IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diedps/212018.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Incentivising and regulating multi-actor partnerships and private-sector engagement in development cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Wehrmann, Dorothea

Abstract

The inclusion of actors from the private sector is a central challenge for multi-actor partnerships (MAPs) and multi-stakeholder platforms in development cooperation. On the one side, the heterogeneity of approaches that shape development cooperation and rather abstract, long-term agendas (such as the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development) make it difficult to incentivise the engagement of private-sector actors that typically prefer concrete and short-term activities with predictable outcomes. On the other side, the effectiveness of past development initiatives with actors from the private sector has often proven to be limited. In order to identify strategies to meet this challenge, this discussion paper investigates the case of the Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation (GPEDC), a multi-actor partnership and platform striving for better inclusion of private-sector actors in development cooperation. More generally, the paper contributes to the debates on how multi-stakeholder networks and platforms can support the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals by incentivising and regulating the collaboration of private-sector actors in MAPs. In addition, it also provides insights on the particularities of MAPs with private-sector actors in formats exemplifying so-called South-South cooperation. The latter have been widely neglected in the literature on networks and platforms so far but are important to consider, not least because of the growing significance of partners and alternative concepts from the “Global South” and the structural dynamics and changes they enhance in the field of development cooperation. In this regard, and under consideration of different conceptual perspectives, the paper examines how multi-stakeholder networks and platforms in general – and the GPEDC in particular – can provide a supporting structure that encourages the inclusion of private-sector actors and the effectiveness of sustainable development initiatives. To achieve both – to enhance the engagement of private-sector actors and the effectiveness of MAPs in development cooperation – this paper concludes that initiatives such as the GPEDC need to: strengthen the institutional oversight that they provide, support the formulation of explicit and case-specific incentivising- and regulating-strategies, give more weight to context-specific particularities of cooperation that apply, for example, in South-South cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wehrmann, Dorothea, 2018. "Incentivising and regulating multi-actor partnerships and private-sector engagement in development cooperation," IDOS Discussion Papers 21/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:212018
    DOI: 10.23661/dp21.2018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/199541/1/die-dp-2018-21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.23661/dp21.2018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abbott, Kenneth W. & Genschel, Philipp & Snidal, Duncan & Zangl, Bernhard, 2016. "Two Logics of Indirect Governance: Delegation and Orchestration," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(4), pages 719-729, October.
    2. Paulo, Sebastian, 2014. "International cooperation and development: a conceptual overview," IDOS Discussion Papers 13/2014, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    3. AfDB AfDB, . "AfDB Annual Report 2016," Annual Report, African Development Bank, number 2383.
    4. Abdel-Malek, Talaat, 2015. "The global partnership for effective development cooperation: origins, actions and future prospects," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 88, number 88, July.
    5. AfDB AfDB, . "Improving Statistics for Food Security, Sustainable Agriculture & Rural Development - An Action Plan for Africa (2011–2015) - Bulletin N°3," Global Strategy Implementation Bulletin, African Development Bank, number 368.
    6. AfDB AfDB, . "AfDB Annual Report 2015," Annual Report, African Development Bank, number 2346.
    7. Rory Horner & David Hulme, 2017. "Converging divergence? Unpacking the new geography of 21st century global development," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 102017, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wehrmann, Dorothea, 2020. "Transnational cooperation in times of rapid global changes: The Arctic Council as a success case?," IDOS Discussion Papers 12/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Gonsior, Victoria & Klingebiel, Stephan, 2019. "The development policy system under pressure: acknowledging limitations, sourcing advantages and moving towards a broader perspective," IDOS Discussion Papers 6/2019, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    3. Baydag, Rena Melis & Klingebiel, Stephan & Marschall, Paul, 2018. "Shaping the patterns of aid allocation: a comparative analysis of seven bilateral donors and the European Union," IDOS Discussion Papers 22/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fues, Thomas, 2018. "Investing in the behavioural dimensions of transnational cooperation: a personal assessment of the Managing Global Governance (MGG) Programme," IDOS Discussion Papers 12/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Emily Aparecida Ferreira Brandão & Thiago da Rocha Santos & Stephan Rist, 2020. "Connecting Public Policies for Family Farmers and Women’s Empowerment: The Case of the Brazilian Semi-Arid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Jinyang Cai & Fengxiang Ding & Yu Hong & Ruifa Hu, 2021. "An Impact Analysis of Farmer Field Schools on Hog Productivity: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Gómez, Miguel I. & Ricketts, Katie D., 2013. "Food value chain transformations in developing countries: Selected hypotheses on nutritional implications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 139-150.
    5. Oludele Akinloye Akinboade & Segun Adeyemi Adeyefa, 2018. "An Analysis of Variance of Food Security by its Main Determinants Among the Urban Poor in the City of Tshwane, South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 61-82, May.
    6. Imen Turki Abdelhedi & Sonia Zouari Zouari, 2020. "Agriculture and Food Security in North Africa: a Theoretical and Empirical Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(1), pages 193-210, March.
    7. Gersch Inka, 2018. "Producer organizations and contract farming: a comparative study of smallholders’ market strategies in South India," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 62(1), pages 14-29, March.
    8. Augustinus, Clarissa, 2020. "Catalysing global and local social change in the land sector through technical innovation by the United Nations and the Global Land Tool Network," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Edeh, Hyacinth Onuorah & Gyimah-Brempong, Kwabena, 2014. "Determinants of Change and Household Responses to Food Insecurity: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria," 88th Annual Conference, April 9-11, 2014, AgroParisTech, Paris, France 169750, Agricultural Economics Society.
    10. Philipp Pattberg, 2017. "The emergence of carbon disclosure: Exploring the role of governance entrepreneurs," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(8), pages 1437-1455, December.
    11. Jae Yeon Park & Arlette Saint Ville & Timothy Schwinghamer & Hugo Melgar-Quiñonez, 2019. "Heterogeneous factors predict food insecurity among the elderly in developed countries: insights from a multi-national analysis of 48 countries," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(3), pages 541-552, June.
    12. Suleiman, A. & Tosan, Fregene, 2011. "Analysis of Costs and Returns of Artisanal Fish Marketing in Kebbi State, Nigeria," Journal of Rural Economics and Development, University of Ibadan, Department of Agricultural Economics, vol. 20, pages 1-9, June.
    13. Joerg Mayer, 2017. "How Could the South Respond to Secular Stagnation in the North?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 314-335, February.
    14. Tendai Chigavazira & Horácio Lucas Zandamela, 2021. "Behaviour Change in Drought Response and Management: Case Study of Mudzi District, Zimbabwe," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(2), pages 294316-2943, December.
    15. Ratana Sapbamrer & Ajchamon Thammachai, 2021. "A Systematic Review of Factors Influencing Farmers’ Adoption of Organic Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, March.
    16. Sujan Chandra Paul & Md Arif Hosen & Jyotirmay Biswas & Shahadat Hossain, 2021. "Primary education and its impact on literacy rate: A division wise comparative study of Bangladesh," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 391-405, June.
    17. Philipp Genschel & Markus Jachtenfuchs, 2017. "From market integration to core state powers: the Eurozone crisis, the refugee crisis and integration theory," RSCAS Working Papers 2017/26, European University Institute.
    18. Wehrmann, Dorothea, 2020. "Transnational cooperation in times of rapid global changes: The Arctic Council as a success case?," IDOS Discussion Papers 12/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    19. Helble, Matthias & Ali, Zulfiqar & Lego, Jera, 2018. "A Comparison of Global Governance Across Sectors: Global Health, Trade, and Multilateral Development Finance," ADBI Working Papers 806, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    20. Pienaar, Louw & Traub, Lulama, 2015. "Understanding the smallholder farmer in South Africa: Towards a sustainable livelihoods classification," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212633, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agenda 2030; Governance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:212018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.