IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rii/rridoc/18.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Criticity Of The Asymmetries’ Management In The Technology Transfer Process Case Study On The Onera Sme Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Florin PAUN

    (ONERA (French Aerospace lab))

  • Philippe RICHARD

    (ONERA (French Aerospace lab))

Abstract

The technology transfer process between a public laboratory and a company has been the subject of many publications and has been widely discussed in economic theories. This article will highlight several new identified asymmetries occurring between the different actors being part of the technology transfer process. We will deal mainly with the specificities related to this process in France, showcasing the technology transfer arising from the domain of aerospace and defense. These specificities are in particular related to the characteristics of the French SMEs and public research laboratories. The analysis developed below is based on the recent experience of one of the most dynamic TTO in France and its active involvement in defining the Business Model for the future Technology Transfer Accelerator Structures (SATT) planned by the French Government as one of the major tools of the “Grand Emprunt”.

Suggested Citation

  • Florin PAUN & Philippe RICHARD, 2010. "The Criticity Of The Asymmetries’ Management In The Technology Transfer Process Case Study On The Onera Sme Strategy," Working Papers 18, Réseau de Recherche sur l’Innovation. / Research Network on Innovation.
    • Handle: RePEc:rii:rridoc:18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rrifr.univ-littoral.fr/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/doc18.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Maskell & Harald Bathelt & Anders Malmberg, 2005. "Building Global Knowledge Pipelines The Role of Temporary Clusters," DRUID Working Papers 05-20, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    2. Stiglitz, Joseph E & Weiss, Andrew, 1992. "Asymmetric Information in Credit Markets and Its Implications for Macro-economics," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 694-724, October.
    3. North, Douglass C, 1994. "Economic Performance through Time," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(3), pages 359-368, June.
    4. Peter Maskell & Harald Bathelt & Anders Malmberg, 2005. "Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(8), pages 997-1013, September.
    5. Elyse Golob, 2006. "Capturing the Regional Economic Benefits of University Technology Transfer: A Case Study," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 685-695, November.
    6. Nicolas Mouchnino & Olivier Sautel, 2007. "Coordination productive et enjeux concurrentiels au sein d'une industrie modulaire : l'exemple d'Airbus," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 135-153.
    7. Robin Cowan & Nicolas Jonard & Jean-Benoît Zimmermann, 2003. "Complémentarités cognitives et production de connaissances nouvelles. Une analyse en termes de réseaux," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 103(1), pages 253-274.
    8. George A. Akerlof, 1970. "The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 84(3), pages 488-500.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florin PAUN & Nick VON TUNZELMANN & Philippe RICHARD, 2011. "From Managing Informational Asymmetries Towards A Systemic Asymmetries Approach In Technology Transfer: A Critique Based On The Sme Strategy At Onera – The French Aerospace Labtm," Working Papers 237, Laboratoire de Recherche sur l'Industrie et l'Innovation. ULCO / Research Unit on Industry and Innovation.
    2. Lawrence Christiano & Daisuke Ikeda, 2011. "Government Policy, Credit Markets and Economic Activity," NBER Working Papers 17142, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Lucio Biggiero, 2006. "Industrial and knowledge relocation strategies under the challenges of globalization and digitalization: the move of small and medium enterprises among territorial systems," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 443-471, November.
    4. Haucap, Justus, 2017. "The rule of law and the emergence of market exchange: A new institutional economic perspective," DICE Discussion Papers 276, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    5. Nicola Francesco Dotti & André Spithoven, 2017. "Spatial perspectives on knowledge brokers: Evidence from Brussels," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(10), pages 2203-2222, October.
    6. Fiorenza Belussi & Silvia R. Sedita, 2012. "Industrial Districts as Open Learning Systems: Combining Emergent and Deliberate Knowledge Structures," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 165-184, April.
    7. Bertocco Giancarlo, 2004. "Are banks really special? A note on the theory of financial intermediaries," Economics and Quantitative Methods qf04021, Department of Economics, University of Insubria.
    8. Aldebert, Bénédicte & Dang, Rani J. & Longhi, Christian, 2011. "Innovation in the tourism industry: The case of Tourism@," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 1204-1213.
    9. Enzo Dia, 2004. "Imperfect Information and Monopolistic Pricing in the Banking Industry," Working Papers 74, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised May 2004.
    10. W. Robert Brazelton & Charles J. Whalen, 2011. "Towards a synthesis of Institutional and Post Keynsian economics," Chapters, in: Charles J. Whalen (ed.), Financial Instability and Economic Security after the Great Recession, chapter 2, pages 28-52, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. T. Storme & J.R. Faulconbridge & J.V. Beaverstock & B. Derudder & F. Witlox, 2017. "Mobility and Professional Networks in Academia: An Exploration of the Obligations of Presence," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 405-424, May.
    12. M. Sarcinelli, 1996. "The Italian financial system in the mid-1990s: a difficult transition," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 49(196), pages 3-35.
    13. M. Sarcinelli, 1996. "The Italian financial system in the mid-1990s: a difficult transition," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 49(196), pages 3-35.
    14. J. Barkley Rosser, 2003. "A Nobel Prize for Asymmetric Information: The economic contributions of George Akerlof, Michael Spence and Joseph Stiglitz," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 3-21.
    15. Timothy P. Roth, 2014. "Economists and the State," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15078.
    16. Tomáš Otáhal, 2009. "Problém zastoupení v nové institucionální ekonomii [The Agency Problem in New Institutional Economics]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2009(5), pages 677-695.
    17. Bergner, Sören Martin & Bräutigam, Rainer & Evers, Maria Theresia & Spengel, Christoph, 2017. "The use of SME tax incentives in the European Union," ZEW Discussion Papers 17-006, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Maria Lissowska, 2010. "Polityka konsumencka – podstawy teoretyczne, cele i narzędzia," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 10, pages 57-77.
    19. Tamara TODOROVA, 2016. "Transaction Costs Market Failures and Economic Development," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 672-684.
    20. Liu, Ting & Quan, Lei & Gao, Xing, 2023. "Social dishonesty and corporate green innovation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 967-985.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    criticity; technology transfer; ONERA; SME; strategy © Réseau de Recherche sur l‟Innovation; 2010;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • F00 - International Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rii:rridoc:18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexandre UZUNIDIS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rilitfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.