IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/spaper/001geb.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

They who Have a “Why†to Live for: Purpose Facilitates Positive Employment Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Guangrong Dai

    (Korn Ferry Institute, USA)

  • E. Susanne Blazek

    (Lirio, USA)

  • Signe M. Spencer

    (Korn Ferry Institute, USA)

Abstract

How people find meaning is fundamental to how they approach and experience their work and their personal lives. Purpose is an important construct implied, but often not explicitly discussed, in research on employee experience at work. We conducted a two-phase of research to advance the scientific understanding of individual purpose and the impact of intensity of purpose and types of purpose on work-related outcomes. We developed and validated a purposefulness survey and taxonomies of purpose and values in two samples totaling 1,212 adults from a wide range of educational and employment backgrounds. Popular writing suggests that millennials have the strongest sense of purpose, but this conviction was not validated in this research. Future research will need to elucidate the difference between presence of purpose and searching for purpose, the latter perhaps being stronger for younger than older generations. In our samples, purposefulness predicts work engagement, organizational commitment, perceived fit, planned tenure, and willingness to recommend one’s organization. All purposes do not work equally. Self-transcendent purposes correlate more strongly with purposefulness than do self-focused purposes. Similar pattern has been observed on values. Prosocial values correlate more strongly with purposefulness than do self-oriented values. Employee well-being and engagement are important elements of employment experience. If purpose has a significant impact on employment experience, can purpose be manipulated to produce such a positive outcome? For whom is purpose intervention most effective? The current research has considerable practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangrong Dai & E. Susanne Blazek & Signe M. Spencer, 2020. "They who Have a “Why†to Live for: Purpose Facilitates Positive Employment Experience," Proceedings of the 17th International RAIS Conference, June 1-2, 2020 001geb, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:smo:spaper:001geb
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/001GEB.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rebecca Henderson & Eric Van den Steen, 2015. "Why Do Firms Have "Purpose"? The Firm's Role as a Carrier of Identity and Reputation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 326-330, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ina Ganguli & Marieke Huysentruyt & Chloé Le Coq, 2021. "How Do Nascent Social Entrepreneurs Respond to Rewards? A Field Experiment on Motivations in a Grant Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6294-6316, October.
    2. Sun-Moon Jung & Jae Yong Shin, 2022. "Social Performance Incentives in Mission-Driven Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7631-7657, October.
    3. Giorgio Mion & Cristian R. Loza Adaui, 2020. "Understanding the purpose of benefit corporations: an empirical study on the Italian case," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Burbano, Vanessa & Padilla, Nicolas & Meier, Stephan, 2020. "Gender Differences in Preferences for Meaning at Work," IZA Discussion Papers 13053, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Lea Cassar & Stephan Meier, 2017. "Intentions for Doing Good Matter for Doing Well: The (Negative) Signaling Value of Prosocial Incentives," NBER Working Papers 24109, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Cnossen, Femke & Nikolova, Milena, 2024. "Work Meaningfulness and Effort," IZA Discussion Papers 17182, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Rebecca Henderson, 2021. "Innovation in the 21st Century: Architectural Change, Purpose, and the Challenges of Our Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5479-5488, September.
    8. Anjan V. Thakor, 2021. "Ethics, Culture, and Higher Purpose in Banking: Post-Crisis Governance Developments," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 17(71), pages 1-31, December.
    9. Theodor Vladasel & Simon C. Parker & Randolph Sloof & Mirjam van Praag, 2024. "Revenue drift, incentives, and effort allocation in social enterprises," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 630-651, August.
    10. Vanessa C. Burbano, 2016. "Social Responsibility Messages and Worker Wage Requirements: Field Experimental Evidence from Online Labor Marketplaces," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 1010-1028, August.
    11. Sebastian Raisch & Michael L. Tushman, 2016. "Growing New Corporate Businesses: From Initiation to Graduation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1237-1257, October.
    12. Clark, Daniel R. & Skousen, Bradley R., 2023. "Whistleblowing in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    13. Victoria Hurth & Charles Ebert & Jaideep Prabhu, 2018. "Organisational purpose: the construct and its antecedents and consequences," Working Papers 201802, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    14. Samantha Ragot & Blanche Segrestin, 2018. "Le concept de mission : généalogie et perspectives," Post-Print hal-01897541, HAL.
    15. repec:bla:annpce:v:89:y:2018:i:1:p:157-174 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Bunderson, Stuart & Thakor, Anjan V., 2022. "Higher purpose, banking and stability," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    17. Alvaro Lleo & Miquel Bastons & Carlos Rey & Fernando Ruiz-Perez, 2021. "Purpose Implementation: Conceptualization and Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Valasek, Justin, 2018. "Dynamic reform of public institutions: A model of motivated agents and collective reputation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 94-108.
    19. Anjan V. Thakor, 2023. "Finance research: What are the new frontiers?," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 58(3), pages 453-462, August.
    20. Mu-Jeung Yang, 2021. "The interdependence imperative: business strategy, complementarities, and economic policy," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 37(2), pages 392-415.
    21. Anette Ahsen & Kevin Gauch, 2022. "Opportunities and Challenges of Purpose-Led Companies: An Empirical Study Through Expert Interviews," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(3), pages 198-211, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:spaper:001geb. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.