IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulp/sbbeta/2020-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Technologie Blockchain et intermédiation dans l'industrie musicale

Author

Listed:
  • Laurent Bach
  • Remy Guichardaz
  • Eric Schenk

Abstract

A travers la numérisation des contenus, des outils de production et des canaux de diffusion, les évolutions technologiques « récentes » ont entraîné une profonde remise en cause des activités d’intermédiation des acteurs dominants de l’industrie musicale. Après une réorganisation difficile de leurs ressources et de leurs compétences, ces dernières ont su redéployer leurs fonctions d’intermédiation notamment au service d’une stratégie dites « 360° ». Parmi les technologies récentes, la Blockchain est souvent présentée comme un outil de désintermédiation. En effet, la Blockchain permet à des membres d’un réseau décentralisé de stocker et partager de l’information ou d’effectuer des transactions sans qu’il ne soit nécessaire de faire intervenir le moindre organe central de contrôle. Bien qu’encore balbutiant, cette technologie a déjà été utilisée par certains acteurs de l’industrie musicale, par exemple, la chanteuse-compositrice Imogen Heap. Cet article vise à analyser l’impact de la technologie Blockchain sur les différents niveaux d’intermédiations de l’industrie musicale. Pour cela, nous mobilisons les approches théoriques de l’intermédiation telles que décrites dans Guichardaz et al. (2019) et Schenk et al. (2019). Dans le cadre d’une approche qualitative, nous avons mené une série d'entretiens semi-directifs auprès d'acteurs situés à différents niveaux d'intermédiations de l'industrie de la musique, mais aussi de spécialistes de la technologie Blockchain.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurent Bach & Remy Guichardaz & Eric Schenk, 2020. "Technologie Blockchain et intermédiation dans l'industrie musicale," Working Papers of BETA 2020-16, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
  • Handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2020-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://beta.u-strasbg.fr/WP/2020/2020-16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antoine Blanc & Isabelle Huault, 2010. "Reproduction de l'ordre institutionnel face à l'incertitude. Le rôle du discours des majors dans l'industrie musicale," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(4), pages 85-99.
    2. Arthur, W Brian, 1989. "Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(394), pages 116-131, March.
    3. Rémy Guichardaz & Laurent Bach & Julien Penin, 2019. "Music industry intermediation in the digital era and the resilience of the Majors’ oligopoly: the role of transactional capability," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 843-869, August.
    4. Antoine Blanc & Isabelle Huault, 2010. "Reproduction de l'ordre institutionnel face à l'incertitude," Post-Print halshs-00506566, HAL.
    5. Thomas Paris, 2010. "Manager La créativité," Post-Print halshs-00538786, HAL.
    6. Jean-Charles Rochet & Jean Tirole, 2003. "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(4), pages 990-1029, June.
    7. Thomas Paris, 2010. "Manager la créativité," Post-Print halshs-00973155, HAL.
    8. Eric Schenk & Véronique Schaeffer & Julien Pénin & Anne-Laure Mention & Marko Torkkeli, 2020. "Blockchain and the Future of Open Innovation Intermediaries: The Case of Crowdsourcing Platforms," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Pierre-Jean Barlatier & Anne-Laure Mention (ed.), Managing Digital Open Innovation, chapter 15, pages 401-430, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    9. Geoffrey G. Parker & Marshall W. Van Alstyne, 2005. "Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(10), pages 1494-1504, October.
    10. E. Moyon & X. Lecocq, 2007. "La dynamique des réponses stratégiques des majors au changement institutionnel dans l'industrie de la musique," Post-Print hal-00297506, HAL.
    11. Christian Catalini & Joshua S. Gans, 2016. "Some Simple Economics of the Blockchain," NBER Working Papers 22952, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jullien, Bruno & Pavan, Alessandro & Rysman, Marc, 2021. "Two-sided Markets, Pricing, and Network Effects," TSE Working Papers 21-1238, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    2. Rietveld, G.J. & Eggers, J.P., 2016. "Demand Heterogeneity and the Adoption of Platform Complements," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2016-003-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    3. Elizabeth J. Altman & Mary Tripsas, 2013. "Product to Platform Transitions: Organizational Identity Implications," Harvard Business School Working Papers 14-045, Harvard Business School, revised Sep 2014.
    4. Edward G. Anderson & Geoffrey G. Parker & Burcu Tan, 2014. "Platform Performance Investment in the Presence of Network Externalities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 152-172, March.
    5. Timothy Simcoe & Jeremy Watson, 2019. "Forking, Fragmentation, and Splintering," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 283-297, December.
    6. Juha Winter & Sandro Battisti & Thommie Burström & Sakari Luukkainen, 2018. "Exploring the Success Factors of Mobile Business Ecosystems," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-23, June.
    7. de Reuver, Mark & Sørensen, Carsten & Basole, Rahul C., 2018. "The digital platform: a research agenda," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 80669, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Rodolphe Durand & Robert M. Grant & Tammy L. Madsen & David P. McIntyre & Arati Srinivasan, 2017. "Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 141-160, January.
    9. Narayanan, V.K. & Chen, Tianxu, 2012. "Research on technology standards: Accomplishment and challenges," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1375-1406.
    10. Estelle Malavolti, 2016. "Single Till or Dual Till at airports: a Two-Sided Market Analysis," Post-Print hal-01406372, HAL.
    11. Andrei Hagiu & Julian Wright, 2015. "Marketplace or Reseller?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 184-203, January.
    12. Claire M. Weiller & Michael G. Pollitt, 2013. "Platform markets and energy services," Working Papers EPRG 1334, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    13. Pinar Ozcan & Filipe M. Santos, 2015. "The market that never was: Turf wars and failed alliances in mobile payments," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(10), pages 1486-1512, October.
    14. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Markey-Towler, Brendan & Novak, Mikayla & Potts, Jason, 2020. "Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    15. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    16. Esther Gal-Or & Ronen Gal-Or & Nabita Penmetsa, 2018. "The Role of User Privacy Concerns in Shaping Competition Among Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 698-722, September.
    17. Yifan Dou & D. J. Wu, 2021. "Platform Competition Under Network Effects: Piggybacking and Optimal Subsidization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 820-835, September.
    18. Bertin Martens & Frank Mueller-Langer, 2018. "Access to digital car data and competition in aftersales services," JRC Working Papers on Digital Economy 2018-06, Joint Research Centre.
    19. Marco Antonielli & Lapo Filistrucchi, 2011. "Collusion and the political differentiation of newspapers," Working Papers 11-26, NET Institute, revised Nov 2011.
    20. Doh-Shin Jeon & Nikrooz Nasr, 2016. "News Aggregators and Competition among Newspapers on the Internet," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(4), pages 91-114, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Blockchain; Intermédiation; Industrie musicale; Chaîne de valeur.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L14 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation
    • L82 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Entertainment; Media
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2020-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bestrfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.