IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diedps/172017.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Should China join the GPEDC? The prospects for China and the Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xiaoyun

Abstract

The Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation (GPEDC) is regarded as being the 21st-century epitome of a partnership within a polycentric world in the arena of international development cooperation. This discussion paper highlights the debate on the role of the GPEDC and assesses this debate by reviewing the historical process of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC)-based development cooperation (in which the GPEDC is embedded) from a non-DAC member perspective. The paper argues that the GPEDC is considered to be just another form of the DAC’s transformation. That is why the emerging powers are sceptical – they are not a part of it; hence, they are reluctant to join it, or are even inclined to reject it. However, the paper also takes the realistic approach that the GPEDC is a valuable platform for continuing the role of development cooperation for global development, in particular to spearhead reforms in the international development cooperation regime and contribute to implementing the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals. The paper suggests how different stakeholders – including the emerging ones, particularly China – can work together to make the GPEDC a genuine partnership.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xiaoyun, 2017. "Should China join the GPEDC? The prospects for China and the Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation," IDOS Discussion Papers 17/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:172017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/199507/1/die-dp-2017-17.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahn, Timo C., 2017. "Accountability for development cooperation under the 2030 Agenda," IDOS Discussion Papers 10/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Abdel-Malek, Talaat, 2015. "The global partnership for effective development cooperation: origins, actions and future prospects," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 88, number 88, July.
    3. Janus, Heiner & Klingebiel, Stephan & Mahn, Timo Casjen, 2014. "How to shape development cooperation? The global partnership and the development cooperation forum," Briefing Papers 3/2014, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    4. Camacho, Luis A. & Kreibaum, Merle, 2017. "Cash transfers, food security and resilience in fragile contexts: general evidence and the German experience," IDOS Discussion Papers 9/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    5. Mockshell, Jonathan & Kamanda, Josey Ondieki, 2017. "Beyond the agroecological and sustainable agricultural intensification debate: is blended sustainability the way forward?," IDOS Discussion Papers 16/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    6. Weigel, Moritz & Demissie, Alexander, 2017. "A new climate trilateralism? Opportunities for cooperation between the EU, China and African countries on addressing climate change," IDOS Discussion Papers 8/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sidiropoulos, Elizabeth, 2019. "South Africa’s changing role in global development structures: being in them but not always of them," IDOS Discussion Papers 4/2019, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Michael Chasukwa & Dan Banik, 2019. "Bypassing Government: Aid Effectiveness and Malawi’s Local Development Fund," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 103-116.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali, Murad, 2017. "Implementing the 2030 Agenda in Pakistan: the critical role of an enabling environment in the mobilisation of domestic and external resources," IDOS Discussion Papers 14/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Kappel, Robert & Pfeiffer, Birte & Reisen, Helmut, 2017. "Compact with Africa: fostering private long-term investment in Africa," IDOS Discussion Papers 13/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    3. Houdret, Annabelle & Harnisch, Astrid, 2017. "Decentralisation in Morocco: the current reform and its possible contribution to political liberalisation," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    4. Rauch, Theo & Brüntrup, Michael, 2021. "Approaches for supporting smallholders in the Global South: Contentious issues, experiences, syntheses," Briefing Papers 1/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    5. Domínguez, Rafael & Olivié, Iliana, 2014. "Retos para la cooperación al desarrollo en el post-2015 /Challenges for Development Cooperation in the Post-2015," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 32, pages 995-1020, Septiembr.
    6. Elena Sondermann & Cornelia Ulbert, 2021. "Transformation through ‘Meaningful’ Partnership? SDG 17 as Metagovernance Norm and Its Global Health Implementation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 152-163.
    7. Leda Stott & David F. Murphy, 2020. "An Inclusive Approach to Partnerships for the SDGs: Using a Relationship Lens to Explore the Potential for Transformational Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Béné, Christophe & Oosterveer, Peter & Lamotte, Lea & Brouwer, Inge D. & de Haan, Stef & Prager, Steve D. & Talsma, Elise F. & Khoury, Colin K., 2019. "When food systems meet sustainability – Current narratives and implications for actions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 116-130.
    9. Rauch, Theo & Brüntrup, Michael, 2020. "Ansätze der Kleinbauernförderung im Globalen Süden: Kontroversen, Erfahrungen, Synthesen," Analysen und Stellungnahmen 17/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    10. Clock, Joseph Stanislaw, 2018. "Agriculture in rural development," International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (IJAGST), SvedbergOpen, vol. 179(2), June.
    11. Ashoff, Guido, 2015. "Die Global Governance-Qualität der internationalen Aid Effectiveness Agenda: eine theoretische Analyse und Bewertung der Systemreform der internationalen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 87, number 87, July.
    12. Holzapfel, Sarah & Römling, Cornelia, 2020. "Monitoring in German bilateral development cooperation: A case study of agricultural, rural development and food security projects," IDOS Discussion Papers 18/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    13. repec:lib:000cis:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:17-29 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Joerg Mayer, 2017. "How Could the South Respond to Secular Stagnation in the North?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 314-335, February.
    15. Moritz Von Cossel & Iris Lewandowski & Berien Elbersen & Igor Staritsky & Michiel Van Eupen & Yasir Iqbal & Stefan Mantel & Danilo Scordia & Giorgio Testa & Salvatore Luciano Cosentino & Oksana Maliar, 2019. "Marginal Agricultural Land Low-Input Systems for Biomass Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-25, August.
    16. Loewe, Markus (Ed.) & Rippin, Nicole (Ed.), 2015. "Translating an ambitious vision into global transformation: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development," IDOS Discussion Papers 7/2015, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    17. Mahn, Timo C., 2017. "Accountability for development cooperation under the 2030 Agenda," IDOS Discussion Papers 10/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    18. Michael Chasukwa & Dan Banik, 2019. "Bypassing Government: Aid Effectiveness and Malawi’s Local Development Fund," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 103-116.
    19. Mohammad Mizanur Rahman & Fahim Quadir, 2023. "Exploring ‘Country Ownership’: An Analysis of Development Cooperation Practices of Selected European Partners in Bangladesh," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 18(1), pages 70-89, April.
    20. Mitsuaki Furukawa, 2018. "Management of the international development aid system: The Case of Tanzania," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 270-284, March.
    21. Horstmann, Britta & Hein, Jonas, 2017. "Aligning climate change mitigation and sustainable development under the UNFCCC: a critical assessment of the Clean Development Mechanism, the Green Climate Fund and REDD+," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 96, number 96, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:172017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.