IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rug/rugwps/06-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pre-emptive resource-constrained project scheduling with setup times

Author

Listed:
  • D. DEBELS
  • M. VANHOUCKE

Abstract

Resource-constrained project scheduling with activity pre-emption assumes that activities are allowed to be interrupted and restarted later in the schedule at no extra cost. In the current paper, we extend this pre-emptive scheduling problem with setup times between activity interruptions and the possibility to fast track pre-emptive subparts of activities. The contribution of the paper is twofold. First, we present an optimal branch-and-bound procedure for the pre-emptive resource-constrained project scheduling problem with setup times and fast tracking options. Second, we test the impact of these pre-emptive extensions to the quality of the schedule from a lead-time point-of-view.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Debels & M. Vanhoucke, 2006. "Pre-emptive resource-constrained project scheduling with setup times," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/391, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    • Handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:06/391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wps-feb.ugent.be/Papers/wp_06_391.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. Debels & M. Vanhoucke, 2006. "The impact of various activity assumptions on the lead-time and resource utilization of resource-constrained projects," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 06/385, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    2. Brucker, Peter & Drexl, Andreas & Mohring, Rolf & Neumann, Klaus & Pesch, Erwin, 1999. "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 3-41, January.
    3. Anthony A. Mastor, 1970. "An Experimental Investigation and Comparative Evaluation of Production Line Balancing Techniques," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(11), pages 728-746, July.
    4. Kolisch, R. & Padman, R., 2001. "An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 249-272, June.
    5. Erik Demeulemeester & Willy Herroelen, 1992. "A Branch-and-Bound Procedure for the Multiple Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(12), pages 1803-1818, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Weikang & Vanhoucke, Mario & Coelho, José, 2023. "A prediction model for ranking branch-and-bound procedures for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 579-595.
    2. Weglarz, Jan & Józefowska, Joanna & Mika, Marek & Waligóra, Grzegorz, 2011. "Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes - A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 177-205, February.
    3. Debels, Dieter & De Reyck, Bert & Leus, Roel & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2006. "A hybrid scatter search/electromagnetism meta-heuristic for project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(2), pages 638-653, March.
    4. Valls, Vicente & Ballestin, Francisco & Quintanilla, Sacramento, 2005. "Justification and RCPSP: A technique that pays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 375-386, September.
    5. D. Debels & M. Vanhoucke, 2005. "A Decomposition-Based Heuristic For The Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 05/293, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    6. M. Vanhoucke, 2007. "A genetic algorithm to investigate the trade-off between project lead time and net present value," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/456, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    7. Wendi Tian & Erik Demeulemeester, 2014. "Railway scheduling reduces the expected project makespan over roadrunner scheduling in a multi-mode project scheduling environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 271-291, February.
    8. Dieter Debels & Mario Vanhoucke, 2007. "A Decomposition-Based Genetic Algorithm for the Resource-Constrained Project-Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 457-469, June.
    9. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Bouleimen, K. & Lecocq, H., 2003. "A new efficient simulated annealing algorithm for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem and its multiple mode version," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(2), pages 268-281, September.
    11. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2008. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Working Paper Series 02/2008, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).
    12. Debels, D. & Vanhoucke, M., 2006. "Meta-Heuristic resource constrained project scheduling: solution space restrictions and neighbourhood extensions," Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2006-18, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.
    13. Moumene, Khaled & Ferland, Jacques A., 2009. "Activity list representation for a generalization of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 46-54, November.
    14. Tseng, Lin-Yu & Chen, Shih-Chieh, 2006. "A hybrid metaheuristic for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 707-721, December.
    15. Andrzej Kozik, 2017. "Handling precedence constraints in scheduling problems by the sequence pair representation," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 445-472, February.
    16. Xiong, Jian & Leus, Roel & Yang, Zhenyu & Abbass, Hussein A., 2016. "Evolutionary multi-objective resource allocation and scheduling in the Chinese navigation satellite system project," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 662-675.
    17. Lova, Antonio & Tormos, Pilar & Cervantes, Mariamar & Barber, Federico, 2009. "An efficient hybrid genetic algorithm for scheduling projects with resource constraints and multiple execution modes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 302-316, February.
    18. Kemmoé Tchomté, Sylverin & Gourgand, Michel, 2009. "Particle swarm optimization: A study of particle displacement for solving continuous and combinatorial optimization problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 57-67, September.
    19. Vaseghi, Forough & Martens, Annelies & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2024. "Analysis of the impact of corrective actions for stochastic project networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(2), pages 503-518.
    20. Eleni Hadjiconstantinou & Evelina Klerides, 2010. "A new path-based cutting plane approach for the discrete time-cost tradeoff problem," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 313-336, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rug:rugwps:06/391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nathalie Verhaeghe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.