IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/efisdi/132022.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Neue Liste FuE-intensiver Güter und Wirtschaftszweige sowie wissensintensiver Wirtschaftszweige 2021

Author

Listed:
  • Neuhäusler, Peter
  • Rammer, Christian
  • Frietsch, Rainer
  • Feidenheimer, Alexander
  • Stenke, Gero
  • Kladroba, Andreas

Abstract

Mit dieser Studie wird die Liste forschungsintensiver Industrien - die sogenannte "Hochtechnologie-Liste" - auf Basis der aktuellen Klassifikation der Wirtschaftszweige (WZ 2008) in aktualisierter Form vorgelegt. Die neue "ISI/ZEW/SV-Liste" deckt, in tief gegliederter Ebene, sowohl den Industrie- als auch den Dienstleistungssektor ab. Neben der Liste forschungsintensiver Wirtschaftszweige enthält die Studie auch eine Liste für das aktuelle internationale Warenverzeichnis für den Außenhandel (SITC Rev. 4) sowie eine Liste wissensintensiver Wirtschaftszweige, die auf Basis von Daten zum Qualifikationsniveau der Beschäftigten sowie der Art der Beschäftigung erstellt wurde. Zudem wurden weitere Indikatoren der Wissensintensität betrachtet, die verschiedene Investitionen in Wissenskapital abbilden, nämlich Humankapitalinvestitionen, Investitionen in Software und Datenbanken, in Markenwerte und Reputation, sowie in sonstiges nicht-technisches Wissen.

Suggested Citation

  • Neuhäusler, Peter & Rammer, Christian & Frietsch, Rainer & Feidenheimer, Alexander & Stenke, Gero & Kladroba, Andreas, 2022. "Neue Liste FuE-intensiver Güter und Wirtschaftszweige sowie wissensintensiver Wirtschaftszweige 2021," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 13-2022, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:efisdi:132022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/251367/1/1795370114.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sergio Petralia, 2020. "Mapping General Purpose Technologies with Patent Data," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2027, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2020.
    2. Gehrke, Birgit & Frietsch, Rainer & Neuhäusler, Peter & Rammer, Christian & Leidmann, Mark, 2013. "Neuabgrenzung forschungsintensiver Industrien und Güter: NIW/ISI/ZEW-Listen 2012," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 8-2013, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    3. Uwe Cantner & Simone Vannuccini, 2012. "A New View of General Purpose Technologies," Jena Economics Research Papers 2012-054, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    4. Petralia, Sergio, 2020. "Mapping general purpose technologies with patent data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    5. Rainer Frietsch & Ulrich Schmoch, 2010. "Transnational patents and international markets," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 82(1), pages 185-200, January.
    6. Julie Callaert & Bart Van Looy & Arnold Verbeek & Koenraad Debackere & Bart Thijs, 2006. "Traces of Prior Art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 69(1), pages 3-20, October.
    7. Rammer, Christian & Roth, Felix & Trunschke, Markus, 2020. "Measuring organisation capital at the firm level: A production function approach," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-021, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    8. Gambardella, Alfonso & Giarratana, Marco S., 2013. "General technological capabilities, product market fragmentation, and markets for technology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 315-325.
    9. Fernando Galindo-Rueda & Fabien Verger, 2016. "OECD Taxonomy of Economic Activities Based on R&D Intensity," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2016/4, OECD Publishing.
    10. Thomas Hatzichronoglou, 1997. "Revision of the High-Technology Sector and Product Classification," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 1997/2, OECD Publishing.
    11. M. Affendy, Arip & Sim Yee, Lau & Satoru, Madono, 2010. "Commodity-industry classificationproxy: A correspondence table between SITC revision 2 and ISIC revision 3," MPRA Paper 27626, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. De Monte, Enrico & Murmann, Simona, 2024. "Unternehmensdynamik in der Wissenswirtschaft in Deutschland 2022," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 2-2024, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    2. Bersch, Johannes & Murmann, Simona, 2023. "Unternehmensdynamik in der Wissenswirtschaft in Deutschland 2021: Gründungen und Schließungen von Unternehmen, Gründungsdynamik in den Bundesländern, Internationaler Vergleich, Wagniskapital-Investiti," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 3-2023, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ricardo D. Brito & Eduardo Correia de Souza & Rodrigo Moita, 2021. "R&D intensity and Vertical Differentiation," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2021_16, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
    2. Rainer Walz & Wolfgang Eichhammer, 2012. "Benchmarking green innovation," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 24(2), pages 79-101, June.
    3. Kroll, Henning & Berghäuser, Hendrik & Blind, Knut & Neuhäusler, Peter & Scheifele, Fabian & Thielmann, Axel & Wydra, Sven, 2022. "Schlüsseltechnologien," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 7-2022, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    4. Milad Abbasiharofteh & Tom Broekel & Lars Mewes, 2024. "The role of geographic distance and technological complexity in U.S. interregional co-patenting over almost two centuries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(7), pages 2003-2022, October.
    5. Igna, Ioana & Venturini, Francesco, 2023. "The determinants of AI innovation across European firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    6. Goldfarb, Avi & Taska, Bledi & Teodoridis, Florenta, 2023. "Could machine learning be a general purpose technology? A comparison of emerging technologies using data from online job postings," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    7. Yoruk, Esin & Radosevic, Slavo & Fischer, Bruno, 2023. "Technological profiles, upgrading and the dynamics of growth: Country-level patterns and trajectories across distinct stages of development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    8. Enrico Santarelli & Jacopo Staccioli & Marco Vivarelli, 2023. "Automation and related technologies: a mapping of the new knowledge base," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 779-813, April.
    9. Appio, Francesco Paolo & Martini, Antonella & Fantoni, Gualtiero, 2017. "The light and shade of knowledge recombination: Insights from a general-purpose technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 154-165.
    10. Gonzalo Bernat, 2020. "Contenido Tecnológico de las Exportaciones Argentinas: ¿contiene más I+D+i un dólar de soja que un dólar de autos?," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4312, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    11. Carolina Castaldi & Sandro Mendonca, 2021. "Regions and trademarks. Research opportunities and policy insights from leveraging trademarks in regional innovation studies," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2138, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Dec 2021.
    12. Bojovic, Neva, 2022. "Strategic framing of enabling technologies: Insights from firms digitizing smell and taste," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    13. Kerstin Hotte & Taheya Tarannum & Vilhelm Verendel & Lauren Bennett, 2022. "Measuring artificial intelligence: a systematic assessment and implications for governance," Papers 2204.10304, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    14. Hu, Zewen & Zhou, Xiji & Lin, Angela, 2023. "Evaluation and identification of potential high-value patents in the field of integrated circuits using a multidimensional patent indicators pre-screening strategy and machine learning approaches," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    15. Simon Bruhn & Johanna Deperi, 2022. "The Contribution of Digital Firms to Productivity Growth in the Manufacturing Sector: A Decomposition Approach," GREDEG Working Papers 2022-42, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    16. Bathelt, Harald & Storper, Michael, 2023. "Related variety and regional development: a critique," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120162, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Sergio Petralia, 2020. "GPTs and Growth: Evidence on the Technological Adoption of Electrical & Electronic Technologies in the 1920s," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2033, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2020.
    18. Sun, Sunny Li & Santos, Roberto S. & Qin, Lingling, 2024. "Divergent trajectories on frontier innovations: A comparison of international venture capital-invested ventures between China and the United States," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    19. Kemeny, Tom & Petralia, Sergio & Storper, Michael, 2022. "Disruptive innovation and spatial inequality," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115953, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Korzinov, Vladimir & Savin, Ivan, 2018. "General Purpose Technologies as an emergent property," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 88-104.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:efisdi:132022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-fi.de/index.php?id=1&L=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.