IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/hirdps/304458.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Markt- vs. ortsbasierter Ansatz: Vorschlag zur Harmonisierung der Klimabilanzierung von Strom
[Carbon Accounting of Electricity: Managing the Gap between market- and location-based Approaches]

Author

Listed:
  • Kemper, Marina
  • Styles, Alexandra
  • Mundt, Juliane
  • Werner, Robert
  • Kreis, Philippa

Abstract

Sowohl in der täglichen Forschungs- und Projektarbeit mit unseren Kunden als auch bei unserem Mitwirken in der nationalen, europäischen und internationalen Normung (z.B. DIN, CEN-CENELEC, ISO) befassen wir uns immer wieder mit Fragestellungen rund um die Nachweisführung und Klimabilanzierung. Ein viel diskutiertes Thema ist dabei das Spannungsfeld zwischen dem markt- und dem ortsbasierten Ansatz bei der Klimabilanzierung von Strom. Deren parallele Anwendung stellt in der derzeitigen Ausgestaltung und praktischen Handhabung ein Hemmnis für die Vergleichbarkeit und in der Folge für die Glaubwürdigkeit der Klimabilanzierung insgesamt dar. Mit diesem Discussion Paper möchten wir die aktuelle Problematik näher beleuchten - vor allem aber eine Diskussion über mögliche Lösungsansätze anregen sowie ein Ausrufezeichen hinter die Notwendigkeit setzen, die Harmonisierung der bestehenden Ansätze zur Strombilanzierung in den Fokus zu rücken.

Suggested Citation

  • Kemper, Marina & Styles, Alexandra & Mundt, Juliane & Werner, Robert & Kreis, Philippa, 2024. "Markt- vs. ortsbasierter Ansatz: Vorschlag zur Harmonisierung der Klimabilanzierung von Strom [Carbon Accounting of Electricity: Managing the Gap between market- and location-based Approaches]," Hamburg Institut Discussion Papers 304458, HIR Hamburg Institut Research gGmbH.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hirdps:304458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/304458/1/1906749620.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anders Bjørn & Shannon M. Lloyd & Matthew Brander & H. Damon Matthews, 2022. "Renewable energy certificates threaten the integrity of corporate science-based targets," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(6), pages 539-546, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Angxing & Zhang, Jihong, 2024. "Technologies for CO2 emission reduction and low-carbon development in primary aluminum industry in China: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    2. Tristan Jourde & Arthur Stalla-Bourdillon, 2024. "PEnvironmental Preferences and Sector Valuations," Working papers 964, Banque de France.
    3. Hechelmann, Ron-Hendrik & Paris, Aaron & Buchenau, Nadja & Ebersold, Felix, 2023. "Decarbonisation strategies for manufacturing: A technical and economic comparison," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Juan Ignacio Iba~nez & Alexander Freier, 2023. "Don't Trust, Verify: Towards a Framework for the Greening of Bitcoin," Papers 2305.01815, arXiv.org.
    5. Maida Hadziosmanovic & Shannon M. Lloyd & Anders Bjørn & Raymond L. Paquin & Nadine Mengis & H. Damon Matthews, 2022. "Using cumulative carbon budgets and corporate carbon disclosure to inform ambitious corporate emissions targets and long‐term mitigation pathways," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1747-1759, October.
    6. Clara Privato & Matthew P. Johnson & Timo Busch, 2024. "Raising the bar: What determines the ambition level of corporate climate targets?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(9), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Zhou, Dequn & Dong, Zhuojia & Sang, Xiuzhi & Wang, Qunwei & Yu, Xianyu, 2023. "Do feed-in tariff reduction and green certificate trading effectively promote regional sustainable development？," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    8. Li, Peixian & Ng, Jeremy & Lu, Yujie, 2022. "Accelerating the adoption of renewable energy certificate: Insights from a survey of corporate renewable procurement in Singapore," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1272-1282.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hirdps:304458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hamburg-institut.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.