IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diedps/192020.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How the G7 reviews its work on development: A case study of internal accountability

Author

Listed:
  • Fischer, Roger A.

Abstract

The G7 practices forms of external accountability to answer for its behaviour to the outside world and internal accountability to steer the implementation of what it has decided. To follow up on its development-related commitments, it has set up a permanent framework to produce annual public reports on how G7 national administrations have worked together to implement them. Reports under this framework draw on implementation experience, although G7 Leaders never use them to make decisions on how to carry implementation forward or design new commitments. This is because the G7 process is generally discontinuous and because its accountability process is currently not targeted at channelling feedback from implementation experience back into policymaking. The learning potential inherent in internal accountability is thus not fully used. As a result, the G7 is less effective than it could be in implementing its commitments under changing circumstances. In addition, G7 commitments and methodology do not always make it easy for outside stakeholders to check the G7's words against its behaviour, even though this is important for external accountability. Consequently, this makes it harder to have a rational debate about the legitimacy of the G7. This paper suggests ways to improve the accountability practice of the G7 so that it systematically produces learning effects and thereby better supports G7 legitimacy. The G7 can achieve learning effects by underpinning every commitment with an explicit notion of "how it wants to achieve what" and making sure that this notion gets tested regularly against implementation experience. Closing this feedback loop could be a job for G7 portfolio ministers who could make decisions on further implementation, based on the experience set out in an accountability report. Better designed commitments and improved follow-up would also support G7 legitimacy because this would make it easier for external stakeholders to verify G7 actions against its words.

Suggested Citation

  • Fischer, Roger A., 2020. "How the G7 reviews its work on development: A case study of internal accountability," IDOS Discussion Papers 19/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:192020
    DOI: 10.23661/dp19.2020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/224968/1/1733912460.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.23661/dp19.2020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger A. Fischer, 2018. "Towards Sustainable Global Value Chains: The Role of the Group of Seven," Management for Professionals, in: Sarah Margaretha Jastram & Anna-Maria Schneider (ed.), Sustainable Fashion, pages 25-39, Springer.
    2. Schmidt, Klaus M., 2017. "Contributions of Oliver Hart and Bengt Holmström to Contract Theory," Munich Reprints in Economics 49921, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    3. Müngersdorff, Maximilian & Stoffel, Tim, 2020. "Strategies to strengthen socially responsible public procurement practices in German municipalities: A mapping exercise," IDOS Discussion Papers 8/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    4. Klaus M. Schmidt, 2017. "Contributions of Oliver Hart and Bengt Holmström to Contract Theory," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 119(3), pages 489-511, July.
    5. Stoffel, Tim, 2020. "Socially responsible public procurement (SRPP) in multi-level regulatory frameworks: Assessment report on policy space for SRPP regulation and implementation in Germany and Kenya," IDOS Discussion Papers 9/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. von Haldenwang, Christian, 2020. "Digitalising the fiscal contract: An interdisciplinary framework for empirical inquiry," IDOS Discussion Papers 20/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ole Jonny Klakegg & Julien Pollack & Lynn Crawford, 2020. "Preparing for Successful Collaborative Contracts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Holzapfel, Sarah & Römling, Cornelia, 2020. "Monitoring in German bilateral development cooperation: A case study of agricultural, rural development and food security projects," IDOS Discussion Papers 18/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    3. Alexander Teytelboym & Shengwu Li & Scott Duke Kominers & Mohammad Akbarpour & Piotr Dworczak, 2021. "Discovering Auctions: Contributions of Paul Milgrom and Robert Wilson," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 123(3), pages 709-750, July.
    4. von Haldenwang, Christian, 2020. "Digitalising the fiscal contract: An interdisciplinary framework for empirical inquiry," IDOS Discussion Papers 20/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    5. Eppler, Mirko & Gaetani, Stella & Köllner, Francy & Kuhnt, Jana & Martin-Shields, Charles & Mebrahtu, Nyat & Peters, Antonia & Preiß, Carlotta, 2020. "Information and communication technology in the lives of forcibly displaced persons in Kenya," IDOS Discussion Papers 15/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    6. Gale Raj‐Reichert & Cornelia Staritz & Leonhard Plank, 2022. "Conceptualizing the Regulator‐Buyer State in the European Union for the Exercise of Socially Responsible Public Procurement in Global Production Networks," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 759-782, May.
    7. Raj‐Reichert, Gale & Staritz, Cornelia & Plank, Leonhard, 2022. "Conceptualizing the Regulator‐Buyer State in the European Union for the Exercise of Socially Responsible Public Procurement in Global Production Networks," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 60(3), pages 759-782.
    8. Stoffel, Tim, 2020. "Socially responsible public procurement (SRPP) in multi-level regulatory frameworks: Assessment report on policy space for SRPP regulation and implementation in Germany and Kenya," IDOS Discussion Papers 9/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    G7; accountability; legitimacy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:192020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.