IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oec/govkaa/5l4qdwm4xpzw.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing OMB's Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART): Meeting the Challenges of Integrating Budget and Performance

Author

Listed:
  • John B. Gilmour

Abstract

This article examines the PART initiative of the United States Office of Management and Budget from a practical standpoint: how federal agencies have dealt with the requirements of PART and what strategies they have employed to be successful. The article highlights four challenges that confront both agencies and OMB as they work to complete assessments of all 1 000 programmes and describes approaches that agencies are taking to meet these challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • John B. Gilmour, 2007. "Implementing OMB's Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART): Meeting the Challenges of Integrating Budget and Performance," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 1-40.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:govkaa:5l4qdwm4xpzw
    DOI: 10.1787/budget-v7-art5-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v7-art5-en
    Download Restriction: Full text available to READ online. PDF download available to OECD iLibrary subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/budget-v7-art5-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. L. A. Tsvetkova, 2016. "Model For Shaping A System Composed Of Measurable Indicators For Defining Priority Areas Using Us National Institutes Of Healthcare As A Role Example," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 2(1).
    2. Anne Drumaux, 2011. "Les anomalies dans les réformes publiques: le pourquoi et le comment?," Working Papers CEB 11-061, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Melnikov, Roman (Мельников, Роман) & Krasnoshekov, Valentin (Краснощеков, Валентин) & Borovikova, Elena (Боровикова, Елена) & Margolin, Andrey (Марголин, Андрей) & Gerasimov, Ivan (Герасимов, Иван) & , 2016. "Analysis of international experience in using the cost-benefit comparison method for evaluating socially significant projects and development of proposals for its application in Russia [Анализ Межд," Working Papers 2861, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govkaa:5l4qdwm4xpzw. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oecddfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.