IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vnm/wpdman/26.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What do lean managers do? Modeling management behaviors in lean production environments

Author

Listed:
  • Arnaldo Camuffo

    (Department of Management, Bocconi University)

  • Fabrizio Gerli

    (Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnaldo Camuffo & Fabrizio Gerli, 2012. "What do lean managers do? Modeling management behaviors in lean production environments," Working Papers 13, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    • Handle: RePEc:vnm:wpdman:26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://virgo.unive.it/wpideas/storage/2012wp13.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2012
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Véronique Ambrosini & Cliff Bowman, 2001. "Tacit Knowledge: Some Suggestions for Operationalization," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 811-829, September.
    2. Wallace J. Hopp & Mark L. Spearman, 2004. "To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 133-148, August.
    3. Galanou Ekaterini, 2011. "A qualitative approach to middle managers' competences," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(5), pages 553-575, April.
    4. Massimo G. Colombo & Marco Delmastro & Larissa Rabbiosi, 2007. "“High performance” work practices, decentralization, and profitability: evidence from panel data -super-†," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 16(6), pages 1037-1067, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Staccioli, Jacopo & Napoletano, Mauro, 2021. "An agent-based model of intra-day financial markets dynamics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 331-348.
    2. Cirillo, Valeria & Rinaldini, Matteo & Staccioli, Jacopo & Virgillito, Maria Enrica, 2018. "Workers’ awareness context in Italian 4.0 factories," GLO Discussion Paper Series 240, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    3. Brusoni, Stefano & Rosenkranz, Nicole A., 2014. "Reading between the lines: Learning as a process between organizational context and individuals’ proclivities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 147-154.
    4. van Dun, Desirée H. & Hicks, Jeff N. & Wilderom, Celeste P.M., 2017. "Values and behaviors of effective lean managers: Mixed-methods exploratory research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 174-186.
    5. Valeria Cirillo & Matteo Rinaldini & Jacopo Staccioli & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2018. "Workers' intervention authority in Italian 4.0 factories: autonomy and discretion," LEM Papers Series 2018/13, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scherrer-Rathje, Maike & Boyle, Todd A. & Deflorin, Patricia, 2009. "Lean, take two! Reflections from the second attempt at lean implementation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 79-88.
    2. Fang Li & Sheng Zhang & Yuhuan Jin, 2018. "Sustainability of University Technology Transfer: Mediating Effect of Inventor’s Technology Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Miriam Pekarcikova & Peter Trebuna & Marek Kliment & Michal Dic, 2021. "Solution of Bottlenecks in the Logistics Flow by Applying the Kanban Module in the Tecnomatix Plant Simulation Software," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Kroes, James R. & Manikas, Andrew S. & Gattiker, Thomas F., 2018. "Operational leanness and retail firm performance since 1980," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 262-274.
    5. Jan Resenga Maluleka & Omwoyo Bosire Onyancha & Isola Ajiferuke, 2016. "Factors influencing research collaboration in LIS schools in South Africa," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(2), pages 337-355, May.
    6. Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke A. & Meijboom, Kars, 2021. "A qualitative exploration of the wood product supply chain – investigating the possibilities and desirability of an increased demand orientation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Wai-Ki Fu & Hing-Po Lo & Derek Drew, 2006. "Collective learning, collective knowledge and learning networks in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1019-1028.
    8. Maico Roris Severino & Moacir Godinho Filho, 2019. "POLCA system for supply chain management: simulation in the automotive industry," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 1271-1289, March.
    9. Li, Shenxue & Clark, Timothy & Sillince, John, 2018. "Constructing a strategy on the creation of core competencies for African companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 204-213.
    10. Xiaolei Zou & Xiaoxi Chen & Fengling Chen & Chuxin Luo & Hongyan Liu, 2020. "The Influence of Negative Workplace Gossip on Knowledge Sharing: Insight from the Cognitive Dissonance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Hong, Paul & Jagani, Sandeep & Kim, Jinhwan & Youn, Sun Hee, 2019. "Managing sustainability orientation: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 71-81.
    12. Sajjad Jasimuddin & Jun Li & Nicholas Perdikis, 2015. "Linkage between geographic space and knowledge transfer by multinational enterprises: a structural equation approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 769-795, May.
    13. Golesorkhi, Sougand & Mersland, Roy & Randøy, Trond & Shenkar, Oded, 2019. "The Performance Impact of Informal and Formal Institutional Differences in Cross-Border Alliances," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 104-118.
    14. Kurtis Elton & S. Wolfe, 2012. "Water Efficiency and the Professional Plumbing Sector: How Capacity and Capability Influence Knowledge Acquisition and Innovation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(2), pages 595-608, January.
    15. Daniela D. Viana & Iris D. Tommelein & Carlos T. Formoso, 2017. "Using Modularity to Reduce Complexity of Industrialized Building Systems for Mass Customization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Ogink, Ruben H.A.J. & Goossen, Martin C. & Romme, A. Georges L. & Akkermans, Henk, 2023. "Mechanisms in open innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    17. Li, Xiaoqing & Roberts, Joanne & Yan, Yanni & Tan, Hui, 2014. "Knowledge sharing in China–UK higher education alliances," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 343-355.
    18. Munyaradzi Bvuchete & Sara Saartjie Grobbelaar & Joubert van Eeden, 2021. "A Network Maturity Mapping Tool for Demand-Driven Supply Chain Management: A Case for the Public Healthcare Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-29, October.
    19. Nicolas A. Zacharias & Ruth Maria Stock & Subin Im, 2017. "Strategic Givens In New Product Development: Understanding Curvilinear Effects On New Product Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-31, January.
    20. Lehmann, Johannes, 2024. "HR analytics: A centralizing or decentralizing force?," Working papers 2024/13, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Lean thinking; Management behaviors; Toyota production system; Dynamic capabilities; Routines; Competencies;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
    • L23 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Organization of Production

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vnm:wpdman:26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daria Arkhipova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mdvenit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.