IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulp/sbbeta/2016-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Did policy reforms really decrease inequalities of access to French higher education? A comparison between Generation 1998 and 2010

Author

Listed:
  • Magali Jaoul-Grammare

Abstract

Since the 1980s, equal opportunities were at the heart of all educational reforms and the fight against inequalities became the priority whether they are geographical, social or cultural. Starting from this point, the aim of this work is to analyze if the various reforms allowed a democratization of higher studies, especially with regard to prestigious courses. We use a multinomial logistic regression to compare the Cereq database Generation 1998 and 2010. Our results show that in spite of a reduction of some inequalities, access to various areas of higher education and more particularly access to prestigious and selective training courses, remains affected by inequalities, in particular by gender and social inequalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Magali Jaoul-Grammare, 2016. "Did policy reforms really decrease inequalities of access to French higher education? A comparison between Generation 1998 and 2010," Working Papers of BETA 2016-02, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    • Handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2016-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://beta.u-strasbg.fr/WP/2016/2016-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Jaoul-Grammare, 2013. "L'évolution des inégalités dans l'enseignement supérieur universitaire français au XXème siècle. L'influence des réformes institutionnelles et des ruptures économiques," Economies et Sociétés (Serie 'Histoire Economique Quantitative'), Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), issue 46, pages 1105-1131, Juillet.
    2. Marie Duru-Bellat & Annick Kieffer & David Reimer, 2010. "Les inégalités d’accès à l’enseignement supérieur : le rôle des filières et des spécialités. Une comparaison entre l’Allemagne de l’Ouest et la France," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 433(1), pages 3-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Magali Jaoul-Grammare, 2017. "Policy Reform and Gender Inequality in French Higher Education: A Two-Generation Comparative Study," Working Papers of BETA 2017-02, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    2. Carr-Hill, Roy, 2020. "Inequalities in access to higher education in Africa: How large are they? Do they mirror the situation in the metropole 60 years ago?," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre Canisius Kamanzi & Tya Collins, 2018. "The Postsecondary Education Pathways of Canadian Immigrants: Who Goes and How Do They Get There?," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(2), pages 58-68, February.
    2. Magali Jaoul-Grammare, 2017. "Policy Reform and Gender Inequality in French Higher Education: A Two-Generation Comparative Study," Working Papers of BETA 2017-02, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Access; France; Higher Education; Inequalities.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C25 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions; Probabilities
    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2016-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bestrfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.