IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/74263.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Turnaround or Contract Merger: A conceptual model to protect sick and government companies

Author

Listed:
  • Reddy, Kotapati Srinivasa

Abstract

The prolific competition and unanticipated customer loyalty gave the ideological thought to craft combat strategies among firms, now it became a warriors’ battle. To achieve this, global firms are designing tactics to become a gladiator by choosing merger & acquisition as a synergistic choice. M&A is an opportunity for target firm shareholders in a high premium, on the other hand escalating monopoly by an acquirer in the respective market. These inorganic options will increase the capitalism in mixed economy countries that result in the loss of government control on public sector enterprises and sick industries. Availing this gap, the present conceptual study is aimed to introduce a new weapon for emerging market nations to protect state control and keep public belief. Exclusively, we try to accommodate and suggest a new financial arrangement or scheme against the existing model, i.e. Leveraged buyout (LBO). Finally, this array is supported by the Indian sick industries as case examples which were disappearing now. It also ensures that the economic sustainability and progress of nation would be achieved by the proposed ‘Contract Merger’ model.

Suggested Citation

  • Reddy, Kotapati Srinivasa, 2016. "Turnaround or Contract Merger: A conceptual model to protect sick and government companies," MPRA Paper 74263, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2016.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:74263
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/74263/1/MPRA_paper_74263.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Narendar Rao & K. Reddy, 2015. "The impact of the global financial crisis on cross-border mergers and acquisitions: a continental and industry analysis," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 5(2), pages 309-341, December.
    2. Levine, David P, 1980. "Aspects of the Classical Theory of Markets," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(34), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Robert E. Prasch, 1992. "Economics and Merger Mania: A Critique of Efficient Markets Theory," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 635-643, June.
    4. repec:bla:jfinan:v:44:y:1989:i:1:p:41-57 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Reddy, Kotapati Srinivasa & Nangia, Vinay Kumar & Agrawal, Rajat, 2013. "Indian economic-policy reforms, bank mergers, and lawful proposals: The ex-ante and ex-post ‘lookup’," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 601-622.
    6. Reddy, Kotapati Srinivasa, 2015. "The impact of the global financial crisis on border-crossing mergers and acquisitions: A continental/industry analysis," MPRA Paper 63563, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2015.
    7. K.S. Reddy & En Xie & Yuanyuan Huang, 2016. "Contractual buyout - a legitimate growth model in the enterprise development: foundations and implications," International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23.
    8. Schlingemann, Frederik P., 2004. "Financing decisions and bidder gains," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 683-701, November.
    9. David Felix, 1986. "Perspective," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 51-54, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reddy, Kotapati Srinivasa, 2015. "Market for Corporate Control and Contractual Buyout (CoBO): A New “Collective Ownership-and-Administrative” Strategy," MPRA Paper 63937, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2015.
    2. K.S. Reddy & En Xie & Yuanyuan Huang, 2016. "Contractual buyout - a legitimate growth model in the enterprise development: foundations and implications," International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23.
    3. Niti Bhasin & Amit Soni & Rabi Narayan Kar, 2021. "Do Institutional and Macroeconomic Factors Matter in IT companies M&As? Evidence from India," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 9(2), pages 286-305, May.
    4. Narendar V., Rao & K.S., Reddy, 2017. "Guest Editorial: Institutional role, the Market for corporate control and Firm performance," MPRA Paper 80235, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Vladimirov, Vladimir, 2015. "Financing bidders in takeover contests," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 534-557.
    6. Aybar, Bülent & Thanakijsombat, Thanarerk, 2015. "Financing decisions and gains from cross-border acquisitions by emerging-market acquirers," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 69-80.
    7. Utz Weitzel & Gerhard Kling, 2018. "Sold Below Value? Why Takeover Offers Can Have Negative Premiums," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 47(2), pages 421-450, June.
    8. Liang, Qing & Li, Zhaohua, 2022. "Debt enforcement and the cost of debt financing in M&As," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    9. Merkoulova, Yulia & Zivanovic, Branislav, 2022. "Financial constraints and financing sources in mergers and acquisitions," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    10. Ang, James S. & Ҫolak, Gӧnül & Zhang, Tai-Wei, 2014. "Decoupling by clienteles and by time in the financial markets: The case of two-stage stock-financed mergers," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 360-375.
    11. Weitzel, Utz & Kling, Gerhard, 2012. "Sold below value? Why some targets accept very low and even negative takeover premiums," MPRA Paper 42832, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Martynova, Marina & Renneboog, Luc, 2009. "What determines the financing decision in corporate takeovers: Cost of capital, agency problems, or the means of payment?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 290-315, June.
    13. Robert-Nicoud, Frédéric & Olarreaga, Marcelo & Carrère, Céline & Fugazza, Marco, 2016. "On the heterogeneous effect of trade on unemployment," CEPR Discussion Papers 11540, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Karampatsas, Nikolaos & Petmezas, Dimitris & Travlos, Nickolaos G., 2014. "Credit ratings and the choice of payment method in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 474-493.
    15. Magnanelli, Barbara Sveva & Nasta, Luigi & Ramazio, Emanuele, 2022. "Bid premiums and cumulative abnormal returns: An empirical investigation on the consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    16. Reddy, K. Srinivasa, 2011. "The aftermarket pricing performance of initial public offers: Insights from India," MPRA Paper 62885, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2013.
    17. Andrey Golubov & Dimitris Petmezas & Nickolaos G. Travlos, 2013. "Empirical mergers and acquisitions research: a review of methods, evidence and managerial implications," Chapters, in: Adrian R. Bell & Chris Brooks & Marcel Prokopczuk (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Finance, chapter 12, pages 287-313, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Mike Burkart & Samuel Lee, 2015. "Signalling to Dispersed Shareholders and Corporate Control," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 82(3), pages 922-962.
    19. Kinsey, Jean D., 1990. "U.S. Demographic Trends And Their Relationship To Food Markets," Staff Papers 13264, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    20. Jeffrey Harrison & Matthew Hart & Derek Oler, 2014. "Leverage and acquisition performance," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 571-603, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate restructuring; turnaround; merger; acquisition; LBO; disinvestment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:74263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.