IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/euvwdp/376.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Complete solution of the extended EOQ repair and waste disposal model with switching costs

Author

Listed:
  • Kozlovskaya, Nadezhda
  • Pakhomova, Nadezhda
  • Richter, Knut

Abstract

The EOQ repair and waste disposal problem was studied first by Richter, 1997. A first shop is providing a homogeneous product used by a second shop at a constant demand rate. The first shop is manufacturing new products and it is also repairing products used by a second shop, which are then regarded as being as good as new. The products are employed by a second shop and collected there according to a repair rate. The other products are immediately disposed of as waste. At the end of some period of time, the collected products are brought back to the first shop and will be stored as long as necessary and then repaired. If the repaired products are finished, the manufacturing process starts to cover the remaining demand for the time interval. The model was extended by Saadany and Jaber, 2008 to the problem of minimizing the total cost of production, remanufacturing and inventory while incorporating additional switching costs. The switching cost is incurred when the process shifts from repair to production and from production to repair. However, in their paper the authors did not provide a complete solution to this complex problem. We provide the solution in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Kozlovskaya, Nadezhda & Pakhomova, Nadezhda & Richter, Knut, 2015. "Complete solution of the extended EOQ repair and waste disposal model with switching costs," Discussion Papers 376, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Department of Business Administration and Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:euvwdp:376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/122196/1/838979564.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. El Saadany, Ahmed M.A. & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 2013. "How many times to remanufacture?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 598-604.
    2. Andriolo, Alessandro & Battini, Daria & Grubbström, Robert W. & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2014. "A century of evolution from Harris׳s basic lot size model: Survey and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 16-38.
    3. Schulz, Tobias & Voigt, Guido, 2014. "A flexibly structured lot sizing heuristic for a static remanufacturing system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 21-31.
    4. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & El Saadany, Ahmed M.A., 2009. "The production, remanufacture and waste disposal model with lost sales," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 115-124, July.
    5. Mabini, Marilyn C. & Pintelon, Liliane M. & Gelders, Ludo F., 1992. "EOQ type formulations for controlling repairable inventories," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 21-33, November.
    6. Choi, Dae-Won & Hwang, Hark & Koh, Shie-Gheun, 2007. "A generalized ordering and recovery policy for reusable items," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 764-774, October.
    7. Dobos, Imre & Richter, Knut, 2004. "An extended production/recycling model with stationary demand and return rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 311-323, August.
    8. Konstantaras, I. & Skouri, K., 2010. "Lot sizing for a single product recovery system with variable setup numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 326-335, June.
    9. Richter, Knut, 1996. "The extended EOQ repair and waste disposal model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-3), pages 443-447, August.
    10. Konstantaras, I. & Papachristos, S., 2008. "A note on: Developing an exact solution for an inventory system with product recovery," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 707-712, February.
    11. Richter, Knut & Dobos, Imre, 1999. "Analysis of the EOQ repair and waste disposal problem with integer setup numbers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 463-467, March.
    12. Richter, Knut, 1996. "The EOQ repair and waste disposal model with variable setup numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 313-324, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kozlovskaya, Nadezhda & Pakhomova, Nadezhda & Richter, Knut, 2016. "A general production and recovery EOQ model with stationary demand and return rates," Discussion Papers 378, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Department of Business Administration and Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kozlovskaya, Nadezhda & Pakhomova, Nadezhda & Richter, Knut, 2016. "A general production and recovery EOQ model with stationary demand and return rates," Discussion Papers 378, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Department of Business Administration and Economics.
    2. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Lathifah, Artya, 2022. "Ordering and waste reuse decisions in a make-to-order system under demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1290-1303.
    3. Omar, Mohd & Yeo, Ivan, 2014. "A production–repair inventory model with time-varying demand and multiple setups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 398-405.
    4. Bimal Kumar Mawandiya & J. K. Jha & Jitesh J. Thakkar, 2020. "Optimal production-inventory policy for closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing under random demand and return," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1623-1664, September.
    5. Lucas Dias Condeixa & Pierry Silva & Diego Moah & Brenda Farias & Adriana Leiras, 2022. "Evaluating cost impacts on reverse logistics using an Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model with environmental and social considerations," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(3), pages 921-940, September.
    6. Sumit Maheshwari & Amrina Kausar & Ahmad Hasan & Chandra K. Jaggi, 2023. "Sustainable inventory model for a three-layer supply chain using optimal waste management," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 216-235, March.
    7. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & El Saadany, Ahmed M.A., 2009. "The production, remanufacture and waste disposal model with lost sales," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 115-124, July.
    8. Omar, Mohd & Yeo, Ivan, 2009. "A model for a production-repair system under a time-varying demand process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 17-23, May.
    9. Adel A. Alamri, 2023. "A Sustainable Closed-Loop Supply Chains Inventory Model Considering Optimal Number of Remanufacturing Times," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    10. El Saadany, Ahmed M.A. & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2011. "A production/remanufacture model with returns' subassemblies managed differently," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 119-126, September.
    11. Konstantaras, I. & Skouri, K., 2010. "Lot sizing for a single product recovery system with variable setup numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 326-335, June.
    12. El Saadany, Ahmed M.A. & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 2013. "How many times to remanufacture?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 598-604.
    13. Mostafa Parsa & Ali Shahandeh Nookabadi & Zümbül Atan & Yaser Malekian, 2022. "An optimal inventory policy for a multi-echelon closed-loop supply chain of postconsumer recycled content products," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1887-1938, July.
    14. Meherishi, Lavanya & Narayana, Sushmita A. & Ranjani, K.S., 2021. "Integrated product and packaging decisions with secondary packaging returns and protective packaging management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 930-952.
    15. Choi, Dae-Won & Hwang, Hark & Koh, Shie-Gheun, 2007. "A generalized ordering and recovery policy for reusable items," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 764-774, October.
    16. Melis Teksan, Z. & Geunes, Joseph, 2016. "An EOQ model with price-dependent supply and demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 22-33.
    17. Ullah, Mehran & Sarkar, Biswajit, 2020. "Recovery-channel selection in a hybrid manufacturing-remanufacturing production model with RFID and product quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 360-374.
    18. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Moshtagh, Mohammad Sadegh, 2019. "A consignment stock scheme for closed loop supply chain with imperfect manufacturing processes, lost sales, and quality dependent return: Multi Levels Structure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 298-316.
    19. Tahirov, Nail & Hasanov, Parviz & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2016. "Optimization of closed-loop supply chain of multi-items with returned subassemblies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1-10.
    20. Feng, Yan & Viswanathan, S., 2011. "A new lot-sizing heuristic for manufacturing systems with product recovery," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 432-438, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:euvwdp:376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwffode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.