IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vua/wpaper/1987-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

From static towards dynamic discrete choice modelling : a state of the art review

Author

Listed:
  • Fischer, M.M.

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Econometrie (Free University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics Sciences, Business Administration and Economitrics)

  • Nijkamp, P.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Fischer, M.M. & Nijkamp, P., 1987. "From static towards dynamic discrete choice modelling : a state of the art review," Serie Research Memoranda 0061, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    • Handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:1987-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://degree.ubvu.vu.nl/repec/vua/wpaper/pdf/19870061.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brouwer, F. & Nijkamp, P. & Scholten, H.J., 1983. "Hybrid log-linear models for spatial interaction and stability analysis," Serie Research Memoranda 0017, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    2. Hausman, Jerry A & Wise, David A, 1978. "A Conditional Probit Model for Qualitative Choice: Discrete Decisions Recognizing Interdependence and Heterogeneous Preferences," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(2), pages 403-426, March.
    3. W C Halperin & G D Richardson & N Gale & C M Costanzo, 1984. "A Generalized Procedure for Comparing Models of Spatial Choice," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 16(10), pages 1289-1301, October.
    4. Barentsen, W. & Nijkamp, P., 1986. "Modelling non-linear processes in time and space," Serie Research Memoranda 0050, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    5. Manfred M. Fischer, 1985. "Changing Modes Of Reasoning In Spatial Choice Analysis," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 1-5, January.
    6. D A Hensher, 1976. "The Structure of Journeys and Nature of Travel Patterns," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 8(6), pages 655-672, September.
    7. Anas, Alex, 1983. "Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 13-23, February.
    8. C F Daganzo & Y Sheffi, 1982. "Multinomial Probit with Time-Series Data: Unifying State Dependence and Serial Correlation Models," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 14(10), pages 1377-1388, October.
    9. B Harris & A G Wilson, 1978. "Equilibrium Values and Dynamics of Attractiveness Terms in Production-Constrained Spatial-Interaction Models," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 10(4), pages 371-388, April.
    10. Miyao, Takahiro & Shapiro, Perry, 1981. "Discrete Choice and Variable Returns to Scale," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 22(2), pages 257-273, June.
    11. N Wrigley & R Dunn, 1984. "Stochastic Panel-Data Models of Urban Shopping Behaviour: 2. Multistore Purchasing Patterns and the Dirichlet Model," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 16(6), pages 759-778, June.
    12. Horowitz, Joel L., 1985. "Testing probabilistic discrete choice models of travel demand by comparing predicted and observed aggregate choice shares," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 17-38, February.
    13. Nijkamp, P. & Reggiani, A., 1986. "A synthesis between macro and micro models in spatial interaction analysis, with special reference to dynamics," Serie Research Memoranda 0010, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    14. Horowitz, Joel, 1980. "A utility maximizing model of the demand for multi-destination non-work travel," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 369-386, December.
    15. Quigley, John M., 1985. "Consumer choice of dwelling, neighborhood and public services," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 41-63, February.
    16. Maanen, J.H.A., 1983. "De rationele verwachtingshypothese," Serie Research Memoranda 0013, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    17. Morello, G., 1983. "The 'made in' issue : a comparative research on the image of domestic and foreign products," Serie Research Memoranda 0018, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    18. WAV Clark & J L Onaka, 1985. "An Empirical Test of a Joint Model of Residential Mobility and Housing Choice," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 17(7), pages 915-930, July.
    19. P M Allen & M Sanglier, 1981. "Urban Evolution, Self-Organization, and Decisionmaking," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 13(2), pages 167-183, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nijkamp, P. & Reggiani, A., 1989. "Chaos theory and spatial dynamics," Serie Research Memoranda 0044, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    2. Nijkamp, Peter & Van Wissen, Leo & Rima, Annemarie, 1993. "A household life cycle model for residential relocation behaviour," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 35-53, March.
    3. Tony Bovaird, 1992. "Local Economic Development and the City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 29(3-4), pages 343-368, May.
    4. P Nijkamp & A Reggiani, 1988. "Dynamic Spatial Interaction Models: New Directions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 20(11), pages 1449-1460, November.
    5. Nijkamp, P. & Reggiani, A., 1987. "A new methodology for the analysis of dynamic spatial interaction models," Serie Research Memoranda 0070, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    6. Nijkamp, P. & Reggiani, A., 1989. "Logit models and chaotic behaviour," Serie Research Memoranda 0054, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gijsbers, D. & Nijkamp, P., 1987. "Non-uniform social rates of discount in natural resource models : an overview of arguments and consequences," Serie Research Memoranda 0073, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    2. Nijkamp, P. & Soeteman, F., 1987. "Ecologically sustainable economic development : key issues for strategic environmental management," Serie Research Memoranda 0067, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    3. Dieperink, H. & Nijkamp, P., 1987. "A multiple criteria location model for innovative firms in a communication network," Serie Research Memoranda 0072, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    4. Donna, Javier D., 2018. "Measuring Long-Run Price Elasticities in Urban Travel Demand," MPRA Paper 90059, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. A S Fotheringham, 1986. "Modelling Hierarchical Destination Choice," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 18(3), pages 401-418, March.
    6. Alex Anas & Richard Arnott & Kenneth A. Small, 1998. "Urban Spatial Structure," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1426-1464, September.
    7. Yai, Tetsuo & Iwakura, Seiji & Morichi, Shigeru, 1997. "Multinomial probit with structured covariance for route choice behavior," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 195-207, June.
    8. Michael Wegener, 2011. "Transport in Spatial Models of Economic Development," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Martínez, L. Miguel & Viegas, José Manuel, 2013. "A new approach to modelling distance-decay functions for accessibility assessment in transport studies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 87-96.
    10. Kingsley E. Haynes & Stewart Fotheringham, 1990. "The Impact of Space on the Application Of Discrete Choice Models," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 20(2), pages 39-49, Spring.
    11. P Nijkamp & A Reggiani, 1988. "Dynamic Spatial Interaction Models: New Directions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 20(11), pages 1449-1460, November.
    12. Nijkamp, P. & Salomon, I., 1987. "Telecommunication and the tyranny of space," Serie Research Memoranda 0064, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    13. Lierop, W.F.J. van & Nijkamp, P., 1986. "Disaggregate residential choice models : review and case study," Serie Research Memoranda 0044, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    14. Vredin Johansson, Maria & Heldt, Tobias & Johansson, Per, 2006. "The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 507-525, July.
    15. Ichimura, Hidehiko & Thompson, T. Scott, 1998. "Maximum likelihood estimation of a binary choice model with random coefficients of unknown distribution," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 269-295, June.
    16. Patrick Bayer & Fernando Ferreira & Robert McMillan, 2007. "A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 115(4), pages 588-638, August.
    17. Paleti, Rajesh, 2018. "Generalized multinomial probit Model: Accommodating constrained random parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 248-262.
    18. Erik Stam & Roy Thurik & Peter van der Zwan, 2010. "Entrepreneurial exit in real and imagined markets," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 19(4), pages 1109-1139, August.
    19. Toşa, Cristian & Sato, Hitomi & Morikawa, Takayuki & Miwa, Tomio, 2018. "Commuting behavior in emerging urban areas: Findings of a revealed-preferences and stated-intentions survey in Cluj-Napoca, Romania," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 78-93.
    20. Haaijer, Marinus E., 1996. "Predictions in conjoint choice experiments : the x-factor probit model," Research Report 96B22, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:1987-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: R. Dam (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fewvunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.