An ordinal solution to bargaining problems with many players
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Note: Type of Document - ; pages: 12 . A PowerPoint presentation of the paper is available at http://www.tau.ac.il/~samet/safra-samet-1.pps
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Safra, Zvi & Samet, Dov, 2004. "An ordinal solution to bargaining problems with many players," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 129-142, January.
References listed on IDEAS
- ,, 2001. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(6), pages 1157-1160, December.
- Kalai, Ehud & Smorodinsky, Meir, 1975. "Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 43(3), pages 513-518, May.
- Kalai, Ehud, 1977.
"Proportional Solutions to Bargaining Situations: Interpersonal Utility Comparisons,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 45(7), pages 1623-1630, October.
- Ehud Kalai, 1977. "Proportional Solutions to Bargaining Situations: Interpersonal Utility Comparisons," Discussion Papers 179, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
- Nash, John, 1950. "The Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), pages 155-162, April.
- Sprumont, Yves, 2000.
"A note on ordinally equivalent Pareto surfaces,"
Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 27-38, August.
- SPRUMONT, Yves, 1997. "A Note on Ordinally Equivalent Pareto Surfaces," Cahiers de recherche 9702, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
- Thomson, William, 1994.
"Cooperative models of bargaining,"
Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, in: R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 35, pages 1237-1284,
Elsevier.
- Thomson, W., 1989. "Cooperative Models Of Bargaining," RCER Working Papers 177, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
- O'Neill, Barry & Samet, Dov & Wiener, Zvi & Winter, Eyal, 2004.
"Bargaining with an agenda,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 139-153, July.
- Barry O'Neill & Dov Samet & Zvi Wiener & Eyal Winter, 2001. "Bargaining with an Agenda," Game Theory and Information 0110004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Barry O'Neill & Dov Samet & Zvi Wiener & Eyal Winter, 2002. "Bargaining with an Agenda," Discussion Paper Series dp315, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
- ,, 2001. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(5), pages 1025-1031, October.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- O'Neill, Barry & Samet, Dov & Wiener, Zvi & Winter, Eyal, 2004.
"Bargaining with an agenda,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 139-153, July.
- Barry O'Neill & Dov Samet & Zvi Wiener & Eyal Winter, 2001. "Bargaining with an Agenda," Game Theory and Information 0110004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Barry O'Neill & Dov Samet & Zvi Wiener & Eyal Winter, 2002. "Bargaining with an Agenda," Discussion Paper Series dp315, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
- Jozsef Sakovics, 2004.
"A meaningful two-person bargaining solution based on ordinal preferences,"
Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(26), pages 1-6.
- Jozsef Sakovics, 2004. "A Meaningful Two-Person Bargaining Solution Based on Ordinal Preferences," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 98, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
- Eric van Damme & Xu Lang, 2022. "Two-Person Bargaining when the Disagreement Point is Private Information," Papers 2211.06830, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
- Perez-Castrillo, David & Wettstein, David, 2006.
"An ordinal Shapley value for economic environments,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 296-308, March.
- David Pérez-Castrillo & David Wettstein, 2003. "An Ordinal Shapley Value for Economic Environments," Working Papers 26, Barcelona School of Economics.
- David Pérez-Castrillo & David Wettstein, 2003. "An Ordinal Shapley Value for Economic Environments," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 560.03, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
- Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2015. "A non-cooperative approach to the ordinal Shapley–Shubik rule," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 111-118.
- David Perez-Castrillo & David Wettstein, 2004.
"An Ordinal Shapley Value for Economic Environments (Revised Version),"
UFAE and IAE Working Papers
634.04, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
- David Perez-Castrillo & David Wettstein, 2005. "An Ordinal Shapley Value for Economic Environments (Revised Version)," Working Papers 0502, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
- Geoffroy de Clippel, 2009. "Axiomatic Bargaining on Economic Enviornments with Lott," Working Papers 2009-5, Brown University, Department of Economics.
- Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2013. "A non-cooperative approach to the ordinal Shapley rule," MPRA Paper 43790, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Samet, Dov & Safra, Zvi, 2005. "A family of ordinal solutions to bargaining problems with many players," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 89-106, January.
- Alon, Shiri & Lehrer, Ehud, 2019. "Competitive equilibrium as a bargaining solution: An axiomatic approach," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 60-71.
- Calvo, Emilio & Peters, Hans, 2005. "Bargaining with ordinal and cardinal players," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 20-33, July.
- Özgür Kıbrıs, 2012. "Nash bargaining in ordinal environments," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 16(4), pages 269-282, December.
- repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2004:i:26:p:1-6 is not listed on IDEAS
- John Conley & Simon Wilkie, 2012. "The ordinal egalitarian bargaining solution for finite choice sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(1), pages 23-42, January.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Calvo, Emilio & Peters, Hans, 2005. "Bargaining with ordinal and cardinal players," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 20-33, July.
- Julian J. Arevalo, 2005. "Gradual Nash Bargaining with Endogenous Agenda: A Path-Dependent Model," Game Theory and Information 0502004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Boragan Aruoba, S. & Rocheteau, Guillaume & Waller, Christopher, 2007.
"Bargaining and the value of money,"
Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 2636-2655, November.
- Guillaume Rocheteau & Christopher J. Waller, 2005. "Bargaining and the value of money," Working Papers (Old Series) 0501, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
- Kibris, Ozgur, 2004. "Egalitarianism in ordinal bargaining: the Shapley-Shubik rule," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 157-170, October.
- Julián Arévalo, 2004. "Negociación Nash Gradual con Agenda Endógena: Un Modelo Trayectoria-Dependiente," Game Theory and Information 0407001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Wulf Gaertner & Richard Bradley & Yongsheng Xu & Lars Schwettmann, 2019. "Against the proportionality principle: Experimental findings on bargaining over losses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, July.
- José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & António Osório & Josep E. Peris, 2015.
"From Bargaining Solutions to Claims Rules: A Proportional Approach,"
Games, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-7, March.
- Giménez-Gómez, José-Manuel & Osorio, Antonio & Peris, Josep Enric, 2013. "From Bargaining Solutions to Claims Rules: A Proportional Approach," QM&ET Working Papers 13-2, University of Alicante, D. Quantitative Methods and Economic Theory.
- Giménez-Gómez, José Manuel & Osório Costa, Antonio Miguel & Peris, Josep E., 2013. "From bargaining solutions to claims rules: a proportional approach," Working Papers 2072/212193, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
- l'Haridon, Olivier & Malherbet, Franck & Pérez-Duarte, Sébastien, 2013.
"Does bargaining matter in the small firms matching model?,"
Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 42-58.
- L'Haridon, Olivier & Malherbet, Franck & Pérez-Duarte, Sébastien, 2010. "Does bargaining matter in the small firm's matching Mmodel?," HEC Research Papers Series 938, HEC Paris.
- Olivier LHARIDON & Franck MALHERBET & Sébastien PEREZ-DUARTE, 2011. "Does Bargaining Matter in the Small Firm’s Matching Model?," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 201116, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
- l’Haridon, Olivier & Malherbet, Franck & Pérez-Duarte, Sébastien, 2011. "Does bargaining matter in the small firm's matching model?," Working Paper Series 1359, European Central Bank.
- Olivier L’haridon & Franck Malherbet & Sébastien Pérez-Duarte, 2013. "Does bargaining matter in the small firms matching model?," Post-Print halshs-00801343, HAL.
- L'Haridon, Olivier & Malherbet, Franck & Pérez-Duarte, Sébastien, 2010. "Does Bargaining Matter in the Small Firm Matching Model?," IZA Discussion Papers 5181, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Olivier L'Haridon & Franck Malherbet & Sébastien Pérez-Duarte, 2010. "Does Bargaining Matter in the Small Firm's Matching Model?," Working Papers hal-00540792, HAL.
- Forgo, F. & Szidarovszky, F., 2003. "On the relation between the Nash bargaining solution and the weighting method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 108-116, May.
- Lombardi, Michele & Yoshihara, Naoki, 2010.
"Alternative characterizations of the proportional solution for nonconvex bargaining problems with claims,"
Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 229-232, August.
- Lombardi, Michele & Yoshihara, Naoki & 吉原, 直毅 & ヨシハラ, ナオキ, 2008. "Alternative Characterizations of the Proportional Solution for Nonconvex Bargaining Problems with Claims," Discussion Paper Series a501, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
- Michele Lombardi & Naoki Yoshihara, 2008. "Alternative Characterizations of the Proportional Solution for Nonconvex Bargaining Problems with Claims," Working Papers 632, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
- Joan Esteban & József Sákovics, 2002.
"Endogenous bargaining power,"
Economics Working Papers
644, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
- Joan Esteban & József Sákovics, 2003. "Endogenous bargaining power," Working Papers 13, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Jaume García-Segarra & Miguel Ginés-Vilar, 2019. "Stagnation proofness in n-agent bargaining problems," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 14(1), pages 215-224, March.
- S. Nuray Akin & Murat R. Sertel, 2007. "The Kalai-Smorodinsky Bargaining Solution Manipulated by Pre-Donations is Concessionary," Working Papers 0718, University of Miami, Department of Economics.
- Dietzenbacher, Bas & Estevez Fernandez, M.A. & Borm, Peter & Hendrickx, Ruud, 2016. "Proportionality, Equality, and Duality in Bankruptcy Problems with Nontransferable Utility," Other publications TiSEM 959bd6d8-7c49-4479-9fd3-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- B. Dietzenbacher & A. Estévez-Fernández & P. Borm & R. Hendrickx, 2021.
"Proportionality, equality, and duality in bankruptcy problems with nontransferable utility,"
Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 301(1), pages 65-80, June.
- Dietzenbacher, Bas & Estevez Fernandez, M.A. & Borm, Peter & Hendrickx, Ruud, 2016. "Proportionality, Equality, and Duality in Bankruptcy Problems with Nontransferable Utility," Other publications TiSEM 959bd6d8-7c49-4479-9fd3-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Dietzenbacher, Bas & Estevez Fernandez, M.A. & Borm, Peter & Hendrickx, Ruud, 2016. "Proportionality, Equality, and Duality in Bankruptcy Problems with Nontransferable Utility," Discussion Paper 2016-026, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
- Rachmilevitch, Shiran, 2013. "Cooperative bargaining: Independence and monotonicity imply disagreement," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 240-242.
- O'Neill, Barry & Samet, Dov & Wiener, Zvi & Winter, Eyal, 2004.
"Bargaining with an agenda,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 139-153, July.
- Barry O'Neill & Dov Samet & Zvi Wiener & Eyal Winter, 2001. "Bargaining with an Agenda," Game Theory and Information 0110004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Barry O'Neill & Dov Samet & Zvi Wiener & Eyal Winter, 2002. "Bargaining with an Agenda," Discussion Paper Series dp315, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
- Philip Grech & Oriol Tejada, 2018. "Divide the dollar and conquer more: sequential bargaining and risk aversion," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 47(4), pages 1261-1286, November.
- Hu, Tai-Wei & Rocheteau, Guillaume, 2020. "Bargaining under liquidity constraints: Unified strategic foundations of the Nash and Kalai solutions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
- Ok, Efe A., 1998.
"Inequality averse collective choice,"
Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 301-321, October.
- Ok, E.A., 1996. "Inequality Averse Collective Choice," Working Papers 96-36, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
More about this item
Keywords
Bargaining problems; Ordinal utility; Bargaining solutions;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- C70 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - General
- C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games
- C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-GTH-2003-10-12 (Game Theory)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpga:0310002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: EconWPA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.