IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-332187.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A resource-based phosphorus footprint for urban diets

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasia Papangelou
  • Edgar Battand Towa Kouokam
  • Wouter Achten
  • Erik Mathijs

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasia Papangelou & Edgar Battand Towa Kouokam & Wouter Achten & Erik Mathijs, 2021. "A resource-based phosphorus footprint for urban diets," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/332187, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/332187
    Note: iiTSE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/332187/3/Papangelou_2021_Environ._Res._Lett._16_075002.pdf
    File Function: Full text for the whole work, or for a work part
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John T. Trimmer & Jeremy S. Guest, 2018. "Recirculation of human-derived nutrients from cities to agriculture across six continents," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(8), pages 427-435, August.
    2. Dana Boyer & Anu Ramaswami, 2020. "Comparing urban food system characteristics and actions in US and Indian cities from a multi‐environmental impact perspective: Toward a streamlined approach," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(4), pages 841-854, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danilo Arcentales-Bastidas & Carla Silva & Angel D. Ramirez, 2022. "The Environmental Profile of Ethanol Derived from Sugarcane in Ecuador: A Life Cycle Assessment Including the Effect of Cogeneration of Electricity in a Sugar Industrial Complex," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Dániel Fróna & János Szenderák & Mónika Harangi-Rákos, 2019. "The Challenge of Feeding the World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Berta Moya & Ruben Sakrabani & Alison Parker, 2019. "Realizing the Circular Economy for Sanitation: Assessing Enabling Conditions and Barriers to the Commercialization of Human Excreta Derived Fertilizer in Haiti and Kenya," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Julian Junghanns & Thomas Beery, 2020. "Ecological Sanitation and Sustainable Nutrient Recovery Education: Considering the Three Fixes for Environmental Problem-Solving," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Ariane Krause & Franziska Häfner & Florian Augustin & Kai M. Udert, 2021. "Qualitative Risk Analysis for Contents of Dry Toilets Used to Produce Novel Recycling Fertilizers," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 1107-1146, November.
    6. Lisa Harseim & Benjamin Sprecher & Cathrin Zengerling, 2021. "Phosphorus Governance within Planetary Boundaries: The Potential of Strategic Local Resource Planning in The Hague and Delfland, The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Biao Li & Yunting Feng & Xiqiang Xia & Mengjie Feng, 2021. "Evaluation of China’s Circular Agriculture Performance and Analysis of the Driving Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Jean Pierre Enriquez, 2020. "Food Self-Sufficiency - Opportunities and Challenges for the Current Food System," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 31(2), pages 23984-23989, October.
    9. FRÓNA Dániel, 2020. "Factors Affecting Food Security," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 39-49, July.
    10. Daniel Puente-Rodríguez & Harmen van Laar & Maayke Veraart, 2022. "A Circularity Evaluation of New Feed Categories in The Netherlands—Squaring the Circle: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-27, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/332187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.