IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/upf/upfgen/338.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Solving two production scheduling problems with sequence-dependent set-up times

Author

Listed:

Abstract

In todays competitive markets, the importance of good scheduling strategies in manufacturing companies lead to the need of developing efficient methods to solve complex scheduling problems. In this paper, we studied two production scheduling problems with sequence-dependent setups times. The setup times are one of the most common complications in scheduling problems, and are usually associated with cleaning operations and changing tools and shapes in machines. The first problem considered is a single-machine scheduling with release dates, sequence-dependent setup times and delivery times. The performance measure is the maximum lateness. The second problem is a job-shop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times where the objective is to minimize the makespan. We present several priority dispatching rules for both problems, followed by a study of their performance. Finally, conclusions and directions of future research are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Joao António Noivo & Helena Ramalhinho-Lourenço, 1998. "Solving two production scheduling problems with sequence-dependent set-up times," Economics Working Papers 338, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    • Handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econ-papers.upf.edu/papers/338.pdf
    File Function: Whole Paper
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clyde L. Monma & Chris N. Potts, 1989. "On the Complexity of Scheduling with Batch Setup Times," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 798-804, October.
    2. Carlier, Jacques, 1982. "The one-machine sequencing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 42-47, September.
    3. Robert H. Storer & S. David Wu & Renzo Vaccari, 1992. "New Search Spaces for Sequencing Problems with Application to Job Shop Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(10), pages 1495-1509, October.
    4. C. N. Potts, 1980. "Technical Note—Analysis of a Heuristic for One Machine Sequencing with Release Dates and Delivery Times," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1436-1441, December.
    5. Taillard, E., 1993. "Benchmarks for basic scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 278-285, January.
    6. N.D. Gupta, Jatinder, 1988. "Single facility scheduling with multiple job classes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 42-45, January.
    7. Grabowski, J. & Nowicki, E. & Zdrzalka, S., 1986. "A block approach for single-machine scheduling with release dates and due dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 278-285, August.
    8. Joseph Adams & Egon Balas & Daniel Zawack, 1988. "The Shifting Bottleneck Procedure for Job Shop Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 391-401, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian Artigues & Pierre Lopez & Pierre-Dimitri Ayache, 2005. "Schedule Generation Schemes for the Job-Shop Problem with Sequence-Dependent Setup Times: Dominance Properties and Computational Analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 138(1), pages 21-52, September.
    2. Christian Artigues & Dominique Feillet, 2008. "A branch and bound method for the job-shop problem with sequence-dependent setup times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 135-159, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Egon Balas & Alkis Vazacopoulos, 1998. "Guided Local Search with Shifting Bottleneck for Job Shop Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 262-275, February.
    2. Blazewicz, Jacek & Domschke, Wolfgang & Pesch, Erwin, 1996. "The job shop scheduling problem: Conventional and new solution techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 1-33, August.
    3. Jain, A. S. & Meeran, S., 1999. "Deterministic job-shop scheduling: Past, present and future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 390-434, March.
    4. C N Potts & V A Strusevich, 2009. "Fifty years of scheduling: a survey of milestones," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 41-68, May.
    5. Da Col, Giacomo & Teppan, Erich C., 2022. "Industrial-size job shop scheduling with constraint programming," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    6. Pezzella, Ferdinando & Merelli, Emanuela, 2000. "A tabu search method guided by shifting bottleneck for the job shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 297-310, January.
    7. Susana Fernandes & Helena Ramalhinho-Lourenço, 2007. "A simple optimised search heuristic for the job-shop scheduling problem," Economics Working Papers 1050, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    8. Wenda Zhang & Jason J. Sauppe & Sheldon H. Jacobson, 2021. "An Improved Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for the One-Machine Scheduling Problem with Delayed Precedence Constraints," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1091-1102, July.
    9. Sels, Veronique & Craeymeersch, Kjeld & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2011. "A hybrid single and dual population search procedure for the job shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 512-523, December.
    10. Bierwirth, C. & Kuhpfahl, J., 2017. "Extended GRASP for the job shop scheduling problem with total weighted tardiness objective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 835-848.
    11. Edzard Weber & Anselm Tiefenbacher & Norbert Gronau, 2019. "Need for Standardization and Systematization of Test Data for Job-Shop Scheduling," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Diarmuid Grimes & Emmanuel Hebrard, 2015. "Solving Variants of the Job Shop Scheduling Problem Through Conflict-Directed Search," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 268-284, May.
    13. Federico Alonso-Pecina & José Alberto Hernández & José Maria Sigarreta & Nodari Vakhania, 2020. "Fast Approximation for Scheduling One Machine," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Guinet, Alain & Legrand, Marie, 1998. "Reduction of job-shop problems to flow-shop problems with precedence constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 96-110, August.
    15. Andrzej Bożek, 2020. "Energy Cost-Efficient Task Positioning in Manufacturing Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Jelke J. Hoorn, 2018. "The Current state of bounds on benchmark instances of the job-shop scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 127-128, February.
    17. Murovec, Boštjan, 2015. "Job-shop local-search move evaluation without direct consideration of the criterion’s value," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 320-329.
    18. Ivens, Philip & Lambrecht, Marc, 1996. "Extending the shifting bottleneck procedure to real-life applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 252-268, April.
    19. Ramudhin, Amar & Marier, Philippe, 1996. "The generalized Shifting Bottleneck Procedure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 34-48, August.
    20. Demirkol, Ebru & Mehta, Sanjay & Uzsoy, Reha, 1998. "Benchmarks for shop scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 137-141, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Production-scheduling; set-up times; priority dispatching rules;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econ.upf.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.