IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esprep/210653.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Warum sind Veränderungsprozesse schwierig? Das Phänomen der Resonanz – eine interdisziplinäre Annäherung und begriffliche Grundlagen

Author

Listed:
  • Schmidt, Annett

Abstract

In verschiedenen Studien (Moldaschl et al 2011, Kühl 2011, Pescher 2010, Orellana 2009) zu Veränderungsprozessen in Unternehmen wird deutlich, dass ca. 30 – 50 % und teilweise auch mehr der geplanten und gewünschten Ergebnisse oft aus unterschiedlichsten Gründen nicht bzw. nicht nachhaltig erreicht werden. Im Ergebnis dieser interdisziplinären Literaturanalyse zur Frage - warum sind Veränderungsprozesse schwierig?-, fällt etwas entscheidendes auf. In allen Forschungsbeiträgen aus den Bereichen der Sozialphilosophie, Psychologie, Linguistik und Soziologie (vgl. u.a. Breyer/Pfänder 2017, Herfeld-Schild 2017, Rosa 2016, Miller 2015) wird Resonanz zwar als Phänomen in Interaktionsprozessen gesehen, blieb jedoch bisher in der Analyse von Veränderungsprozessen weitgehend außen. Das Phänomen der Resonanz, verstanden als ein Mitschwingen im Sinne einer Reaktion und Widerhall, der hervorgerufen wurde, beschreibt einerseits Widerspruch und Widerstand sowie andererseits zwischen den Beteiligten übereinstimmende Sicht- und Handlungsweisen. Resonanz bildet damit einen integrativen Ansatz, der m.E. neue Aspekte zu Hindernissen in Veränderungsprozessen zu erhellen vermag.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmidt, Annett, 2016. "Warum sind Veränderungsprozesse schwierig? Das Phänomen der Resonanz – eine interdisziplinäre Annäherung und begriffliche Grundlagen," EconStor Preprints 210653, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:210653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/210653/1/WorkingPaper%2001_2016%20interdiszipl.%20Ann..pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eva Boxenbaum & Stefan Jonsson, 2017. "Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges," Post-Print hal-01488051, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharma, Amalesh & Moses, Aditya Christopher & Borah, Sourav Bikash & Adhikary, Anirban, 2020. "Investigating the impact of workforce racial diversity on the organizational corporate social responsibility performance: An institutional logics perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 138-152.
    2. Martin Stangborli Time & Frode Veggeland, 2020. "Adapting to a Global Health Challenge: Managing Antimicrobial Resistance in the Nordics," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 53-64.
    3. Negash, Minga & Lemma, Tesfaye T. & Samkin, Grant, 2019. "Factors impacting accounting research output in developing countries: An exploratory study," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 170-192.
    4. Maurizio Cavallari, 2023. "Organizational Determinants and Compliance Behavior to Shape Information Security Plan," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 12, November.
    5. Gilbert K. Amoako & Anokye M. Adam & George Tackie & Clement Lamboi Arthur, 2021. "Environmental Accountability Practices of Environmentally Sensitive Firms in Ghana: Does Institutional Isomorphism Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Mats Alvesson & Anna Jonsson, 2022. "Organizational Dischronization: On Meaning and Meaninglessness, Sensemaking and Nonsensemaking," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 724-754, May.
    7. Areneke, Geofry & Kimani, Danson, 2019. "Value relevance of multinational directorship and cross-listing on MNEs national governance disclosure practices in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Nigeria," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 285-306.
    8. Branco, Manuel Castelo & Gomes, Delfina & Martins, Adelaide, 2023. "Exploring tax-related sustainability reporting by electric utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    9. Nader Naderpajouh & David J. Yu & Daniel P. Aldrich & Igor Linkov & Juri Matinheikki, 2018. "Engineering meets institutions: an interdisciplinary approach to the management of resilience," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 306-317, September.
    10. Geofry Areneke & Abongeh A. Tunyi, 2022. "Chairperson and CEO foreignness and CG quality of emerging markets MNCs: Moderating role of international board interlocks," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3071-3092, July.
    11. Lianidou, Theano & Zhu, Di, 2023. "Corporate social purpose statements and employee perceptions about the CEO and the corporation: A large sample natural experiment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    12. Pierre Donatella & Torbjörn Tagesson, 2021. "CFO characteristics and opportunistic accounting choice in public sector organizations," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(2), pages 509-534, June.
    13. Minga Negash & Tesfaye T. Lemma, 2020. "Institutional pressures and the accounting and reporting of environmental liabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1941-1960, July.
    14. Weiss, Tim & Lounsbury, Mike & Bruton, Garry, 2024. "Survivalist Organizing in Urban Poverty Contexts," OSF Preprints 3mecq, Center for Open Science.
    15. Merendino, Alessandro & Bek, David & Timms, Jill, 2021. "How business legacy influences organising body legitimacy in the delivery of mega events: The drift to myth at Rio 2016," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 29-42.
    16. Martins, Adelaide & Gomes, Delfina & Oliveira, Lídia & Caria, Ana & Parker, Lee, 2020. "Resistance strategies through the CEO communications in the media," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Julien Kleszczowski & Nathalie Raulet‐Croset, 2022. "Evaluating social impact in practice: Constructing a response to institutional demand in a French nonprofit organization," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(2), pages 357-380, June.
    18. Muel Kaptein, 2023. "A Paradox of Ethics: Why People in Good Organizations do Bad Things," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 297-316, April.
    19. Xiangyu Chang & Yinghui Huang & Mei Li & Xin Bo & Subodha Kumar, 2021. "Efficient Detection of Environmental Violators: A Big Data Approach," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1246-1270, May.
    20. Martin Stangborli Time & Frode Veggeland, 2020. "Adapting to a Global Health Challenge: Managing Antimicrobial Resistance in the Nordics," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 384-395.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:210653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.