IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rnp/wpaper/2861.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of international experience in using the cost-benefit comparison method for evaluating socially significant projects and development of proposals for its application in Russia
[Анализ Международного Опыта Использования Метода Сопоставления Издержек И Выгод Для Оценки Общественно Значимых Проектов И Разработка Предложений По Его Применению В России]

Author

Listed:
  • Melnikov, Roman (Мельников, Роман)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Krasnoshekov, Valentin (Краснощеков, Валентин)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Borovikova, Elena (Боровикова, Елена)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Margolin, Andrey (Марголин, Андрей)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Gerasimov, Ivan (Герасимов, Иван)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

  • Serikov, Pavel (Сериков, Павел)

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA))

Abstract

The paper considers the international experience of applying cost benefit analysis for the assessment of socially important projects and programmes, substantiating suggestions to adapt it to the Russian context. A critique is provided of the methodologies adopted by the Russian authorities and development institutions to evaluate infrastructure projects and programmes funded from the state budget and employing public-private partnership schemes. A method for the assessment of demonstration effects of import substitution projects is justified, which is based on the use of the real option framework. The possibilities for practical application of a cost benefit methodology under the Russian conditions are demonstrated via the example of financial models of the creation of a pharmaceutical plant and a long distance oil pipeline. The authors suggest a methodology for the assessment of the economic efficiency of investment into land infrastructure development, as piloted in the Southern Federal District.

Suggested Citation

  • Melnikov, Roman (Мельников, Роман) & Krasnoshekov, Valentin (Краснощеков, Валентин) & Borovikova, Elena (Боровикова, Елена) & Margolin, Andrey (Марголин, Андрей) & Gerasimov, Ivan (Герасимов, Иван) & , 2016. "Analysis of international experience in using the cost-benefit comparison method for evaluating socially significant projects and development of proposals for its application in Russia [Анализ Межд," Working Papers 2861, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:2861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/wpaper/2861.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodrik, Dani, 2004. "Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century," Working Paper Series rwp04-047, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    2. Neil Foster-McGregor & Mario Holzner & Michael Landesmann & Johannes Pöschl & Robert Stehrer & Roman Stöllinger, 2013. "A ‘Manufacturing Imperative’ in the EU – Europe's Position in Global Manufacturing and the Role of Industrial Policy," wiiw Research Reports 391, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    3. Sanjaya Lall, 2013. "Reinventing Industrial Strategy: The Role Of Government Policy In Building Industrial Competitiveness," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 14(2), pages 785-829, November.
    4. John B. Gilmour, 2007. "Implementing OMB's Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART): Meeting the Challenges of Integrating Budget and Performance," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 1-40.
    5. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 637-654, May-June.
    6. Anthony Murphy & Brendan M. Walsh & Frank Barry, 2003. "The economic appraisal system for projects seeking support from the industrial development agencies," Open Access publications 10197/1600, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    7. Honohan, Patrick, 1998. "Key issues of Cost-Benefit Methodology for Irish Industrial Policy," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number GRS172.
    8. Massimo FLORIO & Emanuela SIRTORI, 2014. "The Evaluation of Research Infrastructures: a Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework," Departmental Working Papers 2014-10, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    9. Myers, Stewart C., 1977. "Determinants of corporate borrowing," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 147-175, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shafaeddin, Mehdi, 2010. "Trade liberalization, industrialization and development; experience of recent decades," MPRA Paper 26355, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Jiyeon Yun & James M. Carson & David L. Eckles, 2023. "Executive compensation and corporate risk management," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(2), pages 521-557, June.
    3. Alexander Reisz, 1999. "Temporal Resolution of Uncertainty, the Investment Policy of Levered Firms and Corporate Debt Yields," New York University, Leonard N. Stern School Finance Department Working Paper Seires 99-044, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business-.
    4. Rafal M. Wojakowski & M. Shahid Ebrahim & Aziz Jaafar & Murizah Osman Salleh, 2019. "Can Loan Valuation Adjustment (LVA) approach immunize collateralized debt from defaults?," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 141-158, May.
    5. Dapena, Jose Pablo, 2003. "On the Valuation of Companies with Growth Opportunities," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 6(1), pages 1-24, May.
    6. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Chen, Xiaoyan & Ling, Xin & Smith, Tom & Zhu, Yushu, 2017. "Research in finance: A review of influential publications and a research agenda," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 188-199.
    7. Luc Renneboog & Peter G. Szilagyi, 2008. "Corporate Restructuring and Bondholder Wealth," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 14(4), pages 792-819, September.
    8. Anatoli Segura & Javier Suarez, 2019. "Optimally Solving Banks' Legacy Problems," Working Papers wp2019_1910, CEMFI.
    9. M. Dutordoir & L. Van De Gucht, 2004. "Are European Convertibles More Debt-Like than the US Issues? An Empirical Analysis," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(4), pages 533-568.
    10. Hörnlein, Lena, 2019. "The value of gas-fired power plants in markets with high shares of renewable energy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1078-1098.
    11. Kroniger, Daniel & Madlener, Reinhard, 2014. "Hydrogen storage for wind parks: A real options evaluation for an optimal investment in more flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 931-946.
    12. Frank Figge, 2005. "Value‐based environmental management. From environmental shareholder value to environmental option value," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 19-30, March.
    13. Balibrea-Iniesta, José & Rodríguez-Monroy, Carlos & Núñez-Guerrero, Yilsy María, 2021. "Economic analysis of the German regulation for electrical generation projects from biogas applying the theory of real options," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    14. Cuypers, I.R.P., 2009. "Essays on equity joint ventures, uncertainty and experience," Other publications TiSEM 8dc79e86-c625-467f-a450-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Lee, Shun-Chung & Shih, Li-Hsing, 2010. "Renewable energy policy evaluation using real option model -- The case of Taiwan," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(Supplemen), pages 67-78, September.
    16. Marco Antonio Guimaraes Dias & Jose Paulo Teixeira, 2010. "Continuous-Time Option Games: Review of Models and Extensions," Multinational Finance Journal, Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 14(3-4), pages 219-254, September.
    17. Min Jung Kang & Y. Han (Andy) Kim & Qunfeng Liao, 2020. "Do bankers on the board reduce crash risk?," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 26(3), pages 684-723, June.
    18. Madlener, Reinhard & Stoverink, Simon, 2012. "Power plant investments in the Turkish electricity sector: A real options approach taking into account market liberalization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 124-134.
    19. Twine, Edgar E. & Kiiza, Barnabas & Bashaasha, Bernard, 2015. "The Flexible Accelerator Model of Investment: An Application to Ugandan Tea- Processing Firms," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Xiayan Zhang & Jingbo Yin, 2023. "Assessment of investment decisions in bulk shipping through fuzzy real options analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(1), pages 122-139, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:wpaper:2861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.