IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkbw/31.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Industrielle Strukturen und Potentiale im Norden: Eine regionale Analyse der deutsch-dänischen Industrielandschaft

Author

Listed:
  • Schrader, Klaus
  • Laaser, Claus-Friedrich

Abstract

In der Studie, die im Rahmen des nordwärts-Projekts erstellt wurde, wird das in Norddeutschland zu beobachtende Gefälle bei der Wirtschaftskraft mit strukturellen Ursachen erklärt. Aufgrund der relativ hohen Wachstumsbeiträge des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes und der unternehmensnahen Dienstleistungen bleiben die industrieschwachen Flächenländer Schleswig-Holstein und Mecklenburg-Vorpommern hinter dem Bundesdurchschnitt zurück, woran auch die Schwäche der Industrie während Pandemie und abflauender Weltkonjunktur wenig ändert. Die Autoren zeigen, dass diese grundlegenden Zusammenhänge der Wirtschaftsentwicklung auch in Dänemark zu beobachten sind, wo hinter der deutsch-dänischen Grenze in Jütland das industrielles Zentrum Dänemarks liegt. Trotz struktureller Unterschiede ergeben sich in der deutsch-dänischen Nachbarschaft relevante industrielle Schnittstellen auf Branchenebene, etwa bei Ernährung und Maschinenbau. Eine regional tiefergehende Analyse auf Kreisebene zeigt, dass in Schleswig-Holstein die regionale Bedeutung des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes in den Kreisen des Hamburger Umlands am größten ist, während im Landesteil Schleswig, aber auch im östlichen Holstein die Industrie ein geringes Gewicht hat. Erst in den jütländischen Festlandsregionen ist der Industrialisierungsgrad wieder deutlich höher. Die Unterschiede bei den Wirtschaftsstrukturen in der deutsch-dänischen Grenzregion werden auch mit der Landesgrenze als regulativer Trennmauer erklärt. Die Autoren empfehlen eine stärkere wirtschaftspolitische Kooperation, die Ansatzpunkte in der industrienahen Bildungslandschaft, der Wirtschaftsförderung und der Regulierungspraxis finden könnte.

Suggested Citation

  • Schrader, Klaus & Laaser, Claus-Friedrich, 2020. "Industrielle Strukturen und Potentiale im Norden: Eine regionale Analyse der deutsch-dänischen Industrielandschaft," Kieler Beiträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik 31, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkbw:31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/226031/1/1737434814.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 170-192, March.
    2. J. M. C. Santos Silva & Silvana Tenreyro, 2006. "The Log of Gravity," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 88(4), pages 641-658, November.
    3. Robert C. Feenstra & James R. Markusen & Andrew K. Rose, 2001. "Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 430-447, May.
    4. Schrader, Klaus & Laaser, Claus-Friedrich & Soltwedel, Rüdiger & Bickenbach, Frank & Sichelschmidt, Henning & Wolf, Hartmut, 2008. "Neue Wege der Kooperation: Schleswig-Holstein und Hamburg in einer gemeinsamen Wirtschaftsregion," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 4280, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Schrader, Klaus & Laaser, Claus-Friedrich, 2019. "Unterschiede in der Wirtschaftsentwicklung im Norden und Süden Deutschlands," Kieler Beiträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik 20, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    6. Schrader, Klaus & Laaser, Claus-Friedrich, 2019. "Schleswig-Holsteins Wirtschaft in Zeiten des Aufschwungs - eine Bestandsaufnahme," Kieler Beiträge zur Wirtschaftspolitik 21, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Head, Keith & Mayer, Thierry, 2014. "Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook," Handbook of International Economics, in: Gopinath, G. & Helpman, . & Rogoff, K. (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 0, pages 131-195, Elsevier.
    2. Chen, Natalie & Novy, Dennis, 2008. "International Trade Integration: A Disaggregated Approach," CEPR Discussion Papers 7103, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Do, Quy-Toan & Levchenko, Andrei A., 2007. "Comparative advantage, demand for external finance, and financial development," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 796-834, December.
    4. Raphaël Chiappini, 2016. "Do overseas investments create or replace trade? New insights from a macro-sectoral study on Japan," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 403-425, June.
    5. Do, Quy-Toan & Levchenko, Andrei A. & Raddatz, Claudio, 2016. "Comparative advantage, international trade, and fertility," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 48-66.
    6. Felix Groba, 2014. "Determinants of trade with solar energy technology components: evidence on the porter hypothesis?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(5), pages 503-526, February.
    7. Dennis Novy, 2013. "Gravity Redux: Measuring International Trade Costs With Panel Data," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 51(1), pages 101-121, January.
    8. Fracasso, Andrea, 2014. "A gravity model of virtual water trade," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 215-228.
    9. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/dambferfb7dfprc9m01g1j1k2 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. F. Karam & C. Zaki, 2013. "On the determinants of trade in services: evidence from the MENA region," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(33), pages 4662-4676, November.
    11. Jacks, David S. & Meissner, Christopher M. & Novy, Dennis, 2011. "Trade booms, trade busts, and trade costs," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 185-201, March.
    12. Zongo, Amara, 2020. "The Impact of Restrictive Measures on Bilateral FDI in OECD Countries," MPRA Paper 101929, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Zhang, Daowei & Li, Yanshu, 2009. "Forest endowment, logging restrictions, and China's wood products trade," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 46-53, March.
    14. Martinez-Zarzoso Inma & Márquez-Ramos Laura, 2008. "The Effect of Trade Facilitation on Sectoral Trade," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-46, September.
    15. Felix Groba & Jing Cao, 2015. "Chinese Renewable Energy Technology Exports: The Role of Policy, Innovation and Markets," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 60(2), pages 243-283, February.
    16. Andre Jungmittag & Robert Marschinski, 2023. "Service trade restrictiveness and foreign direct investment—Evidence from greenfield FDI in business services," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 1711-1758, June.
    17. Mahvash S Qureshi, 2008. "Africa’s Oil Abundance and External Competitiveness: Do Institutions Matter?," IMF Working Papers 2008/172, International Monetary Fund.
    18. Brülhart, Marius & Trionfetti, Federico, 2009. "A test of trade theories when expenditure is home biased," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 830-845, October.
    19. Zhang, Daowei & Nguyen, Ly, 2018. "Tariff and U.S. Paper Products Trade," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266771, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    20. Stephen J. Redding & David E. Weinstein, 2019. "Aggregation and the Gravity Equation," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 109, pages 450-455, May.
    21. Boriss Siliverstovs & Dieter Schumacher, 2009. "Estimating gravity equations: to log or not to log?," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 645-669, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkbw:31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.