IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iatfor/092021.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Neue Wagniskapitalformen in Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Scheuplein, Christoph

Abstract

In Deutschland haben sich neue Formen der Wagniskapitalfinanzierung entwickelt, die Gründern kurzfristige Beratungsprogramme (Acceleratoren) oder längerfristige Infrastrukturen (Inkubatoren) anbieten. Zudem werden Gründungen unternehmensintern vorgenommen (Company Builder) oder im Auftrag anderer Unternehmen (Inkubation als Service) betrieben. Es konnten 238 "Inkubationsfinanzierer" dokumentiert werden, die somit rund 17 Prozent aller in Deutschland aktiven Wagniskapitalgeber stellten. Mit je 30 Neugründungen pro Jahr wurde das stärkste Wachstum in den Jahren 2015 bis 2017 erreicht. Nachdem zunächst Akteure der Finanzwirtschaft und dann strategische Unternehmen Inkubationsfinanzierer gründeten, hat in den letzten Jahren auch der Staat derartige Geschäftsmodelle auf den Weg gebracht. Die meisten der in Deutschland ansässigen Inkubationsfinanzierer waren in Berlin (31 %), München (15 %) sowie Hamburg (8 %) beheimatet. Das Ruhrgebiet lag auf dem sechsten Platz (5 %), wobei ein Drittel der Inkubationsfinanzierer öffentlich gefördert wurden. Die Inkubationsfinanzierung schafft neue Kooperationsmöglichkeiten zwischen finanzwirtschaftlichen Akteuren, strategischen Unternehmen und staatlichen Einrichtungen und bietet somit einen Impuls für die Erneuerung des korporatistischen Innovationssystems in Deutschland.

Suggested Citation

  • Scheuplein, Christoph, 2021. "Neue Wagniskapitalformen in Deutschland," Forschung Aktuell 09/2021, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iatfor:092021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/243286/1/1773377612.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sean M. Hackett & David M. Dilts, 2004. "A Systematic Review of Business Incubation Research," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 55-82, January.
    2. Phillip H Phan & Sarfraz A Mian & Wadid Lamine (ed.), 2016. "Technology Entrepreneurship and Business Incubation:Theory, Practice, Lessons Learned," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number p1088, December.
    3. Huseyin Leblebici & Nina Shah, 2004. "The Birth, Transformation and Regeneration of Business Incubators as New Organisational Forms: Understanding the Interplay between Organisational History and Organisational Theory," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 353-380.
    4. Scheuplein, Christoph & Kahl, Julian, 2017. "Do Company Builders Create Jobs? Examining the Rise of Incubation Finance in Germany," IAT Discussion Papers 17/01, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    5. Anders Lundström & Lois A. Stevenson, 2005. "Entrepreneurship Policy: Theory and Practice," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, Springer, number 978-0-387-24202-6, November.
    6. Yael V. Hochberg, 2016. "Accelerating Entrepreneurs and Ecosystems: The Seed Accelerator Model," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(1), pages 25-51.
    7. José Barbero & José Casillas & Mike Wright & Alicia Ramos Garcia, 2014. "Do different types of incubators produce different types of innovations?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 151-168, April.
    8. Sarfraz Mian, 2016. "Business Incubation and Incubator Mechanisms," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Phillip H Phan & Sarfraz A Mian & Wadid Lamine (ed.), TECHNOLOGY ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND BUSINESS INCUBATION Theory • Practice • Lessons Learned, chapter 1, pages 1-33, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    9. Nawab Khan & Haitao Qu & Jing Qu & ChunMiao Wei & Shihao Wang, 2021. "Does Venture Capital Investment Spur Innovation? A Cross-Countries Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scheuplein, Christoph, 2017. "Company builder: Innovatives Risikokapital als Motor des Beschäftigungswachstums," Forschung Aktuell 11/2017, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    2. Manhart, Niklas, 2022. "The Mission Comes First: Exploring the Mechanisms of Organizational Sponsorship for the Acceleration of Social Start-Ups," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 7(2), pages 289-337.
    3. Christina Theodoraki & Karim Messeghem & Mark P. Rice, 2018. "A social capital approach to the development of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an explorative study," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 153-170, June.
    4. Fabrice Gilles & Yannick L'Horty & Ferhat Mihoubi, 2021. "The Effects of the Non-Financial Component of Business Accelerators," TEPP Working Paper 2021-06, TEPP.
    5. Elsie Harper-Anderson & David A. Lewis, 2018. "What Makes Business Incubation Work? Measuring the Influence of Incubator Quality and Regional Capacity on Incubator Outcomes," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 32(1), pages 60-77, February.
    6. Marijn van Weele & Frank J. Rijnsoever & Chris P. Eveleens & Henk Steinz & Niels Stijn & Menno Groen, 2018. "Start-EU-up! Lessons from international incubation practices to address the challenges faced by Western European start-ups," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1161-1189, October.
    7. J. Piet Hausberg & Sabrina Korreck, 2020. "Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 151-176, February.
    8. Tali Hadasa Blank, 2021. "When incubator resources are crucial: survival chances of student startups operating in an academic incubator," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1845-1868, December.
    9. Ernesto Tavoletti, 2013. "Business Incubators: Effective Infrastructures or Waste of Public Money? Looking for a Theoretical Framework, Guidelines and Criteria," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 4(4), pages 423-443, December.
    10. Kameliya Deyanova & Nataliia Brehmer & Artur Lapidus & Victor Tiberius & Steve Walsh, 2022. "Hatching start-ups for sustainable growth: a bibliometric review on business incubators," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(7), pages 2083-2109, October.
    11. Scheuplein, Christoph & Kahl, Julian, 2017. "Do Company Builders Create Jobs? Examining the Rise of Incubation Finance in Germany," MPRA Paper 82733, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. van Weele, Marijn & van Rijnsoever, Frank J. & Nauta, Frans, 2017. "You can't always get what you want: How entrepreneur's perceived resource needs affect the incubator's assertiveness," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 18-33.
    13. Pauwels, Charlotte & Clarysse, Bart & Wright, Mike & Van Hove, Jonas, 2016. "Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 50, pages 13-24.
    14. Sharma, Supriya & Vohra, Neharika, 2020. "Incubation in India – A Multilevel Analysis," IIMA Working Papers WP 2020-03-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    15. Brian J. Bergman & Jeffery S. McMullen, 2022. "Helping Entrepreneurs Help Themselves: A Review and Relational Research Agenda on Entrepreneurial Support Organizations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 688-728, May.
    16. Charlene L. Nicholls-Nixon & Dave Valliere & Steven A. Gedeon & Sean Wise, 2021. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the lifecycle of university business incubators: An integrative case study," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 809-837, June.
    17. Domicián Máté & Ni Made Estiyanti & Adam Novotny, 2024. "How to support innovative small firms? Bibliometric analysis and visualization of start-up incubation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Abootorabi, Hooman & Wiklund, Johan & Johnson, Alan R. & Miller, Cameron D., 2021. "A holistic approach to the evolution of an entrepreneurial ecosystem: An exploratory study of academic spin-offs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(5).
    19. Lall, Saurabh A. & Chen, Li-Wei & Roberts, Peter W., 2020. "Are we accelerating equity investment into impact-oriented ventures?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    20. Gonzalez-Uribe, Juanita & Hmaddi, Ouafaa, 2022. "The multi-dimensional impacts of business accelerators: what does the research tell us?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115461, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iatfor:092021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iatgede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.