy-Making: A Case Study for the Agri-environmental Programme in Saxony-Anhalt," Structural Change and Transition in the Agricultural Sector/ Strukturwandel und Transformation im Agrarbereich (SUTRA) Working Papers 18814, Humboldt University Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    14. Stephen Billings & Thomas Thibodeau, 2011. "Intrametropolitan Decentralization: Is Government Structure Capitalized in Residential Property Values?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 416-450, May.
    15. Iain Begg, 2009. "Regulation and Supervision of Financial Intermediaries in the EU: The Aftermath of the Financial Crisis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 1107-1128, November.
    16. Matthieu Leprince & Sonia Paty & Emmanuelle Reulier, 2005. "Choix d'imposition et interactions spatiales entre collectivités locales. Un test sur les départements français," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 71(1), pages 67-93.
    17. George R. Zodrow, 2019. "Intrajurisdictional Capitalization and the Incidence of the Property Tax," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: George R Zodrow (ed.), TAXATION IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Selected Essays of George R. Zodrow, chapter 16, pages 489-522, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    18. Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge & McNab, Robert M., 2003. "Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(9), pages 1597-1616, September.
    19. Wildasin, David E. & Wilson, John Douglas, 1996. "Imperfect mobility and local government behaviour in an overlapping-generations model," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 177-198, May.
    20. Bernhard Seidel & Dieter Vesper, 1999. "Fiscal Federalism: An International Comparison," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 183, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkie:2856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.