IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unm/umamet/1995018.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On the discrete lot-sizing and scheduling problem with Wagner-Whitin costs

Author

Listed:
  • van Eijl, C.A.
  • van Hoesel, C.P.M.

    (Quantitative Economics)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • van Eijl, C.A. & van Hoesel, C.P.M., 1995. "On the discrete lot-sizing and scheduling problem with Wagner-Whitin costs," Research Memorandum 018, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    • Handle: RePEc:unm:umamet:1995018
    DOI: 10.26481/umamet.1995018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/ws/files/1606899/guid-2031c853-ef54-4f7c-b424-c1cbdf1d9771-ASSET1.0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26481/umamet.1995018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pochet, Y. & Wolsey, L. A., 1995. "Algorithms and reformulations for lot sizing problems," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1160, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. T. L. Magnanti & R. Vachani, 1990. "A Strong Cutting Plane Algorithm for Production Scheduling with Changeover Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 456-473, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jans, Raf & Degraeve, Zeger, 2007. "Meta-heuristics for dynamic lot sizing: A review and comparison of solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1855-1875, March.
    2. Thomas L. Magnanti & Trilochan Sastry, 2002. "Facets and Reformulations for Solving Production Planning With Changeover Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 708-719, August.
    3. François Vanderbeck, 1998. "Lot-Sizing with Start-Up Times," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(10), pages 1409-1425, October.
    4. BELVAUX, Gaetan & WOLSEY, Laurence A., 1998. "Lot-sizing problems: modelling issues and a specialized branch-and-cut system BC-PROD," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 1998049, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    5. Stanislaw Bylka, 1997. "Strong turnpike policies in the single‐item capacitated lot‐sizing problem with periodical dynamic parameter," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(8), pages 775-790, December.
    6. Gaetan Belvaux & Laurence A. Wolsey, 2000. "bc --- prod: A Specialized Branch-and-Cut System for Lot-Sizing Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(5), pages 724-738, May.
    7. Milind Dawande & Srinagesh Gavirneni & Yinping Mu & Suresh Sethi & Chelliah Sriskandarajah, 2010. "On the Interaction Between Demand Substitution and Production Changeovers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 682-691, September.
    8. Manfred Padberg, 2005. "Classical Cuts for Mixed-Integer Programming and Branch-and-Cut," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 321-352, October.
    9. Laurence A. Wolsey, 2002. "Solving Multi-Item Lot-Sizing Problems with an MIP Solver Using Classification and Reformulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(12), pages 1587-1602, December.
    10. van Hoesel, C.P.M. & Wagelmans, A.P.M., 1997. "Fully Polynomial Approximation Schemes for Single-Item Capacitated Economic Lot-Sizing Problems," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 9735/A, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    11. Wolsey, Laurence A., 1997. "MIP modelling of changeovers in production planning and scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 154-165, May.
    12. Gothe-Lundgren, Maud & T. Lundgren, Jan & A. Persson, Jan, 2002. "An optimization model for refinery production scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 255-270, August.
    13. Fabrizio Marinelli & Maria Nenni & Antonio Sforza, 2007. "Capacitated lot sizing and scheduling with parallel machines and shared buffers: A case study in a packaging company," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 177-192, March.
    14. Hoesel C.P.M. van & Wagelmans A.P.M., 1997. "Fully polynomial approximation schemes for single-item capacitated economic lot-sizing problems," Research Memorandum 014, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    15. Gaetan Belvaux & Laurence A. Wolsey, 2001. "Modelling Practical Lot-Sizing Problems as Mixed-Integer Programs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(7), pages 993-1007, July.
    16. James D. Blocher & Suresh Chand & Kaushik Sengupta, 1999. "The Changeover Scheduling Problem with Time and Cost Considerations: Analytical Results and a Forward Algorithm," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 559-569, August.
    17. Huang, Kai & Ahmed, Shabbir, 2010. "A stochastic programming approach for planning horizons of infinite horizon capacity planning problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 74-84, January.
    18. Drexl, Andreas & Haase, Knut, 1992. "A new type of model for multi-item capacitated dynamic lotsizing and scheduling," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 286, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    19. Dror, M. & Haouari, M. & Chaouachi, J., 2000. "Generalized spanning trees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 583-592, February.
    20. Weidenhiller, Andreas & Jodlbauer, Herbert, 2009. "Equivalence classes of problem instances for a continuous-time lot sizing and scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 139-149, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unm:umamet:1995018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andrea Willems or Leonne Portz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/meteonl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.