IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucr/wpaper/202414.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Asymmetric AdaBoost for Maximum Score Estimation of High-dimensional Binary Choice Regression Models

Author

Listed:
  • Jianghao Chu

    (JPMorgan Chase & Co., Jersey City, NJ 07310)

  • Tae-Hwy Lee

    (Department of Economics, University of California Riverside)

  • Aman Ullah

    (Department of Economics, University of California, Riverside)

Abstract

Carter Hill's numerous contributions (books and articles) in econometrics stand out especially in pedagogy. An important aspect of his pedagogy is to integrate "theory and practice'' of econometrics, as coined into the titles of his popular books. The new methodology we propose in this paper is consistent with these contributions of Carter Hill. In particular, we bring the maximum score regression of \citet{Manski1975,Manski1985} to high dimension in theory and show that the "Asymmetric AdaBoost'' provides the algorithmic implementation of the high dimensional maximum score regression in practice. Recent advances in machine learning research have not only expanded the horizon of econometrics by providing new methods but also provided the algorithmic aspects of many of traditional econometrics methods. For example, Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) introduced by \citet{Freund1996} has gained enormous success in binary/discrete classification/prediction. In this paper, we introduce the ``Asymmetric AdaBoost'' and relate it to the maximum score regression in the algorithmic perspective. The Asymmetric AdaBoost solves high-dimensional binary classification/prediction problem with state-dependent loss functions. Asymmetric AdaBoost produces a nonparametric classifier via minimizing the "asymmetric exponential risk'' which is a convex surrogate of the non-convex 0-1 risk. The convex risk function gives a huge computational advantage over non-convex risk functions of \citet{Manski1975,Manski1985} especially when the data is high-dimensional. The resulting nonparametric classifier is more robust than the parametric classifiers whose performance depends on the correct specification of the model. We show that the risk of the classifier that Asymmetric AdaBoost produces approaches the Bayes risk which is the infimum of risk that can be achieved by all classifiers. Monte Carlo experiments show that the Asymmetric AdaBoost performs better than the commonly used LASSO-regularized logistic regression when parametric assumption is violated and sample size is large. We apply the Asymmetric AdaBoost to predict business cycle turning points as in \citet{Ng2014a}.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianghao Chu & Tae-Hwy Lee & Aman Ullah, 2024. "Asymmetric AdaBoost for Maximum Score Estimation of High-dimensional Binary Choice Regression Models," Working Papers 202414, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucr:wpaper:202414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economics.ucr.edu/repec/ucr/wpaper/202414.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elliott, Graham & Lieli, Robert P., 2013. "Predicting binary outcomes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 15-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Le-Yu & Lee, Sokbae, 2018. "Best subset binary prediction," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 39-56.
    2. Lahiri, Kajal & Yang, Liu, 2013. "Forecasting Binary Outcomes," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1025-1106, Elsevier.
    3. Graham Elliott & Allan Timmermann, 2016. "Economic Forecasting," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10740.
    4. Aastveit, Knut Are & Anundsen, André K. & Herstad, Eyo I., 2019. "Residential investment and recession predictability," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1790-1799.
    5. Martin Feldkircher & Thomas Gruber & Isabella Moder, 2014. "Using a Threshold Approach to Flag Vulnerabilities in CESEE Economies," Focus on European Economic Integration, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 3, pages 8-30.
    6. Jianghao Chu & Tae-Hwy Lee & Aman Ullah, 2023. "Asymmetric AdaBoost for High-dimensional Maximum Score Regression," Working Papers 202306, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.
    7. Blaskowitz, Oliver & Herwartz, Helmut, 2011. "On economic evaluation of directional forecasts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 1058-1065, October.
    8. Kajal Lahiri & Cheng Yang, 2023. "ROC and PRC Approaches to Evaluate Recession Forecasts," Journal of Business Cycle Research, Springer;Centre for International Research on Economic Tendency Surveys (CIRET), vol. 19(2), pages 119-148, September.
    9. Florios, Kostas & Skouras, Spyros, 2008. "Exact computation of max weighted score estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 86-91, September.
    10. Timothy Christensen & Hyungsik Roger Moon & Frank Schorfheide, 2020. "Robust Forecasting," Papers 2011.03153, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    11. Su, Jiun-Hua, 2021. "Model selection in utility-maximizing binary prediction," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 96-124.
    12. Ghysels, Eric & Babii, Andrii & Chen, Xi & Kumar, Rohit, 2020. "Binary Choice with Asymmetric Loss in a Data-Rich Environment: Theory and an Application to Racial Justice," CEPR Discussion Papers 15418, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Drehmann, Mathias & Juselius, Mikael, 2014. "Evaluating early warning indicators of banking crises: Satisfying policy requirements," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 759-780.
    14. Òscar Jordà & Alan M. Taylor, 2011. "Performance Evaluation of Zero Net-Investment Strategies," NBER Working Papers 17150, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. André K. Anundsen & Karsten Gerdrup & Frank Hansen & Kasper Kragh‐Sørensen, 2016. "Bubbles and Crises: The Role of House Prices and Credit," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(7), pages 1291-1311, November.
    16. Stanislav Anatolyev & Natalia Kryzhanovskaya, 2009. "Directional Prediction of Returns under Asymmetric Loss: Direct and Indirect Approaches," Working Papers w0136, New Economic School (NES).
    17. Travis J. Berge, 2015. "Predicting Recessions with Leading Indicators: Model Averaging and Selection over the Business Cycle," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(6), pages 455-471, September.
    18. Toru Kitagawa & Aleksey Tetenov, 2018. "Who Should Be Treated? Empirical Welfare Maximization Methods for Treatment Choice," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 591-616, March.
    19. Davide Viviano & Jelena Bradic, 2020. "Fair Policy Targeting," Papers 2005.12395, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    20. Davide Viviano & Jess Rudder, 2020. "Policy design in experiments with unknown interference," Papers 2011.08174, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    AdaBoost; Asymmetric Loss; Maximum Score Estimation; Binary Choice Models; High Dimensional Predictors;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General
    • C5 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucr:wpaper:202414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelvin Mac (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deucrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.