IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/efisdi/82017.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Folgen des wirtschaftlichen Strukturwandels für die langfristige Entwicklung der FuE-Intensität im internationalen Vergleich

Author

Listed:
  • Gehrke, Birgit
  • Schasse, Ulrich
  • Gulden, Vivien-Sophie
  • Leidmann, Mark

Abstract

Internationaler und sektoraler Strukturwandel manifestiert sich in unterschiedlichen Prozessen, die Auswirkungen auf die internationale Verteilung von FuE-Aufwendungen und Wirtschaftsleistung haben und somit langfristige Vergleiche von FuE-Intensitäten betreffen. Ziel dieser Studie war es, diesen Sachverhalt mit Hilfe alternativer Indikatoren und Methoden wie strukturbereinigten FuE-Intensitäten und einer Komponentenzerlegung zu untersuchen. Das Hauptaugenmerk wurde dabei auf die FuE-Intensität der Wirtschaft gelegt, da diese in Deutschland wie auch im OECD-Durchschnitt rund zwei Drittel der gesamtwirtschaftlichen FuE-Intensität determiniert. Der Vergleich der tatsächlichen mit den um die Wirtschaftsstruktur bereinigten FuE-Intensitäten macht deutlich, dass vor allem Südkorea, aber auch Deutschland, Japan, Finnland und Schweden eine deutlich niedrigere FuE-Intensität der Wirtschaft aufweisen würden, wenn ihre Wirtschaftsstruktur dem Durchschnitt der betrachteten 22 OECD-Länder entspräche. In all diesen Ländern haben forschungsintensive Industrien ein vergleichsweise hohes Gewicht innerhalb der wirtschaftlichen Wertschöpfung. Alle anderen Länder, insbesondere Frankreich, Belgien und Norwegen, wären beim strukturbereinigten Indikator hingegen besser positioniert. Die Zerlegung der Abweichung nationaler FuE-Intensitäten vom OECD-Länderdurchschnitt in eine Strukturkomponente zur Beschreibung intersektoraler Gewichtsunterschiede und eine Verhaltenskomponente zur Indizierung unterschiedlicher intrasektoraler FuE-Neigung zeigt, dass beide Komponenten in langer Frist teils gegenläufig wirken. Dies gilt z.B. im Fall von Deutschland, Frankreich, Belgien, Österreich, Ungarn, der Tschechischen Republik, aber auch der USA und Südkoreas. Teils sind aber auch beide Komponenten gemeinsam für eine relativ stärkere (Japan, Schweden) bzw. schwächere Position (Kanada, Italien, Spanien, Niederlande, Polen) einzelner Volkswirtschaften im Vergleich zum Länderdurchschnitt verantwortlich. [...]

Suggested Citation

  • Gehrke, Birgit & Schasse, Ulrich & Gulden, Vivien-Sophie & Leidmann, Mark, 2017. "Folgen des wirtschaftlichen Strukturwandels für die langfristige Entwicklung der FuE-Intensität im internationalen Vergleich," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 8-2017, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:efisdi:82017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/172755/1/1009371576.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2016. "Corporate R&D intensity decomposition: Theoretical, empirical and policy issues," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2016-02, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Song, Jaeyong & Asakawa, Kazuhiro & Chu, Youngeun, 2011. "What determines knowledge sourcing from host locations of overseas R&D operations?: A study of global R&D activities of Japanese multinationals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 380-390, April.
    3. Van Reenen, John, 1997. "Why has Britain had slower R&D growth?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 493-507, December.
    4. Azele Mathieu & Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, 2010. "A Note on the Drivers of R&D Intensity," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(1), pages 56-65, November.
    5. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2010. "Introduction to a special issue: New insights on EU-US comparison of corporate R&D," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 37(6), pages 391-400, July.
    6. Schasse, Ulrich & Belitz, Heike & Kladroba, Andreas & Stenke, Gero & Leidmann, Mark, 2016. "Forschung und Entwicklung in Wirtschaft und Staat," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 2-2016, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    7. Andreas Reinstaller & Fabian Unterlass, 2012. "Comparing business R&D across countries over time: a decomposition exercise using data for the EU 27," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(12), pages 1143-1148, August.
    8. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2010. "New insights on EU-US comparison of corporate R&D," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2010-01, Joint Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schiersch, Alexander & Gehrke, Birgit, 2013. "FuE-intensive Industrien und wissensintensive Dienstleistungen im internationalen Vergleich," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 7-2013, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    2. Schasse, Ulrich & Leidmann, Mark, 2017. "Forschung und Entwicklung in Staat und Wirtschaft: Kurzstudie 2017," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 2-2017, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    3. Gehrke, Birgit & Schiersch, Alexander, 2017. "Die deutsche Wissenswirtschaft im internationalen Vergleich," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 6-2017, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello & Sara Amoroso & Michele Cincera, 0. "Corporate R&D intensity decomposition: different data, different results?," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 47(4), pages 458-473.
    2. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello & Nicola Grassano, 2022. "The EU vs US corporate R&D intensity gap: investigating key sectors and firms [A primer on innovation and growth]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(1), pages 19-38.
    3. Tihana Škrinjarić, 2020. "R&D in Europe: Sector Decomposition of Sources of (in)Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Peter Voigt & Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2012. "Can Fast Growing R&D-Intensive Smes Affect the Economic Structure of the Eu Economy?: A Projection to the Year 2020," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 2(2), pages 96-128, December.
    5. Janger, Jürgen & Schubert, Torben & Andries, Petra & Rammer, Christian & Hoskens, Machteld, 2017. "The EU 2020 innovation indicator: A step forward in measuring innovation outputs and outcomes?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 30-42.
    6. Alex Coad & Antonio Vezzani, 2017. "Manufacturing the future: is the manufacturing sector a driver of R&D, exports and productivity growth?," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2017-06, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2016. "Sector dynamics and demographics of top R&D firms in the global economy," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2016-06, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Coad, Alex, 2019. "Persistent heterogeneity of R&D intensities within sectors: Evidence and policy implications," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 37-50.
    9. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello & Peter Voigt, 2010. "Proceedings of CONCORD 2010: 2nd European Conference on Corporate R&D "An Engine for Growth, a Challenge for European Policy". Academic Forum - Summary Report," JRC Research Reports JRC60863, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Peter Voigt & Pietro Moncada-Paterno-Castello, 2012. "Projection of R&D-intensive enterprises' growth to the year 2020: Implications for EU policy?," JRC Research Reports JRC69761, Joint Research Centre.
    11. Moncada-Paternò-Castello, Pietro & Ciupagea, Constantin & Smith, Keith & Tübke, Alexander & Tubbs, Mike, 2010. "Does Europe perform too little corporate R&D? A comparison of EU and non-EU corporate R&D performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 523-536, May.
    12. Szopik-Depczyńska, Katarzyna & Kędzierska-Szczepaniak, Angelika & Szczepaniak, Krzysztof & Cheba, Katarzyna & Gajda, Waldemar & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2018. "Innovation in sustainable development: an investigation of the EU context using 2030 agenda indicators," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 251-262.
    13. Peter Mayerhofer & Matthias Firgo & Stefan Schönfelder, 2015. "Vierter Bericht zur internationalen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit Wiens," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 60625, April.
    14. Werner Hölzl & Susanne Bärenthaler-Sieber & Julia Bock-Schappelwein & Klaus Friesenbichler & Agnes Kügler & Andreas Reinstaller & Peter Reschenhofer & Bernhard Dachs & Martin Risak, 2019. "Digitalisation in Austria. State of Play and Reform Needs," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61892, April.
    15. Raquel Ortega-Argilés, 2012. "The Transatlantic Productivity Gap: A Survey Of The Main Causes," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 395-419, July.
    16. Stephen Nickell & John Van Reenen, 2001. "Technological Innovation and Performance in the United Kingdom," CEP Discussion Papers dp0488, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    17. Mario Coccia, 2012. "Path-breaking innovations for lung cancer: a revolution in clinical practice," CERIS Working Paper 201201, CNR-IRCrES Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth - Torino (TO) ITALY - former Institute for Economic Research on Firms and Growth - Moncalieri (TO) ITALY.
    18. Sandro Montresor & Antonio Vezzani, 2015. "On the R&D giants’ shoulders: do FDI help to stand on them?," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 42(1), pages 33-60, March.
    19. Murat A. Yülek, 2017. "On the Middle Income Trap, the Industrialization Process and Appropriate Industrial Policy," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 325-348, September.
    20. Fabian Unterlass & Andreas Reinstaller, 2012. "Innovation at the firm level when the level of technological development of the home country differs: Evidence for 19 EU countries," EcoMod2012 4002, EcoMod.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:efisdi:82017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-fi.de/index.php?id=1&L=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.