IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wus045/45680654.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Investigating social inequality of urban green spacedistribution using Sentinel-2: the case of Vienna

Author

Listed:
  • Wimmer, Lorenz
  • Maus, Victor
  • Luckeneder, Sebastian

Abstract

Urban green space (UGS) is known to provide several benefits for the local population, including regulating local climate and improving human health. The inequality hypothesis claims that these environmental amenities are unequally distributed across space and among different social groups. We propose using a continuous vegetation index derived from satellite imagery to investigate environmental inequality (EI) in UGS distribution. We used spatial autoregressive models to describe the relationship between the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and socioeconomic variables in a case study on the city of Vienna at an unprecedented level of detail (250 m resolution). We show statistically significant evidence for the existence of EI in Vienna. Neighborhoods with a higher share of foreigners have significantly less UGS. Results are robust across spatial aggregation levels and alternative spatial and non-spatial model specifications. We find that our model outperforms alternative ground measure for UGS, as NDVI does not cluster around extreme values. We demonstrate the potential of satellite imagery to investigate complex social problems related to EI in urban areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Wimmer, Lorenz & Maus, Victor & Luckeneder, Sebastian, 2023. "Investigating social inequality of urban green spacedistribution using Sentinel-2: the case of Vienna," Ecological Economic Papers 46/2023, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wus045:45680654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://research.wu.ac.at/en/publications/d7d6e6d9-2e14-4448-999a-2963c725e6f7
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anselin, Luc & Bera, Anil K. & Florax, Raymond & Yoon, Mann J., 1996. "Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 77-104, February.
    2. Kirsten Schwarz & Michail Fragkias & Christopher G Boone & Weiqi Zhou & Melissa McHale & J Morgan Grove & Jarlath O’Neil-Dunne & Joseph P McFadden & Geoffrey L Buckley & Dan Childers & Laura Ogden & S, 2015. "Trees Grow on Money: Urban Tree Canopy Cover and Environmental Justice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Auspurg, Katrin & Hinz, Thomas & Schmid, Laura, 2017. "Contexts and conditions of ethnic discrimination: Evidence from a field experiment in a German housing market," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 26-36.
    4. Roger S. Bivand & David W. S. Wong, 2018. "Comparing implementations of global and local indicators of spatial association," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(3), pages 716-748, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tibor Sipos & Anteneh Afework Mekonnen & Zsombor Szabó, 2021. "Spatial Econometric Analysis of Road Traffic Crashes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Morton, Craig & Ali, Yasir, 2025. "The impact of congestion charging on car ownership: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 181-191.
    3. Zhao, Nan & Liu, Xiaojie & Pan, Changfeng & Wang, Chenyang, 2021. "The performance of green innovation: From an efficiency perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Adjin, K. Christophe & Henning, Christian H. C. A., 2019. "Farmers organizations and food availability in Senegal: An impact analysis using a spatial econometrics approach," Working Papers of Agricultural Policy WP2019-07, University of Kiel, Department of Agricultural Economics, Chair of Agricultural Policy.
    5. Evan Elderbrock & Kory Russel & Yekang Ko & Elizabeth Budd & Lilah Gonen & Chris Enright, 2024. "Evaluating Urban Green Space Inequity to Promote Distributional Justice in Portland, Oregon," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, May.
    6. Ruaa Al Juboori & Divya S. Subramaniam & Leslie Hinyard & J. S. Onésimo Sandoval, 2023. "Unveiling Spatial Associations between COVID-19 Severe Health Index, Racial/Ethnic Composition, and Community Factors in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(17), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Junming Li & Meijun Jin & Honglin Li, 2019. "Exploring Spatial Influence of Remotely Sensed PM 2.5 Concentration Using a Developed Deep Convolutional Neural Network Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-11, February.
    8. Wen-Yong Guo & Josep M. Serra-Diaz & Wolf L. Eiserhardt & Brian S. Maitner & Cory Merow & Cyrille Violle & Matthew J. Pound & Miao Sun & Ferry Slik & Anne Blach-Overgaard & Brian J. Enquist & Jens-Chr, 2023. "Climate change and land use threaten global hotspots of phylogenetic endemism for trees," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Kristien Werck & Bruno Heyndels & Benny Geys, 2008. "The impact of ‘central places’ on spatial spending patterns: evidence from Flemish local government cultural expenditures," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 32(1), pages 35-58, March.
    10. Raffaele Grotti & Helen Russell & Bertrand Maître & Davide Gritti, 2024. "The Experience of Housing Discrimination and Housing Deprivation Across Social Groups in Ireland," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 195-215, October.
    11. Juergen Deppner & Marcelo Cajias, 2024. "Accounting for Spatial Autocorrelation in Algorithm-Driven Hedonic Models: A Spatial Cross-Validation Approach," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 235-273, February.
    12. Zheng, Xinye & Li, Fanghua & Song, Shunfeng & Yu, Yihua, 2013. "Central government's infrastructure investment across Chinese regions: A dynamic spatial panel data approach," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 264-276.
    13. Yuping Deng & Helian Xu, 2015. "International Direct Investment and Transboundary Pollution: An Empirical Analysis of Complex Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-25, April.
    14. Eveline Van Leeuwen & Sandy Dall'erba, 2000. "Does Agricultural Employment Benefit From EU Support?," Regional and Urban Modeling 283600099, EcoMod.
    15. Tapsuwan, Sorada & Polyakov, Maksym & Bark, Rosalind & Nolan, Martin, 2015. "Valuing the Barmah–Millewa Forest and in stream river flows: A spatial heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent (SHAC) approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 98-105.
    16. Matt Ruther & Rebbeca Tesfai & Janice Madden, 2018. "Foreign-born population concentration and neighbourhood growth and development within US metropolitan areas," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(4), pages 826-843, March.
    17. Revelli, Federico & Tovmo, Per, 2007. "Revealed yardstick competition: Local government efficiency patterns in Norway," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 121-134, July.
    18. Begüm Yurteri Kösedağlı & A. Özlem Önder, 2021. "Determinants of financial stress in emerging market economies: Are spatial effects important?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4653-4669, July.
    19. Baylis, Kathy & Ham, Andres, 2015. "How important is spatial correlation in randomized controlled trials?," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205586, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Mohanty, Biswajit & Bhanumurthy, N. R. & Dastidar, Ananya Ghosh, 2017. "What explains Regional Imbalances in Infrastructure?: Evidence from Indian States," Working Papers 17/197, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Remote Sensing; Foreigners; NDVI; Environmental Inequality; Spatial Regression; Socioeconomics;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wus045:45680654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: WU Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://research.wu.ac.at/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.