IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/fisisi/s062020.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sharing Economy in der Mobilität: Potenzielle Nutzung und Akzeptanz geteilter Mobilitätsdienste in urbanen Räumen in Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Krauss, Konstantin
  • Scherrer, Aline
  • Burghard, Uta
  • Schuler, Johannes
  • Burger, Axel Michael
  • Doll, Claus

Abstract

Die urbane Mobilität hat sich in den letzten Jahren stark gewandelt. Hierzu tragen vermehrt die aufkommenden Sharing-Angebote bei. Neben dem schon länger betriebenen Carsharing kam vor einigen Jahren das Bikesharing und nun auch das Ridesharing und E-Scootersharing hinzu. Die Akzeptanz dieser vier Dienste wurden in der vorliegenden Studie mittels einer Erhebung unter 3.061 Probanden in deutschen Großstädten untersucht. Ziel der Untersuchung war es, die Be-kanntheit, Einstellung wie auch Nutzungsintentionen der Personen gegenüber diesen vier Sharing-Diensten zu analysieren. Carsharing ist unter den vier Diensten mit Abstand am bekanntesten (93 % der Probanden ist der Dienst bekannt). Bikesharing folgt an zweiter Position (69% Bekanntheit). E-Scootersharing (53% Bekanntheit) und Ridesharing (47 %) sind deutlich weniger bekannt. Die Einstellungen gegenüber den vier Diensten sind überwiegend neutral, mit der Ausnahme des E-Scootersharing, das negativer bewertet wird. Nichtsdestotrotz weist das E-Scootersharing hohe Nutzungspotenziale, d. h. geäußerte Nutzungs-absichten, für verschiedene Wegezwecke (insbesondere Freizeitwege) auf. An zweiter Stelle folgt hinsichtlich der Nutzungspotenziale das Ridesharing, insbe-sondere in der gepoolten Version (teilen der Fahrt mit Anderen). Carsharing und Bikesharing weisen geringere Nutzungspotenziale auf. Die in der Studie identifizierten Early Adopter, das heißt, die Personen, die schon jetzt die neuen Mobilitätsdienste nutzen, sind überwiegend jüngere Personen mit höherem Bildungslevel. Zudem sind unter den Early Adoptern mit höherer Wahr-scheinlichkeit Männer sowie Personen, die in Vollzeit erwerbstätig sind. Im Ver-gleich zu den befragten Personen, die die Sharing-Angebote derzeit noch nicht nutzen, steht diesen Early Adoptern außerdem weniger häufig ein privates Auto zur Verfügung. Die Ergebnisse dieser Studie liefern einen Überblick über die Nutzung wie auch die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer der geteilten Mobilität in Deutschland. Weitere Ana-lysen, für welche exakten Distanzen welcher Dienst besonders geeignet ist, wel-che Kombination von Diensten wertvoll ist oder auch welche Zielgruppen das höchste Nutzungspotenzial aufweisen, sind notwendig. Wo aus Gründen der besseren Lesbarkeit nicht anders möglich, wird in diesem Bericht das generische Maskulinum verwendet. Es sind jedoch immer alle Ge-schlechteridentitäten mitgemeint, soweit es für die Aussage erforderlich ist.

Suggested Citation

  • Krauss, Konstantin & Scherrer, Aline & Burghard, Uta & Schuler, Johannes & Burger, Axel Michael & Doll, Claus, 2020. "Sharing Economy in der Mobilität: Potenzielle Nutzung und Akzeptanz geteilter Mobilitätsdienste in urbanen Räumen in Deutschland," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S06/2020, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s062020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/215685/1/1693847310.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shaheen, Susan & Cohen, Adam, 2018. "Shared ride services in North America: definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2wr9q8c2, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Vanderschuren, Marianne & Baufeldt, Jennifer, 2018. "Ride-sharing: A potential means to increase the quality and availability of motorised trips while discouraging private motor ownership in developing cities?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 607-614.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shiraki, Hiroto & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi & Shigetomi, Yosuke & Ehara, Tomoki & Ochi, Yuki & Ogawa, Yuki, 2020. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions from private automobiles in Japan: The impact of vehicle occupancy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    2. Doll, Claus & Krauss, Konstantin, 2022. "Nachhaltige Mobilität und innovative Geschäftsmodelle," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 10-2022, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    3. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Daniels, Chux & AbdulRafiu, Abbas, 2022. "Transitioning to electrified, automated and shared mobility in an African context: A comparative review of Johannesburg, Kigali, Lagos and Nairobi," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. María J. Alonso-González & Oded Cats & Niels van Oort & Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser & Serge Hoogendoorn, 2021. "What are the determinants of the willingness to share rides in pooled on-demand services?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1733-1765, August.
    5. Arias-Molinares, Daniela & Romanillos, Gustavo & García-Palomares, Juan Carlos & Gutiérrez, Javier, 2021. "Exploring the spatio-temporal dynamics of moped-style scooter sharing services in urban areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Wesley Darling & Jacquelyn Broader & Adam Cohen & Susan Shaheen, 2023. "Going My Way? Understanding Curb Management and Incentive Policies to Increase Pooling Service Use and Public Transit Linkages in the San Francisco Bay Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    7. María J. Alonso-González & Oded Cats & Niels van Oort & Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser & Serge Hoogendoorn, 0. "What are the determinants of the willingness to share rides in pooled on-demand services?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-33.
    8. Nuren Abedin & Md Mahmudur Rahman & Muhammad Ismail Hossain & Kenji Hisazumi & Ashir Ahmed, 2020. "Travel Behavior of SME Employees in Their Work Commute in Emerging Cities: A Case Study in Dhaka City, Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Jens Schippl & Annika Arnold, 2020. "Stakeholders’ Views on Multimodal Urban Mobility Futures: A Matter of Policy Interventions or Just the Logical Result of Digitalization?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Alejandro Tirachini, 2020. "Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: an international review," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2011-2047, August.
    11. Barbour, Elisa & Alvarez-Coria, Rosanely & Anderson, Hayden & Hosseinzade, Rey & Turner, Katherine & Handy, Susan, 2023. "Barriers to Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Transportation Part 3: The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Travel Patterns," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt5q0076tq, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    12. Maksymilian Mądziel & Tiziana Campisi & Artur Jaworski & Hubert Kuszewski & Paweł Woś, 2021. "Assessing Vehicle Emissions from a Multi-Lane to Turbo Roundabout Conversion Using a Microsimulation Tool," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Wang, Yineng & Lin, Xi & He, Fang & Li, Meng, 2022. "Designing transit-oriented multi-modal transportation systems considering travelers’ choices," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 292-327.
    14. Darling, Wesley & Broader, Jacquelyn & Cohen, Adam & Shaheen, Susan PhD, 2023. "Going My Way? Understanding Curb Management and Incentive Policies to Increase Pooling Service Use and Public Transit Linkages in the San Francisco Bay Area," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt73f4d4bc, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    15. Nur Oktaviani Widiastuti & Muhammad Zudhy Irawan, 2024. "Ride-Hailing Preferences for First- and Last-Mile Connectivity at Intercity Transit Hubs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Soria, Jason & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2021. "Investigating socio-spatial differences between solo ridehailing and pooled rides in diverse communities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Shi, Xiaoyang & Li, Zhengquan & Xia, Enjun, 2021. "The impact of ride-hailing and shared bikes on public transit: Moderating effect of the legitimacy," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    18. Shaheen, Susan & Darling, Wesley & Broader, Jacquelyn & Cohen, Adam, 2021. "Understanding Curb Management and Targeted Incentive Policies to Increase Transportation Network Company Pooling and Public Transit Linkages," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6gz9w0v9, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    19. Jason Soria & Shelly Etzioni & Yoram Shiftan & Amanda Stathopoulos & Eran Ben-Elia, 2022. "Microtransit adoption in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from a choice experiment with transit and car commuters," Papers 2204.01974, arXiv.org.
    20. Diep Ngoc Su & Duy Quy Nguyen-Phuoc & Lester W. Johnson, 2021. "Effects of perceived safety, involvement and perceived service quality on loyalty intention among ride-sourcing passengers," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 369-393, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s062020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isfhgde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.