IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/csledp/200304.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ökonomische Analyse des Rechts

Author

Listed:
  • Kirstein, Roland
  • Schmidtchen, Dieter

Abstract

Ökonomische Analyse des Rechts (ÖAR) beschäftigt sich mit den Wirkungen von Rechtsnormen, gerichtlichen Entscheidungen und Verwaltungsakten in der Lebenswirklichkeit. Sie bewertet diese Folgen mit Hilfe des Kriteriums der ökonomischen Effizienz und macht Vorschläge, wie Recht zu gestalten ist, damit ökonomisch effiziente Ergebnisse erzielt werden. Zum Forschungsgegenstand der ÖAR zählen alle Gebiete des Privatrechts, des öffentlichen Rechts und des Strafrechts sowie die jeweiligen Verfahrensrechte. In diesem Beitrag werden die vier Forschungsstränge der modernen ÖAR nachgezeichnet: * Das Coase-Theorem, einer der Hauptsätze der ÖAR, wird in Abschnitt 3.1.1 behandelt. * Die möglichen Verfahren, Risiken effizient zu verteilen und Verfügungsrechte zu schützen, sind Gegenstand von Abschnitt 3.1.2. * Die Theorie der Verfügungsrechte wird im Abschnitt 1.1.5 als Teil der grundlegenden Konzepte (Unterkapitel 1.1) diskutiert. * Je ein ganzes Unterkapitel sind der Ökonomik der Kriminalität (4.1) und des Zivilprozesses (4.2) gewidmet. Diese Liste kann als Lesehinweis für diejenigen dienen, die nicht den ganzen Beitrag durcharbeiten wollen. Auf jeden Fall sollte man sich aber mit den grundlegenden Methoden der ökonomischen Analyse des Rechts vertraut gemacht haben (Kapitel 1).

Suggested Citation

  • Kirstein, Roland & Schmidtchen, Dieter, 2003. "Ökonomische Analyse des Rechts," CSLE Discussion Paper Series 2003-04, Saarland University, CSLE - Center for the Study of Law and Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:csledp:200304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/23035/1/2003-04_oear.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary S. Becker, 1974. "Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach," NBER Chapters, in: Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment, pages 1-54, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Schmidtchen, Dieter & Koboldt, Christian & Kirstein, Roland, 1997. "Rechtsvereinheitlichung beim "droit de suite"? Ökonomische Analyse des Richtlinienentwurfs der Europäischen Kommission," CSLE Discussion Paper Series 97-02, Saarland University, CSLE - Center for the Study of Law and Economics.
    3. Schmidtchen, Dieter & Kirstein, Roland, 2001. "Die EU-Richtlinie zum Folgerecht. Eine ökonomische Gesetzesfolgenanalyse," CSLE Discussion Paper Series 2001-05, Saarland University, CSLE - Center for the Study of Law and Economics.
    4. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teodor Sedlarski & Mina Bazoteva, 2012. "Application of the Economic Analysis of Law to the Regulation of the Drug Retail Market in Bulgaria," Yearbook of the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski - Bulgaria, vol. 10(1), pages 153-175, March.
    2. Roland Kirstein, 2007. "Internationaler Müllhandel aus Sicht der ökonomischen Analyse des Rechts," FEMM Working Papers 07021, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    3. Kirstein, Roland, 2004. "Ökonomik der Kriminalität," CSLE Discussion Paper Series 2004-06, Saarland University, CSLE - Center for the Study of Law and Economics.
    4. Follert, Florian, 2019. "Zur Bestrafung bei Wirtschafts- und Steuerkriminalität: Eine ökonomische Analyse," Working Papers of the European Institute for Socioeconomics 29, European Institute for Socioeconomics (EIS), Saarbrücken.
    5. Franziska Rischkowsky & Thomas Döring, 2008. "Consumer Policy in a Market Economy Considerations from the Perspective of the Economics of Information, the New Institutional Economics as well as Behavioural Economics," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 285-313, September.
    6. Egbert, Henrik, 2010. "Die Gesetzesreform zur Entwicklung des wissenschaftlichen Personals in Bulgarien: Eine ökonomische Gesetzesfolgenabschätzung [The Reform of the Higher Education Law on the Development of Academic S," MPRA Paper 55596, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Jul 2010.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirstein, Roland, 2004. "Ökonomik der Kriminalität," CSLE Discussion Paper Series 2004-06, Saarland University, CSLE - Center for the Study of Law and Economics.
    2. Steven Shavell, 2003. "Economic Analysis of Accident Law," NBER Working Papers 9483, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Beck, Thorsten & Demirguc-Kunt, Asli & Levine, Ross, 2006. "Bank supervision and corruption in lending," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 2131-2163, November.
    4. Li, Xi, 2014. "The Sarbanes–Oxley act and cross-listed foreign private issuers," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 21-40.
    5. Jean-Baptiste Fleury & Alain Marciano, 2022. "Methodological Individualism and the Foundations of the "Law and Economics" movement," Post-Print hal-03820441, HAL.
    6. Hotte, Louis & McFerrin, Randy & Wills, Douglas, 2013. "On the dual nature of weak property rights," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 659-678.
    7. Martin Gelter & Kristoffel Grechenig, 2014. "History of Law and Economics," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2014_05, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    8. Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez‐De‐Silanes & Andrei Shleifer, 2006. "What Works in Securities Laws?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 61(1), pages 1-32, February.
    9. Joshua Schwartzstein & Andrei Shleifer, 2013. "An Activity-Generating Theory of Regulation," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(1), pages 1-38.
    10. Martin Larsson, 2017. "EU Emissions Trading: Policy-Induced Innovation, or Business as Usual? Findings from Company Case Studies in the Republic of Croatia," Working Papers 1705, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
    11. Mark Koyama, 2014. "The law & economics of private prosecutions in industrial revolution England," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 277-298, April.
    12. Gérard Mondello, 2012. "The Equivalence of Strict Liability and Negligence Rule: A " Trompe l'œil " Perspective," Post-Print hal-00727223, HAL.
    13. Gérard Mondello, 2013. "Ambiguous Beliefs on Damages and Civil Liability Theories"," Post-Print halshs-00929948, HAL.
    14. Cropper, Maureen L & Oates, Wallace E, 1992. "Environmental Economics: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(2), pages 675-740, June.
    15. Arnason, Ragnar, 2009. "Fisheries management and operations research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(3), pages 741-751, March.
    16. Philipp Denter & Dana Sisak, 2010. ""Who's the thief?": Asymmetric Information and the Creation of Property Rights," University of St. Gallen Department of Economics working paper series 2010 2010-27, Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen.
    17. Lucas, David S. & Fuller, Caleb S. & Piano, Ennio E., 2018. "Rooking the state," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 12-20.
    18. Edward P. Lazear, 2000. "Economic Imperialism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 115(1), pages 99-146.
    19. John Hamilton & Simon Deakin, 2015. "Russia's Legal Transitions: Marxist Theory, Neoclassical Economics and the Rule of Law," Working Papers wp471, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    20. Mertzanis, Charilaos, 2020. "Financial supervision structure, decentralized decision-making and financing constraints," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 13-37.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Property Rights; public law; criminal law; legal procedure;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)
    • B00 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - General - - - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches
    • A2 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics

    Lists

    This item is featured on the following reading lists, Wikipedia, or ReplicationWiki pages:
    1. Ökonomische Analyse des Rechts in Wikipedia German

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:csledp:200304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fosaade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.