IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sek/iacpro/1003266.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Designing ERP Software Evaluation Procedure for a Governmental Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Kerim Goztepe

    (Army War College)

  • Sahin CETIN

    (Army War College)

  • Alper Kayaalp

    (Army War College)

Abstract

An enterprise resource planning (ERP) system is regarded a solution approach for any organization. It is an information system to plan and manage whole firms? or organizations? function. Once it is adopted, it provides many useful tools in management. This study expose an evaluation procedure of ERP software selection for any governmental organization. The proposed evaluation framework use step by step process in order to reach final decision. It also advise some decision making techniques for ERP alternatives applying selected criteria. It is a fact that an ERP software cannot meet all needed company functionalities of a governmental organization. Thus, organization must choose a flexible ERP system for its requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerim Goztepe & Sahin CETIN & Alper Kayaalp, 2015. "Designing ERP Software Evaluation Procedure for a Governmental Organization," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 1003266, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:1003266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/proceedings/international-academic-conference-rome/table-of-content/detail?cid=10&iid=060&rid=3266
    File Function: First version, 2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei, Chun-Chin & Chien, Chen-Fu & Wang, Mao-Jiun J., 2005. "An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 47-62, April.
    2. Umble, Elisabeth J. & Haft, Ronald R. & Umble, M. Michael, 2003. "Enterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 241-257, April.
    3. Adina UTA & Iulian INTORSUREANU & Rodica MIHALCA, 2007. "Criteria for the selection of ERP software," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 0(2), pages 63-66.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hasan AL JAFA, 2020. "A Case Study For The Crm Software Selection Process In A Transportation Company Using An Integrated Ahp And Qfd Approach," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 24, pages 337-351, December.
    2. Dimitra Skoumpopoulou & Catherine Moss, 2018. "The Importance of Culture in ERP Adoption – A Case Study Analysis," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 4(3), pages 259-278, July.
    3. He-Yau Kang & Amy H. I. Lee & Yao-Chuan Chan, 2019. "An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating Business Process Information Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Molnár Bálint & Szabó Gyula & Benczúr András, 2013. "Selection Process of ERP Systems," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 4(1), pages 36-48, March.
    5. B S Ahn & S H Choi, 2008. "ERP system selection using a simulation-based AHP approach: a case of Korean homeshopping company," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(3), pages 322-330, March.
    6. Minodora Ursacescu & Dan Popescu & Cristina State & Ion Smeureanu, 2019. "Assessing the Greenness of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems through Green IT Solutions: A Romanian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-32, August.
    7. Hasan AL JAFA, 2020. "Improving Erp Software Selection Process By Integrating Qfd With Ahp Approach," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 16, pages 157-167, December.
    8. Ge, Liping & Voß, Stefan, 2009. "ERP application in China: An overview," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 501-507, November.
    9. Fındık, Derya & Beyhan, Berna, 2014. "A Perceptual Measure of Innovation Performance: Micro Level Evidence from Turkey," MPRA Paper 60961, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Kevin Kam Fung Yuen, 2022. "Decision models for information systems planning using primitive cognitive network process: comparisons with analytic hierarchy process," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1759-1785, July.
    11. Malgorzata Plaza, 2008. "Team performance and information system implementation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 347-359, July.
    12. Yu-Hsin Lin & Hsien-Ching Chen & Chen-Yu Chien & Chih-Hung Tsai & Min-Jer Lu, 2014. "A Study of Selecting Criteria for Material Substitution under Green Environmental Consideration," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(1), pages 459-473, January.
    13. Büşra Dağci Yüksel & Filiz Ersöz, 2024. "Evaluation of ERP software selection criteria with fuzzy AHP approach: an application in the metal production enterprises in the aviation industry," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 15(6), pages 2656-2667, June.
    14. Fritz, M. & Canavari, M., 2008. "Management of Perceived Risks in E-Business for Efficient Food Supply Network Management: The Case of Trust," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 43, March.
    15. Evelina Pecherskaya & Yuri Kamaletdinov & Aleksandr Zhabin & Polina Grishina, 2015. "Key Success Factors Analysis in the Context of Enterprise Resourcesplanning Systems Projects Implementation," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(5), pages 133-133, May.
    16. Sabina POPESCU, 2014. "Erp Systems €“ Software Solutions For Company’S Management," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(1), pages 54-59, March.
    17. Martin Quinn & Peter Cleary & Catherine Batt & Pall Rikhardsson, 2021. "Accounting and Information Systems in Irish Family SME: Professionalisation Effects," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 20(3), pages 454-476, September.
    18. Martin Quinn & Martin R. W. Hiebl & Ken Moores & Justin B. Craig, 2018. "Future research on management accounting and control in family firms: suggestions linked to architecture, governance, entrepreneurship and stewardship," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 529-546, February.
    19. Li, Ling & Markowski, Carol & Xu, Li & Markowski, Edward, 2008. "TQM--A predecessor of ERP implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 569-580, October.
    20. Faramondi, Luca & Oliva, Gabriele & Setola, Roberto & Bozóki, Sándor, 2023. "Robustness to rank reversal in pairwise comparison matrices based on uncertainty bounds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 676-688.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP); Organization; ERP evaluation procedure; Decision making.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M20 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:iacpro:1003266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.