IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diedps/42019.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

South Africa’s changing role in global development structures: being in them but not always of them

Author

Listed:
  • Sidiropoulos, Elizabeth

Abstract

South Africa’s engagement in global development structures has evolved since 1994, when the country re-entered the international community. The historical philosophical underpinnings of the African National Congress, the governing party, aimed to reaffirm the country’s place in the Global South and African firmament after the end of apartheid. This understanding is necessary in the context of South Africa’s priorities over the past 25 years, not least in the development debates. The last two decades have seen significant attempts to develop global norms that tackle the serious developmental challenges faced by developing countries. The paper explores these initiatives and divides them into three streams – those undertaken by the United Nations, those begun by the Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD-DAC), and those that may be understood as part of club governance processes (such as the G20, the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa), and the India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum (IBSA). South Africa’s engagement in these global development structures is analysed, along with its contribution to the evolution of African agency on the issues of global development. South Africa has strongly criticised existing power relations while undertaking strategic engagements with the North, centred on the vision of an African renaissance and the New Partnership for Africa’s Development initiative. The country has consistently argued that Northern aid cannot be put on the same platform as South-South Cooperation as they have different origins. Other African states and continental institutions have also ramped up their engagement on global development and development cooperation in recent years, which the paper also explores. While South Africa has always identified Africa as a core pillar of its foreign policy, its interests have not always cohered with those of the rest of the continent. Lastly, the paper explores possible avenues that South Africa might pursue in the current polarised multilateral environment. Its biggest challenge is the tension regarding its Global South identity, which has to balance its commitment to African issues and institutional processes, and its positioning via its membership of the BRICS as an emerging power that seeks to contest the current global power configurations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sidiropoulos, Elizabeth, 2019. "South Africa’s changing role in global development structures: being in them but not always of them," IDOS Discussion Papers 4/2019, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:42019
    DOI: 10.23661/dp4.2019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/199556/1/die-dp-2019-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.23661/dp4.2019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M.-O. Baumann, 2018. "Forever North–South? The political challenges of reforming the UN development system," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 626-641, April.
    2. Abdel-Malek, Talaat, 2015. "The global partnership for effective development cooperation: origins, actions and future prospects," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 88, number 88, July.
    3. Besharati, Neissan Alessandro, 2013. "Common goals and differential commitments: the role of emerging economies in global development," IDOS Discussion Papers 26/2013, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    4. Bracho, Gerardo, 2017. "The troubled relationship of the emerging powers and the effective development cooperation agenda: history, challenges and opportunities," IDOS Discussion Papers 25/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    5. Li, Xiaoyun, 2017. "Should China join the GPEDC? The prospects for China and the Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation," IDOS Discussion Papers 17/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    6. Stephan Klingebiel, 2018. "Transnational public goods provision: the increasing role of rising powers and the case of South Africa," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 175-188, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacobus Johannes de Jongh, 2019. "Understanding the Drivers of Long-Term Youth Unemployment: Micro-Level Evidence from South Africa," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 9912297, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Chasukwa & Dan Banik, 2019. "Bypassing Government: Aid Effectiveness and Malawi’s Local Development Fund," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 103-116.
    2. Haug, Sebastian, 2021. "Mainstreaming South-South and triangular cooperation: Work in progress at the United Nations," IDOS Discussion Papers 15/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    3. Stephen Brown, 2020. "The Rise and Fall of the Aid Effectiveness Norm," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(4), pages 1230-1248, September.
    4. Fues, Thomas, 2018. "Investing in the behavioural dimensions of transnational cooperation: a personal assessment of the Managing Global Governance (MGG) Programme," IDOS Discussion Papers 12/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    5. Bracho, Gerardo, 2017. "The troubled relationship of the emerging powers and the effective development cooperation agenda: history, challenges and opportunities," IDOS Discussion Papers 25/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    6. Elena Sondermann & Cornelia Ulbert, 2021. "Transformation through ‘Meaningful’ Partnership? SDG 17 as Metagovernance Norm and Its Global Health Implementation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 152-163.
    7. Holzapfel, Sarah & Römling, Cornelia, 2020. "Monitoring in German bilateral development cooperation: A case study of agricultural, rural development and food security projects," IDOS Discussion Papers 18/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    8. Joerg Mayer, 2017. "How Could the South Respond to Secular Stagnation in the North?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 314-335, February.
    9. Reeg, Caroline, 2017. "Spatial development initiatives – potentials, challenges and policy lessons: with a specific outlook for inclusive agrocorridors in Sub-Sahara Africa," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 97, number 97, July.
    10. Loewe, Markus (Ed.) & Rippin, Nicole (Ed.), 2015. "Translating an ambitious vision into global transformation: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development," IDOS Discussion Papers 7/2015, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    11. Ali, Murad, 2018. "Monitoring and evaluation in South-South Cooperation: the case of CPEC in Pakistan," IDOS Discussion Papers 1/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    12. Laura Trajber Waisbich, 2022. "‘It Takes Two to Tango’: South–South Cooperation Measurement Politics in a Multiplex World," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(3), pages 334-345, June.
    13. Sebastian Haug & Jack Taggart, 2024. "Global Development Governance 2.0: Fractured accountabilities in a divided governance complex," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(1), pages 128-134, February.
    14. Li, Xiaoyun, 2017. "Should China join the GPEDC? The prospects for China and the Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation," IDOS Discussion Papers 17/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    15. Klingebiel, Stephan, 2017. "Rising powers and the provision of transnational public goods: conceptual considerations and features of South Africa as a case study," IDOS Discussion Papers 3/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    16. Mohammad Mizanur Rahman & Fahim Quadir, 2023. "Exploring ‘Country Ownership’: An Analysis of Development Cooperation Practices of Selected European Partners in Bangladesh," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 18(1), pages 70-89, April.
    17. Andy Sumner & Nilima Gulrajani & Myles Wickstead & Jonathan Glennie, 2020. "A Proposal for a New Universal Development Commitment," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(4), pages 478-485, September.
    18. Mitsuaki Furukawa, 2018. "Management of the international development aid system: The Case of Tanzania," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 270-284, March.
    19. Jonathan Glennie & Nilima Gulrajani & Andy Sumner & Myles Wickstead, 2019. "A proposal for a new universal development commitment," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-119, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    20. Wehrmann, Dorothea, 2018. "Incentivising and regulating multi-actor partnerships and private-sector engagement in development cooperation," IDOS Discussion Papers 21/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Aufstrebende Mächte;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:42019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.