IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iefpro/14115959.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

GRI-based Sustainability Reporting in the European Union Energy Sector: A Comprehensive Overview

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Zrnic

    (Faculty of Economics in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek)

  • Dubravka Pekanov

    (Faculty of Economics in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek)

  • Ivana Fosi?

    (Faculty of Economics in Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek)

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of sustainability reporting practices in the European Union, focusing on indicators disclosed by energy companies in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines and standards. By analyzing data from sustainability reports of energy companies between 2016 and 2019, the paper investigates the evolution of indicator disclosure over time. The findings reveal that economic indicators have been consistently reported without significant fluctuations, while environmental indicators show a slight decline since 2017, albeit without major deviations. On the other hand, social indicators demonstrate a positive trend throughout the entire period, particularly when compared to the lowest disclosure rate in 2016. The analysis highlights the voluntary nature of GRI standards' application and the limited disclosure of economic indicators by companies. It underscores the need to include economic indicators in sustainability reports to ensure a comprehensive representation of all three dimensions of sustainability. Furthermore, the study suggests narrowing down GRI standards as many indicators are underutilized in the analyzed companies. While the development of sustainability reporting standards for EU companies is underway, global comparability remains a challenge. Therefore, the paper envisions the future development of a global sustainability reporting framework, akin to financial reporting, to enhance organizations' assessment, comparability, and improvement of sustainability performance. In this regard, the GRI framework, based on its current application, holds potential for further refinement and formalization. Ultimately, achieving adequate standardization and harmonization will be crucial in advancing the field of sustainability reporting. This is particulary important for investors interested in making informed decisions based on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Zrnic & Dubravka Pekanov & Ivana Fosi?, 0000. "GRI-based Sustainability Reporting in the European Union Energy Sector: A Comprehensive Overview," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 14115959, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:sek:iefpro:14115959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/international-conference-on-economics-finance-and-business-prague-2023-1/table-of-content/detail?cid=141&iid=028&rid=15959
    File Function: First version, 0000
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klaus Dingwerth & Margot Eichinger, 2010. "Tamed Transparency: How Information Disclosure under the Global Reporting Initiative Fails to Empower," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 10(3), pages 74-96, August.
    2. Nurlan Orazalin & Monowar Mahmood, 2019. "Determinants of GRI-based sustainability reporting: evidence from an emerging economy," Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 140-164, September.
    3. María del Mar Alonso‐Almeida & Josep Llach & Frederic Marimon, 2014. "A Closer Look at the ‘Global Reporting Initiative’ Sustainability Reporting as a Tool to Implement Environmental and Social Policies: A Worldwide Sector Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(6), pages 318-335, November.
    4. Colin Higgins & Wendy Stubbs & Markus Milne, 2018. "Is Sustainability Reporting Becoming Institutionalised? The Role of an Issues-Based Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 309-326, January.
    5. Najul Laskar & Santi Gopal Maji, 2016. "Corporate sustainability reporting practices in India: myth or reality?," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 625-641, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sunday Nosa Ugbogbo & Tracy Eghosa Obamwonyi, 2023. "Sustainability Reporting and Financial Performance of Quoted Consumer Goods Companies in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(6), pages 1608-1636, June.
    2. Ogah, Inalegwu & Dr Lambe, Isaac & Professor Aza, Mangba Solomon, 2024. "Governance and Social Sustainability Reporting and Financial Performance of Listed Oil and Gas Firms in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(1), pages 651-670, January.
    3. Laura Sasse-Werhahn, 2019. "The Practical Wisdom behind the GRI," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 71-84, July.
    4. David Monciardini & Guido Conaldi, 2019. "The European regulation of corporate social responsibility: The role of beneficiaries' intermediaries," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 240-259, June.
    5. María Del Mar Alonso‐Almeida & Josep Llach, 2019. "Socially responsible companies: Are they the best workplace for millennials? A cross‐national analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 238-247, January.
    6. E. Keith Smith & Dennis Kolcava & Thomas Bernauer, 2024. "Stringent sustainability regulations for global supply chains are supported across middle-income democracies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Philipp Pattberg, 2017. "The emergence of carbon disclosure: Exploring the role of governance entrepreneurs," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(8), pages 1437-1455, December.
    8. Christina W. Y. Wong & Chee Yew Wong & Sakun Boon-itt & Ailie K. Y. Tang, 2021. "Strategies for Building Environmental Transparency and Accountability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Nicolas Garcia‐Torea & Belen Fernandez‐Feijoo & Marta De La Cuesta, 2020. "CSR reporting communication: Defective reporting models or misapplication?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 952-968, March.
    10. Ki‐Hoon Lee, 2017. "Does Size Matter? Evaluating Corporate Environmental Disclosure in the Australian Mining and Metal Industry: A Combined Approach of Quantity and Quality Measurement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 209-223, February.
    11. Othmar Manfred Lehner & Alex Nicholls & Sarah Beatrice Kapplmüller, 2022. "Arenas of Contestation: A Senian Social Justice Perspective on the Nature of Materiality in Impact Measurement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 971-989, September.
    12. Ajay Kumar & Jyotirani Gupta & Niladri Das, 2022. "Revisiting the influence of corporate sustainability practices on corporate financial performance: An evidence from the global energy sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3231-3253, November.
    13. Tsalis, Thomas A. & Nikolaou, Ioannis E. & Konstantakopoulou, Fotini & Zhang, Ying & Evangelinos, Konstantinos I., 2020. "Evaluating the corporate environmental profile by analyzing corporate social responsibility reports," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 63-75.
    14. Xing Chen & Bert Scholtens, 2018. "The urge to act: A comparison of active and passive socially responsible investment funds in the United States," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1154-1173, November.
    15. Varsha Sehgal & Naval Garg & Jagvinder Singh, 2023. "Impact of sustainability performance & reporting on a firm’s reputation," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 228-240, February.
    16. Martin Ritter & Heiner Schanz, 2021. "Carsharing Business Models’ Strategizing Mindsets Regarding Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Anna Maria Ferrari & Lucrezia Volpi & Martina Pini & Cristina Siligardi & Fernando Enrique García-Muiña & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2019. "Building a Sustainability Benchmarking Framework of Ceramic Tiles Based on Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-30, January.
    18. Gunnar Gutsche & Bernhard Zwergel, 2016. "Information barriers and SRI market participation – Can sustainability and transparency labels help?," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201624, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    19. Patrick Velte, 2022. "Does sustainable corporate governance have an impact on materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting? International evidence," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1655-1670, December.
    20. Patten, Dennis M. & Zhao, Na, 2014. "Standalone CSR reporting by U.S. retail companies," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 132-144.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sustainability reporting; GRI standards; Energy companies; Sustainable investment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q49 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Other

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iefpro:14115959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.