IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/82990.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Axiomatizations of the proportional Shapley value

Author

Listed:
  • Besner, Manfred

Abstract

We provide new axiomatic characterizations of the proportional Shapley value, a weighted value with the worths of the singletons as weights. This value satisfies anonymity and therefore symmetry just as the Shapley value and has characterizations which are proportional counterparts to the famous characterizations of the Shapley value in Shapley (1953b), Myerson (1980) and Young (1985a). If the stand alone worths are plausible weights the proportional Shapley value is a convincing alternative to the Shapley value for example in cost allocation. We introduce two new axioms, called proportionality and player splitting respectively. Each of which gives a main difference between the proportional Shapley value and the Shapley value.

Suggested Citation

  • Besner, Manfred, 2017. "Axiomatizations of the proportional Shapley value," MPRA Paper 82990, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:82990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/82990/1/MPRA_paper_82990.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83048/1/MPRA_paper_82990.pdf
    File Function: revised version
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83103/1/MPRA_paper_83103.pdf
    File Function: revised version
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/89193/1/MPRA_paper_89193.pdf
    File Function: revised version
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93439/1/MPRA_paper_89193.pdf
    File Function: revised version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Radzik, Tadeusz, 2012. "A new look at the role of players’ weights in the weighted Shapley value," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 407-416.
    2. Nowak, A.S. & Radzik, T., 1995. "On axiomatizations of the weighted Shapley values," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 389-405.
    3. Martin Shubik, 1962. "Incentives, Decentralized Control, the Assignment of Joint Costs and Internal Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 325-343, April.
    4. Mingming Leng & Mahmut Parlar, 2009. "Allocation of Cost Savings in a Three-Level Supply Chain with Demand Information Sharing: A Cooperative-Game Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 200-213, February.
    5. K. Michael Ortmann, 2000. "The proportional value for positive cooperative games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 51(2), pages 235-248, April.
    6. Hart, Sergiu & Mas-Colell, Andreu, 1989. "Potential, Value, and Consistency," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 589-614, May.
    7. Roth, Ae & Verrecchia, Re, 1979. "Shapley Value As Applied To Cost Allocation - Reinterpretation," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 295-303.
    8. Gangolly, Js, 1981. "On Joint Cost Allocation - Independent Cost Proportional Scheme (Icps) And Its Properties," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 299-312.
    9. Chun, Youngsub, 1989. "A new axiomatization of the shapley value," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 119-130, June.
    10. Barry Feldman, 2000. "The Proportional Value of a Cooperative Game," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1140, Econometric Society.
    11. René Brink & René Levínský & Miroslav Zelený, 2015. "On proper Shapley values for monotone TU-games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(2), pages 449-471, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Besner, Manfred, 2018. "Proportional Shapley levels values," MPRA Paper 87120, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Besner, Manfred, 2018. "Player splitting, players merging, the Shapley set value and the Harsanyi set value," MPRA Paper 87125, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manfred Besner, 2019. "Axiomatizations of the proportional Shapley value," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 161-183, March.
    2. Manfred Besner, 2020. "Value dividends, the Harsanyi set and extensions, and the proportional Harsanyi solution," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 49(3), pages 851-873, September.
    3. Besner, Manfred, 2017. "Weighted Shapley levels values," MPRA Paper 82978, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Béal, Sylvain & Ferrières, Sylvain & Rémila, Eric & Solal, Philippe, 2018. "The proportional Shapley value and applications," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 93-112.
    5. Besner, Manfred, 2019. "Value dividends, the Harsanyi set and extensions, and the proportional Harsanyi payoff," MPRA Paper 92247, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Zhengxing Zou & René Brink & Youngsub Chun & Yukihiko Funaki, 2021. "Axiomatizations of the proportional division value," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(1), pages 35-62, July.
    7. Welter, Dominik & Napel, Stefan, 2016. "Responsibility-based allocation of cartel damages," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145886, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    8. Besner, Manfred, 2018. "Player splitting, players merging, the Shapley set value and the Harsanyi set value," MPRA Paper 87125, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Barry Feldman, 2002. "A Dual Model of Cooperative Value," Game Theory and Information 0207001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Li, Wenzhong & Xu, Genjiu & van den Brink, René, 2024. "Sign properties and axiomatizations of the weighted division values," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    11. Karpov, Alexander, 2014. "Equal weights coauthorship sharing and the Shapley value are equivalent," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 71-76.
    12. Besner, Manfred, 2021. "Disjointly productive players and the Shapley value," MPRA Paper 108241, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. René Brink & René Levínský & Miroslav Zelený, 2015. "On proper Shapley values for monotone TU-games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(2), pages 449-471, May.
    14. Besner, Manfred, 2021. "Disjointly and jointly productive players and the Shapley value," MPRA Paper 108511, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Zhengxing Zou & René Brink & Yukihiko Funaki, 2022. "Sharing the surplus and proportional values," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 185-217, July.
    16. Besner, Manfred, 2018. "Weighted Shapley hierarchy levels values," MPRA Paper 88160, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Calvo, Emilio & Gutiérrez-López, Esther, 2014. "Axiomatic characterizations of the weighted solidarity values," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 6-11.
    18. Conrado M. Manuel & Daniel Martín, 2020. "A Monotonic Weighted Shapley Value," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 627-654, August.
    19. Takaaki Abe & Satoshi Nakada, 2019. "The weighted-egalitarian Shapley values," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 52(2), pages 197-213, February.
    20. Karl Michael Ortmann, 2016. "Fair allocation of capital growth," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 181-196, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cost allocation; Dividends; Proportional Shapley value; (Weighted) Shapley value; Proportionality; Player splitting;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C7 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory
    • C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:82990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.