IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/hnpdps/91322.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Contracting for Primary Health Care in Brazil: The Cases of Bahia and Rio de Janeiro

Author

Listed:
  • Edson Araujo
  • Luciana Cavalini
  • Sabado Girardi
  • Megan Ireland
  • Magnus Lindelow

Abstract

This study presents two case studies, each on a current initiative of contracting for primary health services in Brazil, one for the state of Bahia, the other for the city of Rio de Janeiro. The two initiatives are not linked and their implementation has independently sprung from a search for more effective ways of delivering public primary health care. The two models differ considerably in context, needs, modalities, and outcomes. This paper identifies their strengths and weaknesses, initially by providing a background to universal primary health care in Brazil, paying particular attention to the family health strategy, the driver of the basic health care model. It then outlines the history of contracting for health care within Brazil, before analyzing the two studies. The state of Bahia sought to expand coverage of the family health strategy and increase the quality of services, but had difficulty in attracting and retaining qualified health professionals. Rigidities in the process of public hiring led to a number of isolated contracting initiatives at the municipal level and diverse, often unstable employment contracts. The state and municipalities decided to centralize the hiring of health professionals in order to offer stable positions with career plans and mobility within the state, and chose to create a state foundation, acting under private law to manage and oversee this process. Results have been mixed as lower than expected municipal involvement resulted in relatively high administrative costs and consequent default on municipal financial contributions. The state foundation is undergoing a governance reform and has now diversified beyond hiring for primary care. The municipality of Rio de Janeiro, which until recently relied on an expansive hospital network for health care delivery, sought in particular to expand primary health services. The public health networks suffered from inefficiency and poor quality, and it was therefore decided to contract privately owned and managed, not-for-profit, social organizations to provide primary care services. The move has succeeded in attracting considerable increases in funding for primary health and coverage has increased significantly. Performance initiatives, however, still need fine-tuning and reliable information systems must be implanted in order to evaluate the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Edson Araujo & Luciana Cavalini & Sabado Girardi & Megan Ireland & Magnus Lindelow, 2014. "Contracting for Primary Health Care in Brazil: The Cases of Bahia and Rio de Janeiro," Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Paper Series 91322, The World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:hnpdps:91322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2014/10/10/000442464_20141010130443/Rendered/PDF/913220WP0UHC0C00Box385331B00PUBLIC0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Xingzhu & Hotchkiss, David R. & Bose, Sujata, 2007. "The impact of contracting-out on health system performance: A conceptual framework," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 200-211, July.
    2. Michele Gragnolati & Magnus Lindelow & Bernard Couttolenc, 2013. "Twenty Years of Health System Reform in Brazil : An Assessment of the Sistema Único de Saúde," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15801.
    3. Timothy Besley & Maitreesh Ghatak, 2003. "Incentives, Choice, and Accountability in the Provision of Public Services," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 19(2), pages 235-249, Summer.
    4. Karen Eggleston & Richard Zeckhauser, 2002. "Government Contracting for Health Care," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0202, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monica Viegas Andrade & Augusto Quaresma Coelho & Mauro Xavier Neto & Lucas Resende de Carvalho & Rifat Atun & Marcia C Castro, 2018. "Transition to universal primary health care coverage in Brazil: Analysis of uptake and expansion patterns of Brazil’s Family Health Strategy (1998-2012)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Thomas Hone & Valeria Saraceni & Claudia Medina Coeli & Anete Trajman & Davide Rasella & Christopher Millett & Betina Durovni, 2020. "Primary healthcare expansion and mortality in Brazil’s urban poor: A cohort analysis of 1.2 million adults," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlo Borzaga & Ermanno Tortia, 2004. "Worker involvement in entrepreneurial nonprofit organizations. Toward a new assessment of workers' perceived satisfaction and fairness," Department of Economics Working Papers 0409, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    2. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    3. Laurent Franckx & Isabelle Brose, 2004. "A theoretical framework for incentives in the public sector," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 10(2), pages 1-8.
    4. Simon Burgess & Carol Propper & Marisa Ratto & Emma Tominey, 2017. "Incentives in the Public Sector: Evidence from a Government Agency," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 127(605), pages 117-141, October.
    5. Paul H. Jensen & Robin E. Stonecash, 2004. "The Efficiency of Public Sector Outsourcing Contracts: A Literature Review," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2004n29, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    6. Lê, Gillian & Morgan, Rosemary & Bestall, Janine & Featherstone, Imogen & Veale, Thomas & Ensor, Tim, 2016. "Can service integration work for universal health coverage? Evidence from around the globe," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(4), pages 406-419.
    7. Giuliano Russo & Maria Luiza Levi & Maria Teresa Seabra Soares de Britto e Alves & Bruno Luciano Carneiro Alves de Oliveira & Ruth Helena de Souza Britto Ferreira de Carvalho & Lucas Salvador Andriett, 2020. "How the ‘plates’ of a health system can shift, change and adjust during economic recessions: A qualitative interview study of public and private health providers in Brazil’s São Paulo and Maranhão sta," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Mirco Tonin & Michael Vlassopoulos, 2015. "Are public sector workers different? Cross-European evidence from elderly workers and retirees," IZA Journal of Labor Economics, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Martin Gaynor & Carol Propper & Stephan Seiler, 2012. "Free to Choose? Reform and Demand Response in the English National Health Service," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 12/297, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
    10. Besley, Timothy & Burchardi, Konrad B. & Bevan, Gwen, 2009. "Naming and shaming: the impacts of different regimes on hospital waiting times in England and Wales," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 33775, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Omar Mizel, 2020. "Degree of Adaptation of Jerusalem Palestinian Students at Israeli Academic Colleges," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 7(4), pages 403-430, December.
    12. Mengxue Ji & Zhenming Wu & Dandan Zhu, 2023. "Environmental Vertical Management and Enterprises’ Performance: Evidence from Water Pollution Reduction in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Jean-Michel Plassard & Nhu Tran Thi Thanh, 2009. "Liberté de choix des élèves et concurrence des établissements : un survey de l'analyse du pilotage des systèmes éducatifs par les quasi-marchés," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 99-130.
    14. Aleksandar Vasilev, 2013. "On the cost of rent-seeking by government bureaucrats in a Real-Business-Cycle framework," Working Papers 2013_20, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    15. Vitaly L. Tambovtsev & Irina A. Rozhdestvenskaya, 2023. "Improving public services delivery: Economists’ perspective," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 14(4), pages 2-14, September.
    16. Steffen, Bjarne & Karplus, Valerie & Schmidt, Tobias S., 2022. "State ownership and technology adoption: The case of electric utilities and renewable energy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    17. Haslam Alyson & Nesbit Rebecca & Christensen Robert K., 2019. "The Dynamic Impact of Nonprofit Organizations: Are Health-Related Nonprofit Organizations Associated with Improvements in Obesity at the Community Level?," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-12, October.
    18. repec:ces:ifodic:v:3:y:2005:i:4:p:14567581 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Elaine Kelly & George Stoye, 2015. "New joints: private providers and rising demand in the English National Health Service," IFS Working Papers W15/22, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    20. dos Santos, Anderson Moreira Aristides & Triaca, Lívia Madeira & Tejada, Cesar Augusto Oviedo, 2021. "Evolution of inequalities in health care use among older people in Brazil: Evidence for the period 1998–2019," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    21. Glazer, Amihai, 2004. "Motivating devoted workers," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 427-440, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    administrative costs; administrative rules; aged; ambulatory services; antenatal care; basic health care; birth control; block grants; Bulletin; Care Performance; chronic ... See More + disease; cities; civil society organizations; Clinics; community health; complications; contractual arrangements; deaths; decentralization; delivery of health services; developing countries; diabetes; diseases; drugs; economic inequality; Economic Policy; Economics; economies of scale; emergency care; emergency rooms; employment; equipment; essential medicines; families; Family Health; financial contributions; financial incentives; financial resources; Government capacity; Health Affairs; health care delivery; health care facilities; health care needs; health care provision; health care workers; Health Clinics; Health Coverage; health education; health facilities; health indicators; Health Inequalities; Health Information; Health Information System; Health Information Systems; health infrastructure; Health Organization; health planning; Health Policy; health professionals; health professions; health promotion; health providers; health risks; HEALTH SECTOR; health service; health service delivery; health services; health spending; Health Strategy; Health System; health system performance; Health System Reform; health systems; health workers; Healthy Life; home care; hospital; hospital management; hospital sector; hospital services; hospital system; hospitals; human resource management; human resources; human right; hypertension; illness; income; income countries; income inequality; infant; infant mortality; information asymmetry; integration; international organizations; IUD; labor market; laboratories; large populations; laws; leprosy; Life expectancy; Life expectancy at birth; live births; local governments; low birth weight; management of health; management of patients; maternal mortality; maternal mortality ratio; medical care; medical doctors; medical education; medical procedures; medical residents; Medical School; medical staff; medicines; Millennium Development Goal; Ministry of Health; morbidity; mortality; national level; nongovernmental organizations; nurse; nurses; Nutrition; oral health; outreach activities; patient; patients; Physician; pocket payments; policy decisions; policy makers; political decision; poor quality care; population density; pregnancy; pregnant women; prenatal care; primary care; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; primary health care facilities; primary health care services; primary health facilities; primary health services; primary health system; private sector; progress; provision of care; provision of health services; public administration; public contract; public health; public health system; public policy; PUBLIC SECTOR; public services; quality improvement; quality of care; quality of services; respect; school health; Secretary of Health; service providers; service provision; social action; social participation; social security; social security benefits; social services; socioeconomic development; state policy; State University; strategic priorities; Sustainable Development; tuberculosis; universal access; universities; urban areas; vaccination; woman; workers; workforce; World Health Organization;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:hnpdps:91322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Erika L. Yanick (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.