IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifmmat/274.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bürokratiewahrnehmung von Unternehmen

Author

Listed:
  • Holz, Michael
  • Schlepphorst, Susanne
  • Brink, Siegrun
  • Icks, Annette
  • Welter, Friederike

Abstract

Diese Studie untersucht, wie Unternehmen Bürokratie wahrnehmen. In Abhängigkeit von der Intensität des Belastungsempfindens, des wahrgenommenen Aufwands zur Erfüllung bürokratischer Erfordernisse und der Emotionen, die Bürokratie bei Unternehmen hervorrufen, können drei Wahrnehmungstypen identifiziert werden - der Unbelastete Typ, der Pragmatische Typ und der Verdrossene Typ. Zum Verdrossenen Typ zählt mehr als jedes zweite Unternehmen in Deutschland. Ein erheblicher Anteil der Unternehmen steht dem Nutzen von bürokratischen Regeln und Vorschriften skeptisch gegenüber. Oftmals sind sie kaum in der Lage, alle bürokratischen Erfordernisse vollumfänglich umzusetzen. Ein beträchtlicher Teil baut ganz bewusst Bürokratie autonom ab. Zugleich zeigen die Unternehmen eine hohe Bereitschaft, die Politik im Prozess des Bürokratieabbaus aktiv zu unterstützen.

Suggested Citation

  • Holz, Michael & Schlepphorst, Susanne & Brink, Siegrun & Icks, Annette & Welter, Friederike, 2019. "Bürokratiewahrnehmung von Unternehmen," IfM-Materialien 274, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifmmat:274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/202423/1/1671654536.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary S. Becker, 1974. "Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach," NBER Chapters, in: Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment, pages 1-54, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Friederike Welter & David Smallbone, 2006. "Exploring the Role of Trust in Entrepreneurial Activity," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 30(4), pages 465-475, July.
    3. Icks, Annette & Wallau, Frank & Fischer-Steege, Heide & Richter, Michael & Schorn, Michael, 2006. "Ermittlung bürokratischer Kostenbelastungen in ausgewählten Bereichen: Gutachten im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Technologie," IfM-Materialien 166, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    4. Welter, Friederike & May-Strobl, Eva & Holz, Michael & Pahnke, André & Schlepphorst, Susanne & Wolter, Hans-Jürgen & Kranzusch, Peter, 2015. "Mittelstand zwischen Fakten und Gefühl," IfM-Materialien 234, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    5. Yasemin Y. Kor & Joseph T. Mahoney & Steven C. Michael, 2007. "Resources, Capabilities and Entrepreneurial Perceptions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(7), pages 1187-1212, November.
    6. John Kitching, 2006. "A Burden on Business? Reviewing the Evidence Base on Regulation and Small-Business Performance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(6), pages 799-814, December.
    7. Schlepphorst, Susanne & Schlömer-Laufen, Nadine, 2016. "Schnell wachsende Unternehmen in Deutschland: Charakteristika und Determinanten ihres Wachstums," IfM-Materialien 246, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    8. Rachel S. Shinnar & Olivier Giacomin & Frank Janssen, 2012. "Entrepreneurial Perceptions and Intentions: The Role of Gender and Culture," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(3), pages 465-493, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schneider, Sebastian & Reiff, Annika & Schlömer-Laufen, Nadine, 2023. "Mittelstandsfreundliche Gestaltung von öffentlichen Ausschreibungen," IfM-Materialien 301, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    2. Schneider, Sebastian & Schlömer-Laufen, Nadine & Reiff, Annika, 2024. "Bürokratische Belastungen von KMU im Baugewerbe im Zuge ihrer Beteiligung an öffentlichen Ausschreibungen," IfM-Materialien 307, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    3. Kranzusch, Peter & Icks, Annette & Levering, Britta & Pasing, Philipp, 2019. "Herausforderungen für den Mittelstand - Update der Unternehmersicht 2019," IfM-Materialien 279, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    4. Zarges, Lara & Garnitz, Johanna & von Maltzan, Annette & Wohlrabe, Klaus, 2023. "Der Investitionsstandort Deutschland aus Sicht der Familienunternehmen: Jahresmonitor der Stiftung Familienunternehmen," Studien, Stiftung Familienunternehmen / Foundation for Family Businesses, number 281020.
    5. Bijedić, Teita & Butkowski, Olivier K. & Kay, Rosemarie & Suprinovič, Olga, 2020. "Bestimmungsfaktoren des regionalen Gründungsgeschehens - eine Machbarkeitsstudie," IfM-Materialien 280, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    6. Welter, Friederike & Schlepphorst, Susanne & Schneck, Stefan & Holz, Michael, 2020. "Der gesellschaftliche Beitrag des Mittelstands: Konzeptionelle Überlegungen [The societal impact of German Mittelstand: Conceptual considerations]," IfM-Materialien 283, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    7. Brink, Siegrun & Levering, Britta & Icks, Annette, 2020. "Zukunftspanel Mittelstand 2020: Update der Expertenbefragung zu aktuellen und zukünftigen Herausforderungen des deutschen Mittelstands," IfM-Materialien 282, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Libman & Janis N. Kluge, 2017. "Sticks or Carrots? Comparing Effectiveness of Government Shadow Economy Policies in Russia," Working Papers 364, Leibniz Institut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung (Institute for East and Southeast European Studies).
    2. Dheer, Ratan J.S. & Li, Mingxiang & Treviño, Len J., 2019. "An integrative approach to the gender gap in entrepreneurship across nations," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1-1.
    3. Bachmann, Nina & Rose, Robert & Maul, Valeska & Hölzle, Katharina, 2024. "What makes for future entrepreneurs? The role of digital competencies for entrepreneurial intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Ratan J. S. Dheer & Tomasz Lenartowicz, 2018. "Multiculturalism and Entrepreneurial Intentions: Understanding the Mediating Role of Cognitions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(3), pages 426-466, May.
    5. Khalil, Umair, 2017. "Do more guns lead to more crime? Understanding the role of illegal firearms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 342-361.
    6. van Ours, Jan C. & Williams, Jenny & Ward, Shannon, 2015. "Bad Behavior: Delinquency, Arrest and Early School Leaving," CEPR Discussion Papers 10755, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Patrick Arni & Rafael Lalive & Jan C. Van Ours, 2013. "How Effective Are Unemployment Benefit Sanctions? Looking Beyond Unemployment Exit," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(7), pages 1153-1178, November.
    8. Dennis L. Gärtner, 2022. "Corporate Leniency in a Dynamic World: The Preemptive Push of an Uncertain Future," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(1), pages 119-146, March.
    9. Deborah A. Cobb-Clark & Chris Ryan & Ana Sartbayeva, 2009. "Taking Chances: The Effect of Growing Up on Welfare on the Risky Behaviour of Young People," CEPR Discussion Papers 604, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    10. Antonio Acconcia & Marcello D'Amato & Riccardo Martina, 2003. "Corruption and Tax Evasion with Competitive Bribes," CSEF Working Papers 112, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    11. J. K. Pappalardo, 2022. "Economics of Consumer Protection: Contributions and Challenges in Estimating Consumer Injury and Evaluating Consumer Protection Policy," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 201-238, June.
    12. M. Martin Boyer, 2007. "Resistance (to Fraud) Is Futile," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 74(2), pages 461-492, June.
    13. David Cayla, 2021. "Le « vivre-ensemble » face au projet néolibéral," Post-Print hal-02961194, HAL.
    14. Gary Bolton & Eugen Dimant & Ulrich Schmidt, 2018. "When a Nudge Backfires. Using Observation with Social and Economic Incentives to Promote Pro-Social Behavior," PPE Working Papers 0017, Philosophy, Politics and Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    15. Dwenger, Nadja & Kleven, Henrik & Rasul, Imran & Rincke, Johannes, 2014. "Extrinsic vs Intrinsic Motivations for Tax Compliance. Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment in Germany," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100389, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    16. Daron Acemoglu & Matthew O. Jackson, 2017. "Social Norms and the Enforcement of Laws," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 245-295.
    17. Hahn Robert, 2010. "Designing Smarter Regulation with Improved Benefit-Cost Analysis," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-19, July.
    18. Kerri Brick & Martine Visser & Justine Burns, 2012. "Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence from South African Fishing Communities," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 94(1), pages 133-152.
    19. Entorf, Horst & Spengler, Hannes, 2000. "Socioeconomic and demographic factors of crime in Germany: Evidence from panel data of the German states," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 75-106, March.
    20. Radha Jagannathan & Michael J. Camasso & Bagavan Das & Jale Tosun & Sadagopan Iyengar, 2017. "Family, society and the individual: determinants of entrepreneurial attitudes among youth in Chennai, South India," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bürokratie; Informationspflichten; Erfüllungsaufwand; Bürokratieabbau; bureaucracy; administrative burdens; compliance costs; reduction of red tape;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law
    • L5 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifmmat:274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmbode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.