IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wii/istudy/2001_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Development and Prospects of the Leather and Leather Products Sector in the Central and Eastern European Countries

Author

Listed:

Abstract

Access to wiiw Industrial Database In Central and Eastern Europe, as in most other economies, the leather and leather products sector is a small part of manufacturing, shaped by globalization and easy relocation of production. It is considered a labour-intensive, low-skill and low-technology industry, producing basic necessity goods (shoes) but also luxury items (leather handbags, luggage etc.). In Central Europe, the sector was neglected during the former command economy and also faced hard times during transition. The study investigates the development and prospects of the leather and leather products sector in the following countries Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia. In size, the leather and leather products sector is the smallest segment of manufacturing in most CEECs today and contributes between 0.7% to manufacturing output in the Czech Republic and about 1.7% in Romania. Specialization on the sector continued in Slovenia and started later in Bulgaria and Romania. As is typical for all CEECs and all sectors of manufacturing, wages, productivity and unit labour costs (exception Slovenia) in the leather and leather products sector have generally been much lower than in West European countries, for which we use Austria as a point of reference. During transition, sectoral wages rose in all CEECs while productivity increased only in Hungary, Poland and Romania. Hence, unit labour costs remained constant only in these three countries and rose in the others. Nevertheless, the estimated unit labour costs remain at a much lower level than in Austria (except in Slovenia). On the EU market, in 1989, CEEC leather and leather products exports had a market share of about 4%, which increased to 12% in 1998 (all shares without intra-EU trade). This share lay somewhat above total manufacturing market shares (3% in 1989 and 8% in 1998). On the Austrian market, CEEC exports had a decisively larger share, accounting for 26% of Austria's non-EU imports of leather products in 1995, increasing to 35% in 1998. However, the CEECs are also a major export destination for Austrian leather exports and absorbed about 44% of Austria's non-EU leather exports in 1998. Ultimately, the CEECs registered a trade deficit with Austria. Future prospects of the sector are not very favourable, due to decreasing export competitiveness (declining comparative advantage, growing trade deficits, increasing wages in the long run, growing competition from low-cost countries) and increasing import competition on domestic markets with considerable growth potential. Hence it seems that the hard times for the leather and leather products sector in the CEECs are not over but will continue in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Doris Hanzl-Weiss, 1970. "Development and Prospects of the Leather and Leather Products Sector in the Central and Eastern European Countries," wiiw Industry Study 2001_1, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
  • Handle: RePEc:wii:istudy:2001_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://wiiw.ac.at/development-and-prospects-of-the-leather-and-leather-products-sector-in-the-central-and-eastern-european-countries-dlp-92.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pavitt, Keith, 1984. "Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 343-373, December.
    2. Naujoks, Petra & Schmidt, Klaus-Dieter, 1995. "Foreign direct investment and trade in transition countries: Tracing links," Kiel Working Papers 667, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Naujoks, Petra & Schmidt, Klaus-Dieter, 1994. "Outward processing in Central and East European transition countries: Issues and results from German statistics," Kiel Working Papers 631, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Naujoks, Petra & Schmidt, Klaus-Dieter, 1995. "Foreign direct investment and trade in transition countries: Tracing links – A sequel," Kiel Working Papers 704, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. United Nations Industrial Development Organisation, 1998. "International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics 1998," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1352.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schmidt, Klaus-Dieter, 1996. "Small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) in international business: A survey of recent literature," Kiel Working Papers 721, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Doris Hanzl-Weiss, 1970. "Development and Prospects of the Wood and Wood Products Sector in the Central and Eastern European Countries," wiiw Industry Study 1999_3, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    3. Miklos Szanyi, 2002. "Spillover effects and business linkages of foreign-owned firms in Hungary," IWE Working Papers 126, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    4. Doris Hanzl‐Weiß, 2004. "Enlargement and the Textiles, Clothing and Footwear Industry," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 923-945, June.
    5. Schmidt, Klaus-Dieter, 1998. "Emerging East-West collaborative networks: An appraisal," Kiel Working Papers 882, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    6. Francesco Bogliacino & Mario Pianta, 2016. "The Pavitt Taxonomy, revisited: patterns of innovation in manufacturing and services," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 33(2), pages 153-180, August.
    7. Bhumika Gupta & Salil K. Sen, 2019. "Carbon Capture Usage and Storage with Scale-up: Energy Finance through Bricolage Deploying the Co-integration Methodology," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(6), pages 146-153.
    8. Lise Gastaldi, 2009. "Stratégies d'innovation et modes de management de la recherche en entreprise. La formalisation de trois idéaux-types," Post-Print halshs-00384386, HAL.
    9. Balland, Pierre-Alexandre & Boschma, Ron, 2022. "Do scientific capabilities in specific domains matter for technological diversification in European regions?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    10. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    11. Aurora A.C. Teixeira & Rosa Portela Forte, 2009. "Unbounding entrepreneurial intents of university students: a multidisciplinary perspective," FEP Working Papers 322, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    12. Cassiman, Bruno & Perez-Castrillo, David & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2002. "Endogenizing know-how flows through the nature of R&D investments," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 775-799, June.
    13. Rõigas, Kärt, 2011. "Linkage between productivity and innovation in different service sectors," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2011-02, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    14. Keld Laursen, 1998. "How Structural Change Differs, and Why it Matters (for Economic Growth)," DRUID Working Papers 98-25, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    15. Pierre J. Tremblay, 1998. "Informal Thinkering: How Is It Important?," CIRANO Working Papers 98s-13, CIRANO.
    16. Tom Broekel & Matthias Brachert, 2015. "The structure and evolution of inter-sectoral technological complementarity in R&D in Germany from 1990 to 2011," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 755-785, September.
    17. Tether, B. S., 1998. "Small and large firms: sources of unequal innovations?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(7), pages 725-745, November.
    18. Enrico Guzzini & Donato Iacobucci, 2014. "Ownership as R&D incentive in business groups," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 119-135, June.
    19. Francesco Serti & Chiara Tomasi, 2008. "Self-Selection and Post-Entry Effects of Exports: Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 144(4), pages 660-694, December.
    20. da Motta e Albuquerque, Eduardo, 2000. "Domestic patents and developing countries: arguments for their study and data from Brazil (1980-1995)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1047-1060, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wii:istudy:2001_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Customer service (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wiiwwat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.