IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20230040.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Large Orders in Small Markets: Execution with Endogenous Liquidity Supply

Author

Listed:
  • Agostino Capponi

    (Columbia University)

  • Albert J. Menkveld

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Hongzhong Zhang

    (Columbia University)

Abstract

We model the execution of large uninformed sell orders in the presence of strategic competitive market makers. We solve for the unique symmetric equilibrium of the model in closed-form. Our equilibrium findings provide a rationale for the empirically observed patterns of (i) short orders exhibiting higher intensity of execution and (ii) price pressure potentially subsiding before execution is completed. The model further generates a liquidity surface where the total price impact depends both on the size and duration of the order. Lastly, our analysis demonstrates that large orders unequivocally benefit market makers, while smaller investors stand to benefit only if the order trades with a sufficiently high intensity.

Suggested Citation

  • Agostino Capponi & Albert J. Menkveld & Hongzhong Zhang, 2023. "Large Orders in Small Markets: Execution with Endogenous Liquidity Supply," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 23-040/IV, Tinbergen Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20230040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/23040.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ho, Thomas & Stoll, Hans R., 1981. "Optimal dealer pricing under transactions and return uncertainty," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 47-73, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Campi, Luciano & Zabaljauregui, Diego, 2020. "Optimal market making under partial information with general intensities," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 104612, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Gur Huberman & Dominika Halka, 2001. "Systematic Liquidity," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 24(2), pages 161-178, June.
    3. Rasmus Fatum & Jesper Pedersen & Peter Norman Sørensen, 2010. "Are the Intraday Effects of Central Bank Intervention on Exchange Rate Spreads Asymmetric and State Dependent?," Discussion Papers 10-20, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    4. Gehrig, Thomas & Jackson, Matthew, 1998. "Bid-ask spreads with indirect competition among specialists," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 89-119, April.
    5. Bruno Biais & Fany Declerck & Sophie Moinas, 2016. "Who supplies liquidity, how and when?," BIS Working Papers 563, Bank for International Settlements.
    6. Krassimira Naydenova, 2018. "Built-In Problems in the New European Regulations for the Bulgarian Capital Market," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 106-134.
    7. Corò, Filippo & Dufour, Alfonso & Varotto, Simone, 2013. "Credit and liquidity components of corporate CDS spreads," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5511-5525.
    8. Thomas Henker & Martin Martens, 2010. "Spread decomposition with common spread components," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(2), pages 88-115, April.
    9. Lepone, Andrew & Yang, Jin Young, 2013. "Informational role of market makers: The case of exchange traded CFDs," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 84-92.
    10. Thai Nguyen & Mitja Stadje, 2020. "Utility maximization under endogenous pricing," Papers 2005.04312, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    11. Jakree Koosakul & Ilhyock Shim, 2017. "The beneficial aspect of FX volatility for market liquidity," BIS Working Papers 629, Bank for International Settlements.
    12. Iraklis Kollias & John Leventides & Vassilios G. Papavassiliou, 2024. "On the solution of games with arbitrary payoffs: An application to an over‐the‐counter financial market," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 1877-1895, April.
    13. Thomas Spooner & Rahul Savani, 2020. "Robust Market Making via Adversarial Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2003.01820, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    14. Christoph Kuhn & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2013. "Optimal Liquidity Provision," Papers 1309.5235, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2015.
    15. Pascual, Roberto, 1999. "How does liquidity behave? A multidimensional analysis of NYSE stocks," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB 6433, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    16. Kan Huang & David Simchi-Levi & Miao Song, 2012. "Optimal Market-Making with Risk Aversion," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 541-565, June.
    17. Fleming, Michael J, 2002. "Are Larger Treasury Issues More Liquid? Evidence from Bill Reopenings," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 34(3), pages 707-735, August.
    18. Li, M. Z. & Linton, O., 2021. "Robust Estimation of Integrated and Spot Volatility," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2115, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    19. Daniella Acker & Mathew Stalker & Ian Tonks, 2002. "Daily Closing Inside Spreads and Trading Volumes Around Earnings Announcements," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(9‐10), pages 1149-1179.
    20. Liang Ding, 2009. "Bid-ask spread and order size in the foreign exchange market: an empirical investigation," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(1), pages 98-105.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Liquidity; market makers; welfare covariance matrices;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20230040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.